Short-duration peripherally inserted central catheters do not alter viscoelastic parameters in healthy dogs.

IF 0.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Leah Morris, Angelica Galezowski, Aylin Atilla, Julie Menard
{"title":"Short-duration peripherally inserted central catheters do not alter viscoelastic parameters in healthy dogs.","authors":"Leah Morris, Angelica Galezowski, Aylin Atilla, Julie Menard","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if short-duration peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) cause a hypercoagulable state in healthy dogs, based on point-of-care viscoelastic coagulation monitor (VCM).</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Ten beagle dogs were randomly and equally allocated into control and PICC groups.</p><p><strong>Procedure: </strong>Control dogs had VCM analysis on whole blood following direct venipuncture before sedation (T0) and 2 h after sedation (T2). In the experimental group, a PICC was placed (medial saphenous or femoral vein) under sedation and removed after 4 h, with measurements before placement (T0) and 2 and 6 h after placement (T2 and T6, respectively). Parametric data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA with Holm-Šídák test for multiple comparisons and paired or unpaired Student's <i>t</i>-test. Nonparametric data were analyzed using Friedman test with Dunn multiple comparison test for Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test, and Mann-Whitney U test for PICC group, control group, and to compare PICC <i>versus</i> control groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clot formation time was longer at T2 <i>versus</i> T6 (<i>P</i> = 0.0342, but not clinically relevant) in the PICC group, with no significant differences between the PICC and control groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and clinical relevance: </strong>Short-term placement of a PICC line did not alter viscoelastic endpoints in healthy beagles.</p>","PeriodicalId":9429,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Veterinary Journal-revue Veterinaire Canadienne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11195506/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Veterinary Journal-revue Veterinaire Canadienne","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine if short-duration peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) cause a hypercoagulable state in healthy dogs, based on point-of-care viscoelastic coagulation monitor (VCM).

Animals: Ten beagle dogs were randomly and equally allocated into control and PICC groups.

Procedure: Control dogs had VCM analysis on whole blood following direct venipuncture before sedation (T0) and 2 h after sedation (T2). In the experimental group, a PICC was placed (medial saphenous or femoral vein) under sedation and removed after 4 h, with measurements before placement (T0) and 2 and 6 h after placement (T2 and T6, respectively). Parametric data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA with Holm-Šídák test for multiple comparisons and paired or unpaired Student's t-test. Nonparametric data were analyzed using Friedman test with Dunn multiple comparison test for Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test, and Mann-Whitney U test for PICC group, control group, and to compare PICC versus control groups, respectively.

Results: Clot formation time was longer at T2 versus T6 (P = 0.0342, but not clinically relevant) in the PICC group, with no significant differences between the PICC and control groups.

Conclusion and clinical relevance: Short-term placement of a PICC line did not alter viscoelastic endpoints in healthy beagles.

短时外周插入中心导管不会改变健康狗的粘弹性参数。
目的根据护理点粘弹性凝血监测仪(VCM)确定短时外周插入中心导管(PICC)是否会导致健康犬出现高凝状态:十只小猎犬被随机平均分配到对照组和 PICC 组:对照组狗在镇静前(T0)和镇静后 2 小时(T2)直接静脉穿刺后对全血进行 VCM 分析。实验组在镇静状态下放置 PICC(隐静脉内侧或股静脉),4 小时后取出,并在放置前(T0)、放置后 2 小时和 6 小时(分别为 T2 和 T6)进行测量。参数数据采用单因素方差分析,多重比较采用 Holm-Šídák 检验,配对或非配对采用学生 t 检验。非参数数据采用弗里德曼检验(Friedman test)和邓恩多重比较检验(Dunn multiple comparison test)、Wilcoxon配对符号秩检验(Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test)以及曼-惠特尼U检验(Mann-Whitney U test)分别对PICC组、对照组以及PICC组与对照组进行比较分析:结果:PICC 组 T2 血栓形成时间长于 T6 血栓形成时间(P = 0.0342,但与临床无关),PICC 组与对照组之间无显著差异:结论和临床意义:短期放置 PICC 管路不会改变健康小猎犬的粘弹性终点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Veterinary Journal (CVJ) provides a forum for the discussion of all matters relevant to the veterinary profession. The mission of the Journal is to educate by informing readers of progress in clinical veterinary medicine, clinical veterinary research, and related fields of endeavor. The key objective of The CVJ is to promote the art and science of veterinary medicine and the betterment of animal health. A report suggesting that animals have been unnecessarily subjected to adverse, stressful, or harsh conditions or treatments will not be processed for publication. Experimental studies using animals will only be considered for publication if the studies have been approved by an institutional animal care committee, or equivalent, and the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care, or equivalent, have been followed by the author(s).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信