Ning Li, Claire A Lavalley, Ko-Ping Chou, Anne E Chuning, Samuel Taylor, Carter M Goldman, Taylor Torres, Rowan Hodson, Robert C Wilson, Jennifer L Stewart, Sahib S Khalsa, Martin P Paulus, Ryan Smith
{"title":"Directed exploration is reduced by an aversive interoceptive state induction in healthy individuals but not in those with affective disorders.","authors":"Ning Li, Claire A Lavalley, Ko-Ping Chou, Anne E Chuning, Samuel Taylor, Carter M Goldman, Taylor Torres, Rowan Hodson, Robert C Wilson, Jennifer L Stewart, Sahib S Khalsa, Martin P Paulus, Ryan Smith","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.19.24309110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Elevated anxiety and uncertainty avoidance are known to exacerbate maladaptive choice in individuals with affective disorders. However, the differential roles of state vs. trait anxiety remain unclear, and underlying computational mechanisms have not been thoroughly characterized. In the present study, we investigated how a somatic (interoceptive) state anxiety induction influences learning and decision-making under uncertainty in individuals with clinically significant levels of trait anxiety. A sample of 58 healthy comparisons (HCs) and 61 individuals with affective disorders displaying elevated anxiety symptoms (iADs; i.e., anxiety and/or depression) completed a previously validated explore-exploit decision task, with and without an added breathing resistance manipulation designed to induce state anxiety. Computational modeling revealed a significant group-by-condition interaction, such that information-seeking (i.e., directed exploration) in HCs was reduced by the anxiety induction (Cohen's <i>d</i> =.47, <i>p</i> =.013), while no change was observed in iADs. The iADs also showed slower learning rates than HCs across conditions (Cohen's <i>d</i> =.52, <i>p</i> =.003), suggesting more persistent uncertainty. These findings highlight a complex interplay between trait anxiety and state anxiety. Specifically, state anxiety may attenuate reflection on uncertainty in healthy individuals, while familiarity with anxious states in those with high trait anxiety may create an insensitivity to this effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11213056/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.19.24309110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Elevated anxiety and uncertainty avoidance are known to exacerbate maladaptive choice in individuals with affective disorders. However, the differential roles of state vs. trait anxiety remain unclear, and underlying computational mechanisms have not been thoroughly characterized. In the present study, we investigated how a somatic (interoceptive) state anxiety induction influences learning and decision-making under uncertainty in individuals with clinically significant levels of trait anxiety. A sample of 58 healthy comparisons (HCs) and 61 individuals with affective disorders displaying elevated anxiety symptoms (iADs; i.e., anxiety and/or depression) completed a previously validated explore-exploit decision task, with and without an added breathing resistance manipulation designed to induce state anxiety. Computational modeling revealed a significant group-by-condition interaction, such that information-seeking (i.e., directed exploration) in HCs was reduced by the anxiety induction (Cohen's d =.47, p =.013), while no change was observed in iADs. The iADs also showed slower learning rates than HCs across conditions (Cohen's d =.52, p =.003), suggesting more persistent uncertainty. These findings highlight a complex interplay between trait anxiety and state anxiety. Specifically, state anxiety may attenuate reflection on uncertainty in healthy individuals, while familiarity with anxious states in those with high trait anxiety may create an insensitivity to this effect.
众所周知,焦虑和对不确定性的回避会加剧情感障碍患者的不良选择。然而,状态焦虑与特质焦虑的不同作用仍不清楚,其背后的计算机制也没有得到彻底描述。在本研究中,我们调查了躯体(感知)状态焦虑诱导如何影响临床上具有显著特质焦虑水平的个体在不确定情况下的学习和决策。由 58 名健康比较者(HCs)和 61 名情感障碍患者(iADs;即抑郁和/或焦虑)组成的样本完成了之前验证过的 "探索-发现 "决策任务,该任务设计了附加呼吸阻力操作以诱导状态焦虑,但也设计了不附加呼吸阻力操作以诱导状态焦虑。计算模型揭示了这样一种模式:iADs 在静态条件下表现出更强的信息搜寻能力(即定向探索能力;Cohen's d =.39, p =.039),但焦虑诱导降低了这种能力。情感障碍组在不同条件下的学习速度也较慢(Cohen's d =.52,p =.003),这表明不确定性更持久。这些发现凸显了特质焦虑和状态焦虑之间复杂的相互作用。具体来说,虽然特质焦虑的升高与持续的不确定性有关,但急性躯体焦虑会自相矛盾地抑制探索行为,从而可能强化情感障碍的不良决策模式。