A Field in Transition: A Scoping Review and Thematic Network Map of Qualitative Health Research in Liver Transplantation

Selena Zhang , Chloe Wong-Mersereau , Ani Orchanian-Cheff , Maryam Makki , Shikha Gandhi , Kelly Fritsch , Mamatha Bhat , Suze Berkhout
{"title":"A Field in Transition: A Scoping Review and Thematic Network Map of Qualitative Health Research in Liver Transplantation","authors":"Selena Zhang ,&nbsp;Chloe Wong-Mersereau ,&nbsp;Ani Orchanian-Cheff ,&nbsp;Maryam Makki ,&nbsp;Shikha Gandhi ,&nbsp;Kelly Fritsch ,&nbsp;Mamatha Bhat ,&nbsp;Suze Berkhout","doi":"10.1016/j.liver.2024.100233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND</h3><p>In liver transplantation, qualitative methodologies can offer important insights from a range of perspectives into the meaning and impact of health experiences. This review aims to characterize the existing qualitative research in liver transplantation to understand how this work has evolved over time, its contribution to understanding clinical issues, and to conceptualize under-developed areas for future research.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Studies from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to January 2024. All English language studies focused on a liver transplant population with qualitative methodological components were included. Using VOSviewer network mapping software we constructed a visualization of the thematic networks within included studies.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>Our initial search yielded 9092 studies from which 229 were included in the final review. Data extraction revealed significant increases in the publication of qualitative studies since 2015, predominantly utilizing interviews and focus groups. The thematic network map we constructed placed “social support” as a dominant and central concept across many different studies, with related themes tending to cluster within four domains of research: <em>Care of the Organ &amp; Patienthood; Identity, Embodiment, Adjustment; Relational &amp; Ethical Issues; Existential Themes</em>. Medicalized subject such as “self-management” were less well-networked with identity-related, ethical, and existential topics.</p></div><div><h3>DISCUSSION</h3><p>There is a growing body of rich qualitative research in liver transplantation. Future research would benefit from more longitudinal approaches as well as increased attention to the interrelation between “clinical” issues (adherence, quality of life) and ethical, relational, and existential ones.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Liver Transplantation","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666967624000345/pdfft?md5=90219842834346a9477c0d9c9686c126&pid=1-s2.0-S2666967624000345-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Liver Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666967624000345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In liver transplantation, qualitative methodologies can offer important insights from a range of perspectives into the meaning and impact of health experiences. This review aims to characterize the existing qualitative research in liver transplantation to understand how this work has evolved over time, its contribution to understanding clinical issues, and to conceptualize under-developed areas for future research.

METHODS

Studies from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched from database inception to January 2024. All English language studies focused on a liver transplant population with qualitative methodological components were included. Using VOSviewer network mapping software we constructed a visualization of the thematic networks within included studies.

RESULTS

Our initial search yielded 9092 studies from which 229 were included in the final review. Data extraction revealed significant increases in the publication of qualitative studies since 2015, predominantly utilizing interviews and focus groups. The thematic network map we constructed placed “social support” as a dominant and central concept across many different studies, with related themes tending to cluster within four domains of research: Care of the Organ & Patienthood; Identity, Embodiment, Adjustment; Relational & Ethical Issues; Existential Themes. Medicalized subject such as “self-management” were less well-networked with identity-related, ethical, and existential topics.

DISCUSSION

There is a growing body of rich qualitative research in liver transplantation. Future research would benefit from more longitudinal approaches as well as increased attention to the interrelation between “clinical” issues (adherence, quality of life) and ethical, relational, and existential ones.

转型中的领域:肝移植定性健康研究的范围审查和主题网络图
背景在肝脏移植中,定性方法可以从不同的角度对健康体验的意义和影响提供重要的见解。本综述旨在描述肝移植领域现有定性研究的特点,以了解这项工作随着时间的推移是如何发展的、它对理解临床问题的贡献,以及对未来研究中尚未充分开发的领域进行构思。方法检索了从数据库开始到 2024 年 1 月的 MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane 系统性综述数据库、CENTRAL、CINAHL 和 Web of Science 中的研究。所有以肝移植人群为研究对象、采用定性方法的英文研究均被纳入其中。我们使用 VOSviewer 网络映射软件构建了所纳入研究的可视化主题网络。数据提取结果表明,自 2015 年以来,主要利用访谈和焦点小组发表的定性研究成果大幅增加。在我们构建的主题网络图中,"社会支持 "是许多不同研究的主导和核心概念,相关主题往往集中在四个研究领域:器官护理与患者身份;身份、体现、适应;关系与伦理问题;存在主义主题。医疗化主题,如 "自我管理",与身份相关、伦理和存在性主题之间的联系较少。未来的研究将受益于更多的纵向研究方法,以及对 "临床 "问题(依从性、生活质量)与伦理、关系和生存问题之间相互关系的更多关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信