{"title":"Biomechanical Effects of Titanium and Carbon Fiber Reinforced PEEK as Dental Implant Material: A Finite Element Analysis.","authors":"Engin Ediboğlu, Sıdıka Sinem Akdeniz, Esra Beyler","doi":"10.11607/jomi.10954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study is to examine the stresses on the peri-implant bone under occlusal forces of 30% Carbon fiber reinforced PEEK (Cfr-PEEK) and 60% Cfr-PEEK materials that can be used as an alternative to titanium dental implants by finite element analysis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Single-tooth implants of 30% Cfr-PEEK, 60% Cfr-PEEK and titanium were modeled in each of the maxillary anterior, maxilla posterior, mandibular posterior regions. As a result of the applied vertical and oblique forces; Von Misses stress, maximum principal stress and minimum principal stress values and stress distributions in the implant, cortical bone and spongious bone in each of the models were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>30% Cfr-PEEK implants stress in the surrounding bone was higher than titanium and 60% Cfr-PEEK implants. The 60% Cfr-PEEK material displayed lower stress distribution on both cortical and spongious peri-implant bone in all models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Titanium and 60% Cfr- PEEK implants exhibited biomechanically similar behavior and these implants conducted stresses to bone more homogeneous than the 30% Cfr-PEEK implants. Overall, oblique forces had more destructive effect than vertical forces and denser bone structure showed better stress distribution against incoming forces. For the routine use of Cfr-PEEK material as dental implant material; animal and long-term clinical studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.10954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study is to examine the stresses on the peri-implant bone under occlusal forces of 30% Carbon fiber reinforced PEEK (Cfr-PEEK) and 60% Cfr-PEEK materials that can be used as an alternative to titanium dental implants by finite element analysis.
Materials and methods: Single-tooth implants of 30% Cfr-PEEK, 60% Cfr-PEEK and titanium were modeled in each of the maxillary anterior, maxilla posterior, mandibular posterior regions. As a result of the applied vertical and oblique forces; Von Misses stress, maximum principal stress and minimum principal stress values and stress distributions in the implant, cortical bone and spongious bone in each of the models were examined.
Results: 30% Cfr-PEEK implants stress in the surrounding bone was higher than titanium and 60% Cfr-PEEK implants. The 60% Cfr-PEEK material displayed lower stress distribution on both cortical and spongious peri-implant bone in all models.
Conclusion: Titanium and 60% Cfr- PEEK implants exhibited biomechanically similar behavior and these implants conducted stresses to bone more homogeneous than the 30% Cfr-PEEK implants. Overall, oblique forces had more destructive effect than vertical forces and denser bone structure showed better stress distribution against incoming forces. For the routine use of Cfr-PEEK material as dental implant material; animal and long-term clinical studies are needed.