Causes of Implant Failure and Subsequent Removal: A Retrospective Study in a Hospital Setting.

Lucrezia Paternò Holtzman, Alex Solderer, Chiara Malpassi, Piermario Palattella
{"title":"Causes of Implant Failure and Subsequent Removal: A Retrospective Study in a Hospital Setting.","authors":"Lucrezia Paternò Holtzman, Alex Solderer, Chiara Malpassi, Piermario Palattella","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the causes and risk factors associated with implant removal as observed in a hospital setting over a 20-year timespan to find the most common causes leading to implant removal.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In the present retrospective study, implants removed between 2000 and 2022 were registered and the cause of removal established. All implants were removed by a single operator (P.P.M.) in the Department of Oral Surgery of the George Eastman Dental Hospital in Rome, Italy. Characteristics of removed implants such as implant surface, morphology (bone- versus tissue-level implants), type of restoration (fixed versus removable), mode of retention in the case of fixed restorations (cement- versus screw-retained), and location of the implant (maxillary versus mandibular) were recorded. Patient-level characteristics were also recorded, including patients' systemic health conditions, the medications they were currently taking or had taken, smoking habits, and if they had a previous history of periodontitis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 381 implants in 381 patients were removed in the 20-year timespan. The most frequent cause of removal was peri-implantitis (82.4% of implants), followed by implant malposition and loss of osseointegration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The survival time was not affected by the cause of removal, while bone-level implants had a longer survival time versus tissue-level implants. Maxillary implants had a higher prevalence of peri-implantitis compared to mandibular implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"348-356"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the causes and risk factors associated with implant removal as observed in a hospital setting over a 20-year timespan to find the most common causes leading to implant removal.

Materials and methods: In the present retrospective study, implants removed between 2000 and 2022 were registered and the cause of removal established. All implants were removed by a single operator (P.P.M.) in the Department of Oral Surgery of the George Eastman Dental Hospital in Rome, Italy. Characteristics of removed implants such as implant surface, morphology (bone- versus tissue-level implants), type of restoration (fixed versus removable), mode of retention in the case of fixed restorations (cement- versus screw-retained), and location of the implant (maxillary versus mandibular) were recorded. Patient-level characteristics were also recorded, including patients' systemic health conditions, the medications they were currently taking or had taken, smoking habits, and if they had a previous history of periodontitis.

Results: In total, 381 implants in 381 patients were removed in the 20-year timespan. The most frequent cause of removal was peri-implantitis (82.4% of implants), followed by implant malposition and loss of osseointegration.

Conclusions: The survival time was not affected by the cause of removal, while bone-level implants had a longer survival time versus tissue-level implants. Maxillary implants had a higher prevalence of peri-implantitis compared to mandibular implants.

种植失败和随后拔除的原因:医院环境中的回顾性研究。
尽管种植牙的成功率很高,但由于多种原因导致的种植失败可能需要进行移植。在本回顾性研究中,对 2000 年至 2022 年期间拔除的种植体进行了登记,并确定了拔除原因。所有种植体均由意大利罗马乔治-伊士曼牙科医院口腔外科的一名操作者(PPM)拔除。记录了被拔除种植体的特征,如种植体表面、形态(骨水平种植体还是组织水平种植体)、修复类型(固定修复体还是可摘修复体)、固定修复体的固位方式(粘结固位还是螺钉固位)、种植体的位置(上颌还是下颌)。此外,还记录了患者的特征(全身健康状况和服用的药物、吸烟习惯和牙周炎病史)。在 20 年的时间里,共有 381 名患者的 381 个种植体被移除。最常见的拔除原因是种植体周围炎(82.4%),其次是种植体位置不正和骨结合丧失。种植体的存活时间不受拔除原因的影响,而骨水平种植体的存活时间要长于组织水平种植体。与下颌种植体相比,上颌种植体的种植体周围炎发病率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信