Comparative Study of Treatment Outcome with Tenofovir Alafenamide and Entecavir in Patients with HBV Related Acute on Chronic Liver Failure.

Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ Pub Date : 2024-07-01
M A U Somon, M A M Shwapnil, C R Debnath, S M Noor-E-Alam, A J Tarafdar, M F Ahmad, M Ashrafujjaman, K R A Jhily, M S Ashiq, M Z Hasan
{"title":"Comparative Study of Treatment Outcome with Tenofovir Alafenamide and Entecavir in Patients with HBV Related Acute on Chronic Liver Failure.","authors":"M A U Somon, M A M Shwapnil, C R Debnath, S M Noor-E-Alam, A J Tarafdar, M F Ahmad, M Ashrafujjaman, K R A Jhily, M S Ashiq, M Z Hasan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Major causes of acute insult in Hepatitis B virus related acute on chronic liver failure in the Asian region are reactivation of Hepatitis B virus and super infection with hepatitis A and E virus (ACLF). Anti viral therapy should be started as soon as possible in the ACLF patients at presentation while waiting for confirmation by HBV DNA level. This randomized controlled trial was carried out at the Department of Hepatology, BSMMU, Bangladesh from September 2019 to august 2020 with Hepatitis B virus related ACLF patient. This trial was conducted among twenty seven HBV acute on chronic liver failure patient to compare Child Turcotte pugh (CTP) score, Model for end stage liver disease (MELD) score, Asia Pacific Association for study of Liver (APASL) ACLF Research consortium (AARC) score, survival of the patients and HBV DNA level at 3 months with antiviral therapy between tenofovir alafenamide (25mg) and entecavir (0.5mg) group. CTP score, MELD score and AARC score were significantly (p<0.05) decline from baseline to all subsequent follow-up at 1st (at 7 days), 2nd (at 14 days), 3rd (at 30 days) and 4th (at 90 days) in each group but non significant (p>0.05) difference occurred between two group. All twenty seven patients had detectable HBV DNA level at pre-treatment and all survived patients became undectable at 4th, 90 days follow-up. Total 10 patients (37.07%) were survived at 90 days follow-up, out of them seven patients (70.0%) were in tenofovir alafenamide group and three patients (30.0%) were in entecavir group which was statistically significant (p<0.05) in between two group. Hepatic encephalopathy and hepatorenal syndrome were most common causes of death in both groups. Both drugs tenofovir alafenamide and entecavir significantly improves liver functions but the former one is superior regarding survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":94148,"journal":{"name":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","volume":"33 3","pages":"696-705"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Major causes of acute insult in Hepatitis B virus related acute on chronic liver failure in the Asian region are reactivation of Hepatitis B virus and super infection with hepatitis A and E virus (ACLF). Anti viral therapy should be started as soon as possible in the ACLF patients at presentation while waiting for confirmation by HBV DNA level. This randomized controlled trial was carried out at the Department of Hepatology, BSMMU, Bangladesh from September 2019 to august 2020 with Hepatitis B virus related ACLF patient. This trial was conducted among twenty seven HBV acute on chronic liver failure patient to compare Child Turcotte pugh (CTP) score, Model for end stage liver disease (MELD) score, Asia Pacific Association for study of Liver (APASL) ACLF Research consortium (AARC) score, survival of the patients and HBV DNA level at 3 months with antiviral therapy between tenofovir alafenamide (25mg) and entecavir (0.5mg) group. CTP score, MELD score and AARC score were significantly (p<0.05) decline from baseline to all subsequent follow-up at 1st (at 7 days), 2nd (at 14 days), 3rd (at 30 days) and 4th (at 90 days) in each group but non significant (p>0.05) difference occurred between two group. All twenty seven patients had detectable HBV DNA level at pre-treatment and all survived patients became undectable at 4th, 90 days follow-up. Total 10 patients (37.07%) were survived at 90 days follow-up, out of them seven patients (70.0%) were in tenofovir alafenamide group and three patients (30.0%) were in entecavir group which was statistically significant (p<0.05) in between two group. Hepatic encephalopathy and hepatorenal syndrome were most common causes of death in both groups. Both drugs tenofovir alafenamide and entecavir significantly improves liver functions but the former one is superior regarding survival.

与 HBV 相关的急性和慢性肝衰竭患者使用替诺福韦-阿拉非那胺和恩替卡韦治疗效果的比较研究。
在亚洲地区,乙型肝炎病毒相关急性和慢性肝功能衰竭的主要病因是乙型肝炎病毒再活化以及甲型和戊型肝炎病毒超级感染(ACLF)。ACLF 患者在就诊时应尽快开始抗病毒治疗,同时等待 HBV DNA 水平的确认。这项随机对照试验于 2019 年 9 月至 2020 年 8 月在孟加拉国 BSMMU 肝病学系进行,对象是乙型肝炎病毒相关 ACLF 患者。该试验在 27 名急性乙肝病毒相关慢性肝衰竭患者中进行,比较替诺福韦-阿拉非酰胺(25 毫克)组和恩替卡韦(0.5 毫克)组在接受抗病毒治疗 3 个月后的儿童特科特-普(CTP)评分、肝病终末期模型(MELD)评分、亚太肝病研究协会(APASL)ACLF 研究联盟(AARC)评分、患者存活率和 HBV DNA 水平。两组患者的 CTP 评分、MELD 评分和 AARC 评分差异显著(P0.05)。所有 27 名患者在治疗前均可检测到 HBV DNA 水平,所有存活患者在第 4 次和第 90 天随访时均检测不到 HBV DNA 水平。共有 10 名患者(37.07%)在 90 天的随访中存活,其中 7 名患者(70.0%)属于替诺福韦-阿拉非那胺组,3 名患者(30.0%)属于恩替卡韦组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信