{"title":"Role of Charge Heterogeneity on Physical Stability of Monoclonal Antibody Biotherapeutic Products.","authors":"Surbhi Gupta, Ankita Dubey, Anurag S Rathore","doi":"10.1007/s11095-024-03730-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Chemical modifications in monoclonal antibodies can change hydrophobicity, charge heterogeneity as well as conformation, which eventually can impact their physical stability. In this study, the effect of the individual charge variants on physical stability and aggregation propensity in two different buffer conditions used during downstream purification was investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The charge variants were separated using semi-preparative cation exchange chromatography and buffer exchanged in the two buffers with pH 6.0 and 3.8. Subsequently each variant was analysed for size heterogeneity using size exclusion chromatography and dynamic light scattering, conformational stability, colloidal stability, and aggregation behaviour under accelerated stability conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Size variants in each charge variant were similar in both pH conditions when analyzed without extended storage. However, conformational stability was lower at pH 3.8 than pH 6.0. All charge variants showed similar apparent melting temperature at pH 6.0. In contrast, at pH 3.8 variants A3, A5, B2, B3 and B4 display lower Tm, suggesting reduced conformational stability. Further, A2, A3 and A5 exhibit reduced colloidal stability at pH 3.8. In general, acidic variants are more prone to aggregation than basic variants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Typical industry practice today is to examine in-process intermediate stability with acidic species and basic species taken as a single category each. We suggest that perhaps stability evaluation needs to be performed at specie level as different acidic or basic species have different stability and this knowledge can be used for clever designing of the downstream process to achieve a stable product.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-024-03730-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Chemical modifications in monoclonal antibodies can change hydrophobicity, charge heterogeneity as well as conformation, which eventually can impact their physical stability. In this study, the effect of the individual charge variants on physical stability and aggregation propensity in two different buffer conditions used during downstream purification was investigated.
Methods: The charge variants were separated using semi-preparative cation exchange chromatography and buffer exchanged in the two buffers with pH 6.0 and 3.8. Subsequently each variant was analysed for size heterogeneity using size exclusion chromatography and dynamic light scattering, conformational stability, colloidal stability, and aggregation behaviour under accelerated stability conditions.
Results: Size variants in each charge variant were similar in both pH conditions when analyzed without extended storage. However, conformational stability was lower at pH 3.8 than pH 6.0. All charge variants showed similar apparent melting temperature at pH 6.0. In contrast, at pH 3.8 variants A3, A5, B2, B3 and B4 display lower Tm, suggesting reduced conformational stability. Further, A2, A3 and A5 exhibit reduced colloidal stability at pH 3.8. In general, acidic variants are more prone to aggregation than basic variants.
Conclusion: Typical industry practice today is to examine in-process intermediate stability with acidic species and basic species taken as a single category each. We suggest that perhaps stability evaluation needs to be performed at specie level as different acidic or basic species have different stability and this knowledge can be used for clever designing of the downstream process to achieve a stable product.