Unplanned emergency department visits within 90 days of hip hemiarthroplasty for osteoporotic femoral neck fractures: Reasons, risks, and mortalities

IF 2.5 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Yang-Yi Wang , Yi-Chuan Chou , Yuan-Hsin Tsai , Chih-Wei Chang , Yi-Chen Chen , Ta-Wei Tai
{"title":"Unplanned emergency department visits within 90 days of hip hemiarthroplasty for osteoporotic femoral neck fractures: Reasons, risks, and mortalities","authors":"Yang-Yi Wang ,&nbsp;Yi-Chuan Chou ,&nbsp;Yuan-Hsin Tsai ,&nbsp;Chih-Wei Chang ,&nbsp;Yi-Chen Chen ,&nbsp;Ta-Wei Tai","doi":"10.1016/j.afos.2024.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Bipolar hemiarthroplasty is commonly performed to treat displaced femoral neck fractures in osteoporotic patients. This study aimed to assess the occurrence and outcomes of unplanned return visits to the emergency department (ED) within 90 days following bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The clinical data of 1322 consecutive patients who underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasty for osteoporotic femoral neck fractures at a tertiary medical center were analyzed. Data from the patients’ electronic medical records, including demographic information, comorbidities, and operative details, were collected. The risk factors and mortality rates were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Within 90 days after surgery, 19.9% of patients returned to the ED. Surgery-related reasons accounted for 20.2% of the patient's returns. Older age, a high Charlson comorbidity index score, chronic kidney disease, and a history of cancer were identified as significant risk factors for unplanned ED visits. Patients with uncemented implants had a significantly greater risk of returning to the ED due to periprosthetic fractures than did those with cemented implants (P = 0.04). Patients who returned to the ED within 90 days had an almost fivefold greater 1-year mortality rate (15.2% vs 3.1%, P &lt; 0.001) and a greater overall mortality rate (26.2% vs 10.5%, P &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study highlights the importance of identifying risk factors for unplanned ED visits after bipolar hemiarthroplasty, which may contribute to a better prognosis. Consideration should be given to the use of cemented implants for hemiarthroplasty, as uncemented implants are associated with a greater risk of periprosthetic fractures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19701,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405525524000670/pdfft?md5=2711884ce15727a5efbf84469f2e9918&pid=1-s2.0-S2405525524000670-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405525524000670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Bipolar hemiarthroplasty is commonly performed to treat displaced femoral neck fractures in osteoporotic patients. This study aimed to assess the occurrence and outcomes of unplanned return visits to the emergency department (ED) within 90 days following bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures.

Methods

The clinical data of 1322 consecutive patients who underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasty for osteoporotic femoral neck fractures at a tertiary medical center were analyzed. Data from the patients’ electronic medical records, including demographic information, comorbidities, and operative details, were collected. The risk factors and mortality rates were analyzed.

Results

Within 90 days after surgery, 19.9% of patients returned to the ED. Surgery-related reasons accounted for 20.2% of the patient's returns. Older age, a high Charlson comorbidity index score, chronic kidney disease, and a history of cancer were identified as significant risk factors for unplanned ED visits. Patients with uncemented implants had a significantly greater risk of returning to the ED due to periprosthetic fractures than did those with cemented implants (P = 0.04). Patients who returned to the ED within 90 days had an almost fivefold greater 1-year mortality rate (15.2% vs 3.1%, P < 0.001) and a greater overall mortality rate (26.2% vs 10.5%, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

This study highlights the importance of identifying risk factors for unplanned ED visits after bipolar hemiarthroplasty, which may contribute to a better prognosis. Consideration should be given to the use of cemented implants for hemiarthroplasty, as uncemented implants are associated with a greater risk of periprosthetic fractures.

髋关节半关节置换术治疗骨质疏松性股骨颈骨折 90 天内的计划外急诊就诊:原因、风险和死亡率
目的双极半关节置换术通常用于治疗骨质疏松患者的股骨颈移位性骨折。本研究旨在评估双极半关节置换术治疗股骨颈移位性骨折后 90 天内急诊科(ED)意外复诊的发生率和结果。研究人员收集了患者的电子病历数据,包括人口统计学信息、合并症和手术细节。结果术后90天内,19.9%的患者返回急诊室。20.2%的患者返回急诊室的原因与手术有关。年龄较大、夏尔森综合症指数得分较高、慢性肾病和癌症病史被认为是非计划性急诊就诊的重要风险因素。植入非骨水泥假体的患者因假体周围骨折返回急诊室的风险明显高于植入骨水泥假体的患者(P = 0.04)。90天内重返急诊室的患者1年死亡率(15.2% vs 3.1%,P < 0.001)和总死亡率(26.2% vs 10.5%,P < 0.001)几乎高出5倍。应考虑在半关节成形术中使用骨水泥植入物,因为非骨水泥植入物与更高的假体周围骨折风险相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology
自引率
5.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信