Adherence to treatment in patients with animal bites in a hospital of Colombia

IF 2.3 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Daniela Paola Escobar Domingo , Erika Marcela Méndez Ordóñez , Manuel Andrés Ferro Morales , Leonardo Rueda Medina , Mauricio Rodríguez Urrea , Francisco Zambrano García
{"title":"Adherence to treatment in patients with animal bites in a hospital of Colombia","authors":"Daniela Paola Escobar Domingo ,&nbsp;Erika Marcela Méndez Ordóñez ,&nbsp;Manuel Andrés Ferro Morales ,&nbsp;Leonardo Rueda Medina ,&nbsp;Mauricio Rodríguez Urrea ,&nbsp;Francisco Zambrano García","doi":"10.1016/j.cegh.2024.101694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The treatment of animal bite wounds includes both local management and prophylactic use of oral antibiotics. However, the effectiveness of the latter in our population is inconclusive. This research aims to identify the relationship between adherence to antibiotic treatment and the infection rate after an animal bite.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in Colombia. All patients who had suffered animal bites were included in this study. T-tests and chi-square tests were used to evaluate the results. Subgroup analysis was performed, and the risk ratio was calculated with a 95 % confidence interval.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 227 patients were included, of whom 56.4 % were male, with an average age of 22 years, and 43.6 % were female. Canine bites accounted for 90.3 % of the cases, with the hand being the most frequently affected anatomical area. Beta-lactam antibiotics with beta-lactamase inhibitors were the most commonly used (53 %). Adherence to antibiotic treatment was observed in 63 % of the patients. Signs and symptoms of infection occurred in 44 % of cases, while suture dehiscence occurred in only 3 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>While adherence to treatment is acceptable, infection occurs at a high percentage. The adherence rate to antibiotic treatment in dog bites is high; however, the use of antibiotics remains controversial, as healthcare professionals do not adequately adhere to national guidelines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398424001908/pdfft?md5=e2cf74ad4504e3f502a059d58af5babc&pid=1-s2.0-S2213398424001908-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398424001908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The treatment of animal bite wounds includes both local management and prophylactic use of oral antibiotics. However, the effectiveness of the latter in our population is inconclusive. This research aims to identify the relationship between adherence to antibiotic treatment and the infection rate after an animal bite.

Methods

A prospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in Colombia. All patients who had suffered animal bites were included in this study. T-tests and chi-square tests were used to evaluate the results. Subgroup analysis was performed, and the risk ratio was calculated with a 95 % confidence interval.

Results

A total of 227 patients were included, of whom 56.4 % were male, with an average age of 22 years, and 43.6 % were female. Canine bites accounted for 90.3 % of the cases, with the hand being the most frequently affected anatomical area. Beta-lactam antibiotics with beta-lactamase inhibitors were the most commonly used (53 %). Adherence to antibiotic treatment was observed in 63 % of the patients. Signs and symptoms of infection occurred in 44 % of cases, while suture dehiscence occurred in only 3 %.

Conclusions

While adherence to treatment is acceptable, infection occurs at a high percentage. The adherence rate to antibiotic treatment in dog bites is high; however, the use of antibiotics remains controversial, as healthcare professionals do not adequately adhere to national guidelines.

哥伦比亚一家医院的动物咬伤患者坚持治疗的情况
背景动物咬伤的治疗包括局部处理和预防性口服抗生素。然而,后者在我国人群中的有效性尚无定论。本研究旨在确定坚持抗生素治疗与动物咬伤后感染率之间的关系。研究对象包括所有被动物咬伤的患者。研究采用T检验和卡方检验对结果进行评估。共纳入 227 名患者,其中男性占 56.4%,平均年龄为 22 岁,女性占 43.6%。被犬咬伤的病例占 90.3%,手部是最常受影响的解剖部位。最常用的抗生素是β-内酰胺类抗生素和β-内酰胺酶抑制剂(53%)。63%的患者坚持接受抗生素治疗。44%的病例出现感染症状和体征,只有3%的病例出现缝合开裂。狗咬伤患者坚持使用抗生素治疗的比例很高;但是,由于医护人员没有充分遵守国家指导方针,抗生素的使用仍然存在争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
218
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health (CEGH) is a multidisciplinary journal and it is published four times (March, June, September, December) a year. The mandate of CEGH is to promote articles on clinical epidemiology with focus on developing countries in the context of global health. We also accept articles from other countries. It publishes original research work across all disciplines of medicine and allied sciences, related to clinical epidemiology and global health. The journal publishes Original articles, Review articles, Evidence Summaries, Letters to the Editor. All articles published in CEGH are peer-reviewed and published online for immediate access and citation.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信