Intensive blood pressure control in isolated systolic hypertension: a post hoc analysis of a cluster randomized trial

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Chang Wang , Songyue Liu , Wei Miao , Ning Ye , Ziyi Xie , Lixia Qiao , Nanxiang Ouyang , Yangzhi Yin , Yingxian Sun , Guozhe Sun
{"title":"Intensive blood pressure control in isolated systolic hypertension: a post hoc analysis of a cluster randomized trial","authors":"Chang Wang ,&nbsp;Songyue Liu ,&nbsp;Wei Miao ,&nbsp;Ning Ye ,&nbsp;Ziyi Xie ,&nbsp;Lixia Qiao ,&nbsp;Nanxiang Ouyang ,&nbsp;Yangzhi Yin ,&nbsp;Yingxian Sun ,&nbsp;Guozhe Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) is of high prevalence, with a relatively poor prognosis. However, there is still no direct evidence to demonstrate the benefits of intensive blood pressure (BP) control among these patients. We aimed to evaluate intensive BP control with the target of &lt;130/80 mmHg in ISH.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a post hoc analysis of patients with ISH in the China Rural Hypertension Control Project (CRHCP), defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) &lt; 90 mmHg. The primary outcome was cardiovascular disease (CVD) including stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and CVD death. Mixed-effect Cox proportional regression and generalized estimating equation models were used for analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>In total, 7981 patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 8005 to the usual care group between May 8 and November 27, 2018. The median follow-up was 3.02 years (25–75%: 2.98–3.06). Mean systolic/diastolic BP at the end of 36 months follow-up was 126.5/71.2 mmHg in the intensive BP control group and 148.1/78.6 mmHg in the usual care group. The intervention group presented a substantially lower rate of composite CVD compared with the usual care group (1.52% versus 2.30%/year; multiple-adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57–0.72; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), especially for stroke (multiple-adjusted HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.53–0.70; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), HF (multiple-adjusted HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.36–0.91; <em>P</em> = 0.017) and CVD death (multiple-adjusted HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.50–0.83; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The primary composite outcome was substantially reduced by 36% in the intervention group compared with the usual care group. The further interaction analysis revealed that the reduction of primary outcome by intervention was consistent across subgroups of sex, age, education level, history of CVD, use of antihypertensive medication and baseline DBP (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05 for all interaction test). The incidences of symptomatic hypotension, syncope injurious falls and renal outcomes did not differ between the two groups, even though hypotension was increased in intervention group (RR:1.71; 95% CI: 1.28–2.28; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Intensive BP control (&lt;130/80 mmHg) was effective and safe in patients with ISH for the prevention of CVD events.</p></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><p>The <span>Ministry of Science and Technology (China) of China</span> and the <span>Science and Technology Program of Liaoning Province</span>, China.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22792,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666606524001214/pdfft?md5=d082d25c14c642b5b2533628cd569a17&pid=1-s2.0-S2666606524001214-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666606524001214","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) is of high prevalence, with a relatively poor prognosis. However, there is still no direct evidence to demonstrate the benefits of intensive blood pressure (BP) control among these patients. We aimed to evaluate intensive BP control with the target of <130/80 mmHg in ISH.

Methods

This was a post hoc analysis of patients with ISH in the China Rural Hypertension Control Project (CRHCP), defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 90 mmHg. The primary outcome was cardiovascular disease (CVD) including stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and CVD death. Mixed-effect Cox proportional regression and generalized estimating equation models were used for analysis.

Findings

In total, 7981 patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 8005 to the usual care group between May 8 and November 27, 2018. The median follow-up was 3.02 years (25–75%: 2.98–3.06). Mean systolic/diastolic BP at the end of 36 months follow-up was 126.5/71.2 mmHg in the intensive BP control group and 148.1/78.6 mmHg in the usual care group. The intervention group presented a substantially lower rate of composite CVD compared with the usual care group (1.52% versus 2.30%/year; multiple-adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57–0.72; P < 0.001), especially for stroke (multiple-adjusted HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.53–0.70; P < 0.001), HF (multiple-adjusted HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.36–0.91; P = 0.017) and CVD death (multiple-adjusted HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.50–0.83; P < 0.001). The primary composite outcome was substantially reduced by 36% in the intervention group compared with the usual care group. The further interaction analysis revealed that the reduction of primary outcome by intervention was consistent across subgroups of sex, age, education level, history of CVD, use of antihypertensive medication and baseline DBP (P > 0.05 for all interaction test). The incidences of symptomatic hypotension, syncope injurious falls and renal outcomes did not differ between the two groups, even though hypotension was increased in intervention group (RR:1.71; 95% CI: 1.28–2.28; P < 0.001).

Interpretation

Intensive BP control (<130/80 mmHg) was effective and safe in patients with ISH for the prevention of CVD events.

Funding

The Ministry of Science and Technology (China) of China and the Science and Technology Program of Liaoning Province, China.

孤立性收缩期高血压的强化血压控制:分组随机试验的事后分析
背景孤立性收缩期高血压(ISH)发病率高,预后相对较差。然而,目前仍没有直接证据表明强化血压控制对这些患者有好处。方法这是对中国农村高血压控制项目(CRHCP)中的 ISH 患者进行的一项事后分析,ISH 的定义是收缩压(SBP)≥ 140 mmHg 和舒张压(DBP)≥ 90 mmHg。主要结果是心血管疾病(CVD),包括中风、心肌梗死、心力衰竭和心血管疾病死亡。采用混合效应 Cox 比例回归和广义估计方程模型进行分析。研究结果在 2018 年 5 月 8 日至 11 月 27 日期间,共有 7981 名患者被随机分配到干预组,8005 名患者被随机分配到常规护理组。中位随访时间为 3.02 年(25%-75%:2.98-3.06 年)。随访36个月结束时,强化血压控制组的平均收缩压/舒张压分别为126.5/71.2 mmHg,常规护理组的平均收缩压/舒张压分别为148.1/78.6 mmHg。与常规护理组相比,干预组的复合心血管疾病发生率大大降低(1.52% 对 2.30%/年;多重调整危险比(HR):0.64;95% 置信区间(CI):0.57-0.72;P < 0.001),尤其是中风(多重调整HR:0.61;95% CI:0.53-0.70;P <;0.001)、HF(多重调整HR:0.57;95% CI:0.36-0.91;P = 0.017)和心血管疾病死亡(多重调整HR:0.64;95% CI:0.50-0.83;P <;0.001)。与常规护理组相比,干预组的主要综合结果大幅降低了 36%。进一步的交互分析表明,在不同性别、年龄、教育水平、心血管疾病史、使用降压药和基线 DBP 的亚组中,干预对主要结果的降低是一致的(所有交互检验的 P > 0.05)。尽管干预组低血压发生率增加,但两组间症状性低血压、晕厥损伤性跌倒和肾脏疾病的发生率并无差异(RR:1.71;95% CI:1.28-2.28;P< 0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific
The Lancet Regional Health: Western Pacific Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
305
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, a gold open access journal, is an integral part of The Lancet's global initiative advocating for healthcare quality and access worldwide. It aims to advance clinical practice and health policy in the Western Pacific region, contributing to enhanced health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research shedding light on clinical practice and health policy in the region. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces covering diverse regional health topics, such as infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, child and adolescent health, maternal and reproductive health, aging health, mental health, the health workforce and systems, and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信