Deploying an asthma dashboard to support quality improvement across a nationally representative sentinel network of 7.6 million people in England.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Mome Mukherjee, Cecilia Okusi, Gavin Jamie, Rachel Byford, Filipa Ferreira, Monica Fletcher, Simon de Lusignan, Aziz Sheikh
{"title":"Deploying an asthma dashboard to support quality improvement across a nationally representative sentinel network of 7.6 million people in England.","authors":"Mome Mukherjee, Cecilia Okusi, Gavin Jamie, Rachel Byford, Filipa Ferreira, Monica Fletcher, Simon de Lusignan, Aziz Sheikh","doi":"10.1038/s41533-024-00377-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Every year, there are ~100,000 hospital admissions for asthma in the UK, many of which are potentially preventable. Evidence suggests that carefully conceptualised and implemented audit and feedback (A&F) cycles have the potential to improve clinical outcomes for those with chronic conditions. We wanted to investigate the technical feasibility of developing a near-real time asthma dashboard to support A&F interventions for asthma management in primary care. We extracted cross-sectional data on asthma from 756 participating GP practices in the Oxford-Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre (RCGP RSC) database in England comprising 7.6 million registered people. Summary indicators for a GP practice were compared to all participating RCGP RSC practices using practice-level data, for the week 6-12th-Mar-2023. A weekly, automated asthma dashboard with features that can support electronic-A&F cycles that compared key asthma indicators for a GP practice to RCGP RSC could be created ( https://tinyurl.com/3ydtrt85 ): 12-weeks-incidence 0.4% vs 0.4%, annual prevalence 6.1% vs 6.7%, inhaled relievers to preventer 1.2 vs 1.1, self-management plan given 83.4% vs 60.8%, annual reviews 36.8% vs 57.3%, prednisolone prescriptions 2.0% vs 3.2%, influenza vaccination 56.6% vs 55.5%, pneumococcal vaccination ever (aged ≥65 years) 90.2% vs 84.1% and current smokers 14.9% vs 14.8%. Across the RCGP RSC, the rate of hospitalisations was 0.024%; comparative data had to be suppressed for the study practice because of small numbers. We have successfully created an automated near real-time asthma dashboard that can be used to support A&F initiatives to improve asthma care and outcomes in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19470,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","volume":"34 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11217285/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41533-024-00377-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Every year, there are ~100,000 hospital admissions for asthma in the UK, many of which are potentially preventable. Evidence suggests that carefully conceptualised and implemented audit and feedback (A&F) cycles have the potential to improve clinical outcomes for those with chronic conditions. We wanted to investigate the technical feasibility of developing a near-real time asthma dashboard to support A&F interventions for asthma management in primary care. We extracted cross-sectional data on asthma from 756 participating GP practices in the Oxford-Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre (RCGP RSC) database in England comprising 7.6 million registered people. Summary indicators for a GP practice were compared to all participating RCGP RSC practices using practice-level data, for the week 6-12th-Mar-2023. A weekly, automated asthma dashboard with features that can support electronic-A&F cycles that compared key asthma indicators for a GP practice to RCGP RSC could be created ( https://tinyurl.com/3ydtrt85 ): 12-weeks-incidence 0.4% vs 0.4%, annual prevalence 6.1% vs 6.7%, inhaled relievers to preventer 1.2 vs 1.1, self-management plan given 83.4% vs 60.8%, annual reviews 36.8% vs 57.3%, prednisolone prescriptions 2.0% vs 3.2%, influenza vaccination 56.6% vs 55.5%, pneumococcal vaccination ever (aged ≥65 years) 90.2% vs 84.1% and current smokers 14.9% vs 14.8%. Across the RCGP RSC, the rate of hospitalisations was 0.024%; comparative data had to be suppressed for the study practice because of small numbers. We have successfully created an automated near real-time asthma dashboard that can be used to support A&F initiatives to improve asthma care and outcomes in primary care.

在英格兰一个由 760 万人组成的具有全国代表性的哨点网络中部署哮喘仪表板,以支持质量改进。
在英国,每年约有 10 万人因哮喘入院治疗,其中很多都是可以预防的。有证据表明,精心构思和实施的审核与反馈(A&F)周期有可能改善慢性病患者的临床疗效。我们希望研究开发近实时哮喘仪表板的技术可行性,以支持初级保健中哮喘管理的 A&F 干预措施。我们从英国牛津大学-皇家全科医师学院研究与监测中心(RCGP RSC)数据库中的 756 个参与全科医生诊所(包括 760 万注册患者)中提取了有关哮喘的横断面数据。利用实践层面的数据,将一家全科医生诊所在2023年3月6日至12日这一周的汇总指标与所有参与RCGP RSC的诊所进行比较。可创建每周自动哮喘仪表板,其功能可支持电子-A&F 循环,将全科医生诊所与 RCGP RSC 的主要哮喘指标进行比较 ( https://tinyurl.com/3ydtrt85 ):12 周发病率为 0.4% vs 0.4%,年发病率为 6.1% vs 6.7%,吸入缓解剂与预防剂的比例为 1.2 vs 1.1,自我管理计划的提供率为 83.4% vs 60.8%,年度复查率为 36.8% vs 57.3%,泼尼松龙处方率为 2.0% vs 3.2%,流感疫苗接种率为 56.6% vs 55.5%,曾经接种过肺炎球菌疫苗(年龄≥65 岁)的比例为 90.2% vs 84.1%,当前吸烟者比例为 14.9% vs 14.8%。在整个 RCGP RSC 中,住院率为 0.024%;由于人数较少,研究实践中的比较数据不得不被抑制。我们成功创建了一个近乎实时的自动化哮喘仪表板,可用于支持 A&F 计划,以改善初级医疗中的哮喘护理和治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine is an open access, online-only, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of the primary care management of respiratory and respiratory-related allergic diseases. Papers published by the journal represent important advances of significance to specialists within the fields of primary care and respiratory medicine. We are particularly interested in receiving papers in relation to the following aspects of respiratory medicine, respiratory-related allergic diseases and tobacco control: epidemiology prevention clinical care service delivery and organisation of healthcare (including implementation science) global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信