Evaluating a medication history-taking entrustable professional activity and its assessment tool – Survey of a statewide public hospital pharmacy service

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Huri Balikubiri , Lauren Corré , Jacinta L. Johnson , Sally Marotti
{"title":"Evaluating a medication history-taking entrustable professional activity and its assessment tool – Survey of a statewide public hospital pharmacy service","authors":"Huri Balikubiri ,&nbsp;Lauren Corré ,&nbsp;Jacinta L. Johnson ,&nbsp;Sally Marotti","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) are tasks that professionals within a field perform autonomously. EPAs are incorporated in workplace-based assessment tools to assist training and professional development. Few studies have evaluated medication history-taking EPAs use in pharmacy practice and none have sought stakeholder feedback on their use. This study evaluates the quality of the medication history-taking EPA utilized in South Australian public hospitals and the usability of its assessment tool.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A voluntary online questionnaire was conducted from July 15th to September 2nd 2021 to gather the opinions of stakeholders on the use of the medication history-taking EPA. The questionnaire was developed based on tools identified in the literature and utilized 14 open-text and five-point Likert scale questions. The questionnaire was distributed using Survey Monkey® to a purposive sample of staff and students.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>82 responses were received from 218 surveys distributed, yielding a response rate of 38%. Respondents believed the EPA promotes learner development (90.6%) and the provision of useful feedback (83%). 94.3% considered the EPA to be easy to use but only 56.6% indicated that using it fits easily within their workday. Time constraints and the presence of context-specific descriptors were commonly perceived as limitations. Some stakeholders indicated a lack of understanding of entrustment decisions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The EPA and its assessment tool were perceived to have good quality and usability. Reducing the length of the tool, broadening its applicability across contexts, and improving user understanding of entrustment decision-making may support better use of the tool.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"16 10","pages":"Article 102134"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129724001667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) are tasks that professionals within a field perform autonomously. EPAs are incorporated in workplace-based assessment tools to assist training and professional development. Few studies have evaluated medication history-taking EPAs use in pharmacy practice and none have sought stakeholder feedback on their use. This study evaluates the quality of the medication history-taking EPA utilized in South Australian public hospitals and the usability of its assessment tool.

Methods

A voluntary online questionnaire was conducted from July 15th to September 2nd 2021 to gather the opinions of stakeholders on the use of the medication history-taking EPA. The questionnaire was developed based on tools identified in the literature and utilized 14 open-text and five-point Likert scale questions. The questionnaire was distributed using Survey Monkey® to a purposive sample of staff and students.

Results

82 responses were received from 218 surveys distributed, yielding a response rate of 38%. Respondents believed the EPA promotes learner development (90.6%) and the provision of useful feedback (83%). 94.3% considered the EPA to be easy to use but only 56.6% indicated that using it fits easily within their workday. Time constraints and the presence of context-specific descriptors were commonly perceived as limitations. Some stakeholders indicated a lack of understanding of entrustment decisions.

Conclusion

The EPA and its assessment tool were perceived to have good quality and usability. Reducing the length of the tool, broadening its applicability across contexts, and improving user understanding of entrustment decision-making may support better use of the tool.

评估药历采集委托专业活动及其评估工具--全州公立医院药学服务调查
导言可委托专业活动(EPA)是专业人员在某一领域内自主完成的任务。EPAs 被纳入基于工作场所的评估工具,以帮助培训和专业发展。很少有研究对药学实践中的用药史采集 EPA 进行评估,也没有研究就 EPA 的使用征求利益相关者的反馈意见。本研究对南澳大利亚州公立医院使用的用药史 EPA 的质量及其评估工具的可用性进行了评估。方法于 2021 年 7 月 15 日至 9 月 2 日进行了自愿在线问卷调查,以收集利益相关者对用药史 EPA 使用情况的意见。调查问卷是根据文献中确定的工具开发的,使用了 14 个开放文本和五点李克特量表问题。调查问卷使用 Survey Monkey® 对教职员工和学生进行了有目的的抽样调查。结果从发放的 218 份调查问卷中收到了 82 份回复,回复率为 38%。受访者认为 EPA 促进了学习者的发展(90.6%),并提供了有用的反馈(83%)。94.3%的受访者认为 EPA 易于使用,但只有 56.6%的受访者表示使用 EPA 在他们的日常工作中很方便。时间限制和特定背景描述符的存在被普遍认为是限制因素。一些利益相关者表示对委托决策缺乏了解。缩短工具的长度、扩大其在不同情况下的适用性以及提高用户对委托决策的理解可能有助于更好地使用该工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
192
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信