Deep learning analysis for differential diagnosis and risk classification of gastrointestinal tumors.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Tomohisa Iwai, Mitsuhiro Kida, Kosuke Okuwaki, Masafumi Watanabe, Kai Adachi, Junro Ishizaki, Taro Hanaoka, Akihiro Tamaki, Masayoshi Tadehara, Hiroshi Imaizumi, Chika Kusano
{"title":"Deep learning analysis for differential diagnosis and risk classification of gastrointestinal tumors.","authors":"Tomohisa Iwai, Mitsuhiro Kida, Kosuke Okuwaki, Masafumi Watanabe, Kai Adachi, Junro Ishizaki, Taro Hanaoka, Akihiro Tamaki, Masayoshi Tadehara, Hiroshi Imaizumi, Chika Kusano","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2024.2368241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) has been applied to clinical diagnosis. Although AI has already been developed for gastrointestinal (GI) tract endoscopy, few studies have applied AI to endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) images. In this study, we used a computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) system with deep learning analysis of EUS images (EUS-CAD) and assessed its ability to differentiate GI stromal tumors (GISTs) from other mesenchymal tumors and their risk classification performance.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 101 pathologically confirmed cases of subepithelial lesions (SELs) arising from the muscularis propria layer, including 69 GISTs, 17 leiomyomas and 15 schwannomas, were examined. A total of 3283 EUS images were used for training and five-fold-cross-validation, and 827 images were independently tested for diagnosing GISTs. For the risk classification of 69 GISTs, including very-low-, low-, intermediate- and high-risk GISTs, 2,784 EUS images were used for training and three-fold-cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the differential diagnostic performance of GIST among all SELs, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were 80.4%, 82.9%, 75.3% and 0.865, respectively, whereas those for intermediate- and high-risk GISTs were 71.8%, 70.2%, 72.0% and 0.771, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EUS-CAD system showed a good diagnostic yield in differentiating GISTs from other mesenchymal tumors and successfully demonstrated the GIST risk classification feasibility. This system can determine whether treatment is necessary based on EUS imaging alone without the need for additional invasive examinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"925-932"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2024.2368241","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) has been applied to clinical diagnosis. Although AI has already been developed for gastrointestinal (GI) tract endoscopy, few studies have applied AI to endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) images. In this study, we used a computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) system with deep learning analysis of EUS images (EUS-CAD) and assessed its ability to differentiate GI stromal tumors (GISTs) from other mesenchymal tumors and their risk classification performance.

Materials and methods: A total of 101 pathologically confirmed cases of subepithelial lesions (SELs) arising from the muscularis propria layer, including 69 GISTs, 17 leiomyomas and 15 schwannomas, were examined. A total of 3283 EUS images were used for training and five-fold-cross-validation, and 827 images were independently tested for diagnosing GISTs. For the risk classification of 69 GISTs, including very-low-, low-, intermediate- and high-risk GISTs, 2,784 EUS images were used for training and three-fold-cross-validation.

Results: For the differential diagnostic performance of GIST among all SELs, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were 80.4%, 82.9%, 75.3% and 0.865, respectively, whereas those for intermediate- and high-risk GISTs were 71.8%, 70.2%, 72.0% and 0.771, respectively.

Conclusions: The EUS-CAD system showed a good diagnostic yield in differentiating GISTs from other mesenchymal tumors and successfully demonstrated the GIST risk classification feasibility. This system can determine whether treatment is necessary based on EUS imaging alone without the need for additional invasive examinations.

用于胃肠道肿瘤鉴别诊断和风险分类的深度学习分析。
目的:最近,人工智能(AI)被应用于临床诊断。虽然人工智能已被开发用于胃肠道(GI)内窥镜检查,但很少有研究将人工智能应用于内窥镜超声(EUS)图像。在这项研究中,我们使用了一种对 EUS 图像进行深度学习分析的计算机辅助诊断(CAD)系统(EUS-CAD),并评估了该系统区分消化道间质瘤(GIST)与其他间叶肿瘤的能力及其风险分类性能:共研究了101例经病理证实的来自固有肌层的上皮下病变(SELs),其中包括69例GISTs、17例利肌瘤和15例分裂瘤。共使用了 3283 张 EUS 图像进行训练和五倍交叉验证,并对 827 张图像进行了独立测试,以诊断 GIST。在对 69 例 GIST(包括极低、低、中和高风险 GIST)进行风险分类时,共使用了 2,784 张 EUS 图像进行训练和三次交叉验证:对于所有SEL中GIST的鉴别诊断性能,其准确性、灵敏度、特异性和接收器操作特征曲线下面积(ROC)分别为80.4%、82.9%、75.3%和0.865,而对于中危和高危GIST的准确性、灵敏度、特异性和接收器操作特征曲线下面积分别为71.8%、70.2%、72.0%和0.771:EUS-CAD系统在区分GIST和其他间质肿瘤方面显示出良好的诊断率,并成功证明了GIST风险分类的可行性。该系统可仅根据 EUS 成像确定是否有必要进行治疗,而无需进行其他侵入性检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信