Sclerotherapy vs. surgical excision for lymphatic malformations of the head and neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Abdulsalam Alqutub, Noor J Baamir, Zainab Mofti, Faisal Zawawi, Talal Al-Khatib
{"title":"Sclerotherapy vs. surgical excision for lymphatic malformations of the head and neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Abdulsalam Alqutub, Noor J Baamir, Zainab Mofti, Faisal Zawawi, Talal Al-Khatib","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-08793-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Lymphatic malformations (LMs) are abnormal lymphatic vessels with cystic characteristics, categorized as macrocystic, microcystic, or a combination of both. They represent the second most common vascular malformations, and their management involves multidisciplinary approaches based on clinical assessments and imaging studies. LMs manifest as a challenge to medical professionals in the head and neck, posing functional and aesthetic concerns. Our systematic review aims to compare the efficacy of sclerotherapy and surgery for LMs, identifying optimal treatment modalities for each scenario.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched four electronic databases for related studies. Data were extracted from the included studies. We calculated the pooled rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The I<sup>2</sup> test was used to detect heterogeneity. The inclusion of the studies required the following prerequisites: 1- Studies focusing on any lymphatic malformations in the head and neck, whether microcystic, macrocystic, or a mix of both; 2- Studies performed on more than ten patients; 3- All interventions used as surgery, sclerotherapy, or both.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 58 studies in our systematic review, of which 45 were eligible for the meta-analysis. For macrocystic LMs, sodium tetradecyl sulfate (STS) mixed with ethanol and excision achieved the highest complete response rates at (92.9%) and (92.5%), respectively. Surgical excision showed the lowest poor response rate. Polidocanol microfoam had the highest poor response rate (11.1%). In microcystic LMs, combining sclerotherapy with excision showed the highest complete response rate (70.3%) and the lowest poor response rate (1.3%). Picibanil had the lowest complete response rate (9.1%) and the highest rate of poor response (61.4%). In mixed LMs, surgical excision had the highest complete response rate (70.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both surgical excision and STS combined with ethanol are highly effective for treating macrocystic LMs, achieving similar complete response rates. The combination of sclerotherapy and surgical excision demonstrated the best outcomes in microcystic LMs. Surgical excision demonstrates superior efficacy over sclerotherapy for mixed LMs. These findings suggest that excision is generally more effective in achieving complete and excellent responses across all LM subtypes. Further high-quality studies are necessary to standardize and optimize treatment protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08793-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Lymphatic malformations (LMs) are abnormal lymphatic vessels with cystic characteristics, categorized as macrocystic, microcystic, or a combination of both. They represent the second most common vascular malformations, and their management involves multidisciplinary approaches based on clinical assessments and imaging studies. LMs manifest as a challenge to medical professionals in the head and neck, posing functional and aesthetic concerns. Our systematic review aims to compare the efficacy of sclerotherapy and surgery for LMs, identifying optimal treatment modalities for each scenario.

Methods: We searched four electronic databases for related studies. Data were extracted from the included studies. We calculated the pooled rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The I2 test was used to detect heterogeneity. The inclusion of the studies required the following prerequisites: 1- Studies focusing on any lymphatic malformations in the head and neck, whether microcystic, macrocystic, or a mix of both; 2- Studies performed on more than ten patients; 3- All interventions used as surgery, sclerotherapy, or both.

Results: We included 58 studies in our systematic review, of which 45 were eligible for the meta-analysis. For macrocystic LMs, sodium tetradecyl sulfate (STS) mixed with ethanol and excision achieved the highest complete response rates at (92.9%) and (92.5%), respectively. Surgical excision showed the lowest poor response rate. Polidocanol microfoam had the highest poor response rate (11.1%). In microcystic LMs, combining sclerotherapy with excision showed the highest complete response rate (70.3%) and the lowest poor response rate (1.3%). Picibanil had the lowest complete response rate (9.1%) and the highest rate of poor response (61.4%). In mixed LMs, surgical excision had the highest complete response rate (70.3%).

Conclusion: Both surgical excision and STS combined with ethanol are highly effective for treating macrocystic LMs, achieving similar complete response rates. The combination of sclerotherapy and surgical excision demonstrated the best outcomes in microcystic LMs. Surgical excision demonstrates superior efficacy over sclerotherapy for mixed LMs. These findings suggest that excision is generally more effective in achieving complete and excellent responses across all LM subtypes. Further high-quality studies are necessary to standardize and optimize treatment protocols.

Abstract Image

头颈部淋巴畸形的硬化疗法与手术切除:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
目的:淋巴管畸形(LMs)是具有囊性特征的异常淋巴管,分为大囊性、小囊性或两者兼有。淋巴管畸形是第二大最常见的血管畸形,其治疗涉及基于临床评估和成像研究的多学科方法。LM对头颈部的医疗专业人员来说是一项挑战,会带来功能和美观方面的问题。我们的系统性综述旨在比较硬化疗法和手术治疗 LMs 的疗效,确定每种情况下的最佳治疗方式:我们在四个电子数据库中搜索了相关研究。方法:我们检索了四个电子数据库中的相关研究,并从纳入的研究中提取了数据。我们计算了汇总的比率比和 95% 的置信区间 (CI)。使用 I2 检验检测异质性。纳入研究需要满足以下前提条件:1- 研究的重点是头颈部的任何淋巴畸形,无论是微囊性、巨囊性还是两者的混合;2- 对十名以上患者进行的研究;3- 所有干预措施均采用手术、硬化剂注射或两者兼用:我们在系统综述中纳入了 58 项研究,其中 45 项符合荟萃分析的条件。对于巨囊 LM,混合乙醇的十四烷基硫酸钠(STS)和切除术的完全反应率最高,分别为 92.9% 和 92.5%。手术切除的不良反应率最低。Polidocanol 微泡沫的不良反应率最高(11.1%)。在微囊 LM 中,结合硬化剂治疗和切除术的完全反应率最高(70.3%),不良反应率最低(1.3%)。Picibanil 的完全反应率最低(9.1%),不良反应率最高(61.4%)。在混合型 LM 中,手术切除的完全反应率最高(70.3%):结论:手术切除和 STS 联合乙醇治疗大囊性 LM 均非常有效,完全应答率相似。硬化剂注射和手术切除相结合的方法对微囊 LM 的治疗效果最佳。对于混合型 LM,手术切除的疗效优于硬化剂注射疗法。这些研究结果表明,在所有 LM 亚型中,切除术通常能更有效地获得完全和良好的疗效。有必要进一步开展高质量的研究,以规范和优化治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信