Olfactory dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Rhinology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.4193/Rhin23.451
A Cardella, A Ferrulli, S Vujosevic, A Preti, F Ambrogi, I Terruzzi, A Cecamore, A Yakirevitch, A Schindler, L Luzi, F Mozzanica
{"title":"Olfactory dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.","authors":"A Cardella, A Ferrulli, S Vujosevic, A Preti, F Ambrogi, I Terruzzi, A Cecamore, A Yakirevitch, A Schindler, L Luzi, F Mozzanica","doi":"10.4193/Rhin23.451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>diabetic complications and olfactory dysfunction (OD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) seem related. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of OD in T2DM patients and to analyze its relationship with diabetic complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>130 T2DM patients and 100 comparable controls were enrolled. Olfaction was evaluated using the Extended Smell Test (TDI) and the Italian brief Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders â€\" Brief-IT-QOD. T2DM patients were divided into: \"Group 1\" patients with no complications, and \"Group 2\" patients with at least one diabetic complication. Non-parametric tests were used. Machine learning algorithms were applied to explore which variables were most important in predicting the presence of OD in T2DM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of OD was significantly higher in Group 2 than in controls (71.4% vs 30%) and in Group 1 (71.4% vs 43.3%). However, when comparing the TDI scores between Group 1 and 2 the only significant difference was found for the discrimination scale and not for the identification and threshold scales. Brief-IT-QOD scores were significantly higher in Group 2 than in controls. The Random Forest and variable importance algorithms highlighted the relevance of LDL, glycated hemoglobin, type of complication (macrovascular) and age in determining OD in T2DM. The last three variables were included in a nomogram for the prediction of OD risk in T2DM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>T2DM patients with diabetic complications are more frequently affected by OD. Poor glycemic control, LDL values, age and presence of macrovascular complications are the more important factors in determining OD in T2DM patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":21361,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":"537-547"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin23.451","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: diabetic complications and olfactory dysfunction (OD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) seem related. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of OD in T2DM patients and to analyze its relationship with diabetic complications.

Methods: 130 T2DM patients and 100 comparable controls were enrolled. Olfaction was evaluated using the Extended Smell Test (TDI) and the Italian brief Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders â€" Brief-IT-QOD. T2DM patients were divided into: "Group 1" patients with no complications, and "Group 2" patients with at least one diabetic complication. Non-parametric tests were used. Machine learning algorithms were applied to explore which variables were most important in predicting the presence of OD in T2DM.

Results: The prevalence of OD was significantly higher in Group 2 than in controls (71.4% vs 30%) and in Group 1 (71.4% vs 43.3%). However, when comparing the TDI scores between Group 1 and 2 the only significant difference was found for the discrimination scale and not for the identification and threshold scales. Brief-IT-QOD scores were significantly higher in Group 2 than in controls. The Random Forest and variable importance algorithms highlighted the relevance of LDL, glycated hemoglobin, type of complication (macrovascular) and age in determining OD in T2DM. The last three variables were included in a nomogram for the prediction of OD risk in T2DM.

Conclusions: T2DM patients with diabetic complications are more frequently affected by OD. Poor glycemic control, LDL values, age and presence of macrovascular complications are the more important factors in determining OD in T2DM patients.

2 型糖尿病患者的嗅觉功能障碍。
背景:2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的糖尿病并发症似乎与嗅觉功能障碍(OD)有关。本研究旨在评估嗅觉障碍在 T2DM 患者中的患病率,并分析其与糖尿病并发症的关系。采用扩展嗅觉测试(TDI)和意大利嗅觉障碍简明问卷--简明-IT-QOD对嗅觉进行评估。T2DM 患者被分为"第一组 "为无并发症患者,"第二组 "为至少有一种糖尿病并发症的患者。采用非参数检验。应用机器学习算法探索哪些变量对预测 T2DM 患者是否出现 OD 最为重要:第 2 组的 OD 患病率明显高于对照组(71.4% 对 30%)和第 1 组(71.4% 对 43.3%)。然而,在比较第 1 组和第 2 组的 TDI 分数时,发现只有辨别量表有显著差异,识别量表和阈值量表没有显著差异。第 2 组的简短-IT-QOD 分数明显高于对照组。随机森林算法和变量重要性算法强调了低密度脂蛋白、糖化血红蛋白、并发症类型(大血管)和年龄在确定 T2DM 患者 OD 方面的相关性。后三个变量被纳入预测 T2DM OD 风险的提名图中:结论:患有糖尿病并发症的 T2DM 患者更容易受到 OD 的影响。血糖控制不佳、低密度脂蛋白值、年龄和是否存在大血管并发症是决定 T2DM 患者 OD 的更重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rhinology
Rhinology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rhinology serves as the official Journal of the International Rhinologic Society and is recognized as one of the journals of the European Rhinologic Society. It offers a prominent platform for disseminating rhinologic research, reviews, position papers, task force reports, and guidelines to an international scientific audience. The journal also boasts the prestigious European Position Paper in Rhinosinusitis (EPOS), a highly influential publication first released in 2005 and subsequently updated in 2007, 2012, and most recently in 2020. Employing a double-blind peer review system, Rhinology welcomes original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信