Photobiomodulation Treatment with a Home-Use Device for COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial for Efficacy and Safety.

IF 1.8 Q2 SURGERY
Lew Lim, Nazanin Hosseinkhah, Mark Van Buskirk, Andrea Berk, Genane Loheswaran, Zara Abbaspour, Mahta Karimpoor, Alison Smith, Kai Fai Ho, Abhiram Pushparaj, Michael Zahavi, Alexander White, Jonathan Rubine, Brian Zidel, Christopher Henderson, Russell Gene Clayton, David Roy Tingley, David Joseph Miller, Mahroo Karimpoor, Michael R Hamblin
{"title":"Photobiomodulation Treatment with a Home-Use Device for COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial for Efficacy and Safety.","authors":"Lew Lim, Nazanin Hosseinkhah, Mark Van Buskirk, Andrea Berk, Genane Loheswaran, Zara Abbaspour, Mahta Karimpoor, Alison Smith, Kai Fai Ho, Abhiram Pushparaj, Michael Zahavi, Alexander White, Jonathan Rubine, Brian Zidel, Christopher Henderson, Russell Gene Clayton, David Roy Tingley, David Joseph Miller, Mahroo Karimpoor, Michael R Hamblin","doi":"10.1089/pho.2023.0179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) using devices to deliver red and/or near-infrared light to tissues has shown promising effects in clinical settings for respiratory diseases, including potential benefits in managing symptoms associated with COVID-19. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To determine if at-home self-administered PBMT for patients with COVID-19 is safe and effective. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) carried out at home during the COVID-19 pandemic (September 2020 to August 2021). The treatment group self-administered the Vielight RX Plus PBMT device (635 nm intranasal and 810 nm chest LEDs) and were monitored remotely. Eligible patients scored 4-7 (out of 7) for severity on the Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptom Survey (WURSS-44). Patients were randomized equally to Control group receiving standard-of-care (SOC) only or Treatment group receiving SOC plus PBMT. The device was used for 20 min 2X/day for 5 days and, subsequently, once daily for 30 days. The primary end-point was time-to-recovery (days) based on WURSS-44 question 1, \"How sick do you feel today?\". Subgroup analysis was performed, and Kaplan-Meier and Cox Proportional Hazards analysis were employed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> One hundred and ninety-nine eligible patients (18-65 years old) were divided into two subgroups as follows: 136 patients with 0-7 days of symptoms at baseline and 63 patients with 8-12 days of symptoms. Those with 0-7 days of symptoms at baseline recovered significantly faster with PBMT. The median for Treatment group was 18 days [95% confidence interval (CI), 13-20] versus the Control group 21 days (95% CI, 15-28), <i>p</i> = 0.050. The treatment:control hazard ratio was 1.495 (95% CI, 0.996-2.243), <i>p</i> = 0.054. Patients with symptom duration ≥7 days did not show any significant improvement. No deaths or severe adverse events (SAEs) occurred in the Treatment group, whereas there was 1 death and 3 SAEs requiring hospitalization in the Control group. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Patients with ≤7 days of COVID-19 symptoms recovered significantly faster with PBMT compared to SOC. Beyond 7 days, PBMT showed no superiority over SOC. <b><i>Trial Registration:</i></b> ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04418505.</p>","PeriodicalId":94169,"journal":{"name":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","volume":"42 6","pages":"393-403"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2023.0179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) using devices to deliver red and/or near-infrared light to tissues has shown promising effects in clinical settings for respiratory diseases, including potential benefits in managing symptoms associated with COVID-19. Objective: To determine if at-home self-administered PBMT for patients with COVID-19 is safe and effective. Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial (RCT) carried out at home during the COVID-19 pandemic (September 2020 to August 2021). The treatment group self-administered the Vielight RX Plus PBMT device (635 nm intranasal and 810 nm chest LEDs) and were monitored remotely. Eligible patients scored 4-7 (out of 7) for severity on the Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptom Survey (WURSS-44). Patients were randomized equally to Control group receiving standard-of-care (SOC) only or Treatment group receiving SOC plus PBMT. The device was used for 20 min 2X/day for 5 days and, subsequently, once daily for 30 days. The primary end-point was time-to-recovery (days) based on WURSS-44 question 1, "How sick do you feel today?". Subgroup analysis was performed, and Kaplan-Meier and Cox Proportional Hazards analysis were employed. Results: One hundred and ninety-nine eligible patients (18-65 years old) were divided into two subgroups as follows: 136 patients with 0-7 days of symptoms at baseline and 63 patients with 8-12 days of symptoms. Those with 0-7 days of symptoms at baseline recovered significantly faster with PBMT. The median for Treatment group was 18 days [95% confidence interval (CI), 13-20] versus the Control group 21 days (95% CI, 15-28), p = 0.050. The treatment:control hazard ratio was 1.495 (95% CI, 0.996-2.243), p = 0.054. Patients with symptom duration ≥7 days did not show any significant improvement. No deaths or severe adverse events (SAEs) occurred in the Treatment group, whereas there was 1 death and 3 SAEs requiring hospitalization in the Control group. Conclusions: Patients with ≤7 days of COVID-19 symptoms recovered significantly faster with PBMT compared to SOC. Beyond 7 days, PBMT showed no superiority over SOC. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04418505.

使用家用设备对 COVID-19 进行光生物调节治疗:关于疗效和安全性的随机对照试验
背景:光生物调节疗法(PBMT)使用设备向组织输送红光和/或近红外光,在呼吸系统疾病的临床治疗中显示出良好的效果,包括在控制 COVID-19 相关症状方面的潜在益处。研究目的确定针对 COVID-19 患者的家庭自控 PBMT 是否安全有效。方法:这是一项随机对照试验:这是一项随机对照试验(RCT),在 COVID-19 大流行期间(2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 8 月)在家中进行。治疗组自行使用 Vielight RX Plus PBMT 设备(635 nm 鼻内 LED 和 810 nm 胸前 LED),并接受远程监控。符合条件的患者在威斯康星上呼吸道症状调查(WURSS-44)中的严重程度为 4-7(满分 7 分)。患者被平均随机分配到仅接受标准护理 (SOC) 的对照组或接受 SOC 加 PBMT 的治疗组。该设备每天使用 2 次,每次 20 分钟,共使用 5 天,随后每天使用一次,共使用 30 天。主要终点是根据 WURSS-44 问题 1 "您今天感觉有多难受?"得出的康复时间(天数)。进行了亚组分析,并采用了卡普兰-梅耶分析和考克斯比例危害分析。研究结果符合条件的 199 名患者(18-65 岁)被分为以下两个亚组:136 名基线症状为 0-7 天的患者和 63 名症状为 8-12 天的患者。基线症状为 0-7 天的患者在接受 PBMT 治疗后恢复得更快。治疗组的中位数为 18 天[95% 置信区间 (CI),13-20],而对照组为 21 天(95% CI,15-28),P = 0.050。治疗组与对照组的危险比为 1.495(95% CI,0.996-2.243),P = 0.054。症状持续时间≥7 天的患者症状没有明显改善。治疗组未出现死亡或严重不良事件(SAE),而对照组出现了 1 例死亡和 3 例需要住院治疗的 SAE。结论出现 COVID-19 症状≤7 天的患者与 SOC 相比,PBMT 的恢复速度明显更快。7天后,PBMT与SOC相比没有优势。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04418505。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery Editor-in-Chief: Michael R Hamblin, PhD Co-Editor-in-Chief: Heidi Abrahamse, PhD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信