Comparison of odor detection thresholds for n-butanol and benzaldehyde determined with a dynamic dilution olfactometer and in room air

Vanessa Thiele , Christian Monsé , Madlen David , Malgorzata Debiak , Marike Kolossa-Gehring , Thomas Brüning , Jürgen Bünger , Kirsten Sucker
{"title":"Comparison of odor detection thresholds for n-butanol and benzaldehyde determined with a dynamic dilution olfactometer and in room air","authors":"Vanessa Thiele ,&nbsp;Christian Monsé ,&nbsp;Madlen David ,&nbsp;Malgorzata Debiak ,&nbsp;Marike Kolossa-Gehring ,&nbsp;Thomas Brüning ,&nbsp;Jürgen Bünger ,&nbsp;Kirsten Sucker","doi":"10.1016/j.indenv.2024.100029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The German Committee on Indoor Air Guide Values (AIR) has developed a concept of odor guide values (OGV) based on odor detection thresholds (ODT) to assess the plausibility of complaints about odor annoyance. ODT were determined directly at the nose with a dynamic dilution olfactometer. However, OGV will be used when a person is exposed to the odor in a room. This study aimed to assess the comparability of ODT determined with a dynamic dilution olfactometer according to the European Standard for Olfactometry EN 13725:2022 with ODT determined in room air under standardized conditions as described in the International Standard ISO 16000–30. ODT for n-butanol and benzaldehyde were determined by each method in 20 healthy, non-smoking volunteers (10 women/10 men, 19–50 years). Participants were screened for normal olfactory function and selected and trained in odor assessment compliant with EN 13725:2022. Comparability of log-transformed ODT values was assessed using Bland-Altman plot analysis. ODT values determined in room air were lower than by dynamic olfactometry. The bias for n-butanol was – 0.48 lg(ppb) (limits of agreement (LoA): – 1.13, + 0.18) and for benzaldehyde – 0.25 lg(ppb) (LoA: – 0.76, + 0.26). Measured differences were considered practically negligible for benzaldehyde, but not for n-butanol. Surface adsorption effects in the dilution system of the olfactometer and differences in the test procedures are discussed as possible causes for this discrepancy. Concluding, ODT determined with an olfactometer directly at the nose are suitable for deriving OGV and can be applied when a person is exposed to odors in room air.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100665,"journal":{"name":"Indoor Environments","volume":"1 3","pages":"Article 100029"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950362024000262/pdfft?md5=0f9ee40ca58499513efab881e378251c&pid=1-s2.0-S2950362024000262-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indoor Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950362024000262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The German Committee on Indoor Air Guide Values (AIR) has developed a concept of odor guide values (OGV) based on odor detection thresholds (ODT) to assess the plausibility of complaints about odor annoyance. ODT were determined directly at the nose with a dynamic dilution olfactometer. However, OGV will be used when a person is exposed to the odor in a room. This study aimed to assess the comparability of ODT determined with a dynamic dilution olfactometer according to the European Standard for Olfactometry EN 13725:2022 with ODT determined in room air under standardized conditions as described in the International Standard ISO 16000–30. ODT for n-butanol and benzaldehyde were determined by each method in 20 healthy, non-smoking volunteers (10 women/10 men, 19–50 years). Participants were screened for normal olfactory function and selected and trained in odor assessment compliant with EN 13725:2022. Comparability of log-transformed ODT values was assessed using Bland-Altman plot analysis. ODT values determined in room air were lower than by dynamic olfactometry. The bias for n-butanol was – 0.48 lg(ppb) (limits of agreement (LoA): – 1.13, + 0.18) and for benzaldehyde – 0.25 lg(ppb) (LoA: – 0.76, + 0.26). Measured differences were considered practically negligible for benzaldehyde, but not for n-butanol. Surface adsorption effects in the dilution system of the olfactometer and differences in the test procedures are discussed as possible causes for this discrepancy. Concluding, ODT determined with an olfactometer directly at the nose are suitable for deriving OGV and can be applied when a person is exposed to odors in room air.

正丁醇和苯甲醛气味检测阈值的比较(用动态稀释嗅觉仪和室内空气测定
德国室内空气指导值委员会(AIR)根据气味检测阈值(ODT)提出了气味指导值(OGV)的概念,用于评估气味骚扰投诉的可信度。ODT 是用动态稀释嗅觉仪直接从鼻子测定的。然而,OGV 将用于人在房间内接触到气味时。本研究旨在评估根据欧洲嗅觉测量标准 EN 13725:2022 使用动态稀释嗅觉计测定的 ODT 与根据国际标准 ISO 16000-30 在标准化条件下在室内空气中测定的 ODT 的可比性。正丁醇和苯甲醛的 ODT 分别由 20 名健康、不吸烟的志愿者(10 名女性/10 名男性,19-50 岁)通过每种方法测定。参与者均经过筛查,嗅觉功能正常,并按照 EN 13725:2022 标准进行挑选和气味评估培训。对数转换后的 ODT 值的可比性采用 Bland-Altman 图分析法进行评估。在室内空气中测定的 ODT 值低于动态嗅觉测定法。正丁醇的偏差为 - 0.48 lg(ppb)(协议限值 (LoA): - 1.13, + 0.18),苯甲醛的偏差为 - 0.25 lg(ppb)(协议限值 (LoA): - 0.76, + 0.26)。苯甲醛的测量差异实际上可以忽略不计,但正丁醇的测量差异则不然。造成这种差异的可能原因是嗅觉仪稀释系统的表面吸附效应和测试程序的不同。总之,用嗅觉仪直接在鼻腔测定的 ODT 适合用于推导 OGV,并可在人暴露于室内空气中的气味时使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信