Tuberculosis screening for patients on biologic Medications: A Single-Center experience and Society guideline Review, Monroe County, New York, 2018–2021

IF 1.9 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Tetsuro Maeda , Margaret Connolly , Kelly Thevenet-Morrison , Paul Levy , Mark Utell , Sonal Munsiff , Daniel Croft
{"title":"Tuberculosis screening for patients on biologic Medications: A Single-Center experience and Society guideline Review, Monroe County, New York, 2018–2021","authors":"Tetsuro Maeda ,&nbsp;Margaret Connolly ,&nbsp;Kelly Thevenet-Morrison ,&nbsp;Paul Levy ,&nbsp;Mark Utell ,&nbsp;Sonal Munsiff ,&nbsp;Daniel Croft","doi":"10.1016/j.jctube.2024.100460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale</h3><p>Biologic medications for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases may increase the risk of tuberculosis (TB) reactivation, but data on screening for TB in low TB prevalence areas are limited.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the real-world practice patterns of TB screening among prescribers of biologic medications.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective observational study at a single, university-based healthcare facility in a low TB prevalence area. We enrolled adult patients prescribed a biologic medication between October 2018 and December 2021, and collected data on demographics, biologic medications and TB test results. For patients with positive TB tests, further data including prescriber specialty and response to positive tests were obtained. We reviewed pertinent major society guidelines/ consensus statements regarding TB screening among patients treated with biologic medications.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>4,085 patients were included. 3024 (74.0%) had at least one screening TB test and 42 were positive. Among patients treated with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) inhibitors, 1779 of 2129 patients (83.6%) underwent TB testing and 25 (1.4%) were positive. Most with positive TB test results were prescribed biologic medication by gastroenterology (11 patients, 26%), dermatology (12, 29%), or rheumatology (15, 36%) providers. 32 (76%) patients had imaging and roughly half were treated for latent TB infection. Biologic medications were temporarily held for 27 patients (67%). Nine out of 13 society guidelines recommend TB screening for TNFα inhibitors but have differing recommendations for other biologic medications.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Significant practice pattern differences in TB screening for patients receiving biologic medications exist. Multiple society guidelines continue to recommend TB screening even for drugs with no known increased risk of TB reactivation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405579424000470/pdfft?md5=aaa541c0d07cf00d1f7dc63ad5ee8082&pid=1-s2.0-S2405579424000470-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405579424000470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale

Biologic medications for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases may increase the risk of tuberculosis (TB) reactivation, but data on screening for TB in low TB prevalence areas are limited.

Objective

To assess the real-world practice patterns of TB screening among prescribers of biologic medications.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective observational study at a single, university-based healthcare facility in a low TB prevalence area. We enrolled adult patients prescribed a biologic medication between October 2018 and December 2021, and collected data on demographics, biologic medications and TB test results. For patients with positive TB tests, further data including prescriber specialty and response to positive tests were obtained. We reviewed pertinent major society guidelines/ consensus statements regarding TB screening among patients treated with biologic medications.

Results

4,085 patients were included. 3024 (74.0%) had at least one screening TB test and 42 were positive. Among patients treated with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) inhibitors, 1779 of 2129 patients (83.6%) underwent TB testing and 25 (1.4%) were positive. Most with positive TB test results were prescribed biologic medication by gastroenterology (11 patients, 26%), dermatology (12, 29%), or rheumatology (15, 36%) providers. 32 (76%) patients had imaging and roughly half were treated for latent TB infection. Biologic medications were temporarily held for 27 patients (67%). Nine out of 13 society guidelines recommend TB screening for TNFα inhibitors but have differing recommendations for other biologic medications.

Conclusions

Significant practice pattern differences in TB screening for patients receiving biologic medications exist. Multiple society guidelines continue to recommend TB screening even for drugs with no known increased risk of TB reactivation.

服用生物制剂药物患者的结核病筛查:2018-2021年纽约州门罗县的单中心经验和学会指南回顾
理由治疗免疫介导的炎症性疾病的生物制剂药物可能会增加结核病(TB)再活化的风险,但在结核病低流行地区进行结核病筛查的数据却很有限。方法我们在结核病低流行地区的一所大学医疗机构开展了一项回顾性观察研究。我们招募了 2018 年 10 月至 2021 年 12 月期间开具生物药处方的成年患者,并收集了有关人口统计学、生物药和结核病检测结果的数据。对于结核病检测呈阳性的患者,我们还进一步获得了包括处方者专业和对阳性检测的反应等数据。我们查阅了有关在接受生物药物治疗的患者中进行结核病筛查的主要学会指南/共识声明。3024人(74.0%)至少进行了一次结核病筛查,其中42人呈阳性。在接受肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNFα)抑制剂治疗的患者中,2129 名患者中有 1779 名(83.6%)接受了结核病检测,25 名(1.4%)呈阳性。大多数结核病检测结果呈阳性的患者都接受了消化科(11 人,26%)、皮肤科(12 人,29%)或风湿免疫科(15 人,36%)医生开具的生物制剂药物治疗。32(76%)名患者接受了影像学检查,约半数接受了潜伏肺结核感染治疗。有 27 名患者(67%)暂时停用了生物制剂药物。在 13 份学会指南中,有 9 份建议对 TNFα 抑制剂进行结核病筛查,但对其他生物制剂药物的建议有所不同。多个学会的指南继续建议对结核病进行筛查,即使是已知结核病再激活风险不会增加的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases
Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Mycobacterial Diseases aims to provide a forum for clinically relevant articles on all aspects of tuberculosis and other mycobacterial infections, including (but not limited to) epidemiology, clinical investigation, transmission, diagnosis, treatment, drug-resistance and public policy, and encourages the submission of clinical studies, thematic reviews and case reports. Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Mycobacterial Diseases is an Open Access publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信