Dietetic Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A National Survey of Dietary Approaches and Decision-making Factors.

Arkadeep Dhali, Nick Trott, Mohamed G Shiha, Imran Aziz, Christian C Shaw, Rachel L Buckle, David S Sanders
{"title":"Dietetic Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A National Survey of Dietary Approaches and Decision-making Factors.","authors":"Arkadeep Dhali, Nick Trott, Mohamed G Shiha, Imran Aziz, Christian C Shaw, Rachel L Buckle, David S Sanders","doi":"10.15403/jgld-5466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>There has been a growing emphasis on dietary therapies for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Furthermore, there has been an evolving evidence base for the low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) diet, gluten-free diet (GFD), and lactose-free diet. This study examines the dietary approaches employed and the factors influencing dietetic decision-making for IBS interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants, including registered dietitians and nutritionists, were recruited from diverse healthcare settings at the point of registration for the 4th Sheffield National Dietetic Gastroenterology Symposium, 2023. A 15-question online survey investigated the practices of dietitians and nutritionists in managing IBS patients, covering dietary approaches, decision-making factors, and patient education. The evidence base for different dietary interventions was provided and a follow-up survey assessed symposium attendees, views on current IBS dietary practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 731 respondents, primarily registered dietitians (93%) and females (93%), 54% spent 10-50% of clinic time on IBS. Respondents noted that a GFD (34%), low lactose (32%), and traditional dietary advice (TDA) (18%) were the most frequently used dietary interventions that patients try before seeking professional advice. Delegates were asked to rank their dietary intervention preferences pre- and post-meeting (after the evidence base had been presented): TDA pre-meeting 75% versus post-meeting 87% (p=0.04), fibre modification 59% versus 6% (p<0.0001), low FODMAP 25% versus 10% (p=0.0001), low lactose 12% versus 62% (p<0.0001) and GFD 6% to 23% (p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TDA remains the choice of diet for dietitians. After our educational event, the use of low-lactose and gluten-free diet significantly increased. Factors influencing the decision-making process were based on patient acceptability, counselling time, supporting evidence base and dietary triggers.</p>","PeriodicalId":94081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","volume":"33 2","pages":"177-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld-5466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: There has been a growing emphasis on dietary therapies for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Furthermore, there has been an evolving evidence base for the low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) diet, gluten-free diet (GFD), and lactose-free diet. This study examines the dietary approaches employed and the factors influencing dietetic decision-making for IBS interventions.

Methods: Participants, including registered dietitians and nutritionists, were recruited from diverse healthcare settings at the point of registration for the 4th Sheffield National Dietetic Gastroenterology Symposium, 2023. A 15-question online survey investigated the practices of dietitians and nutritionists in managing IBS patients, covering dietary approaches, decision-making factors, and patient education. The evidence base for different dietary interventions was provided and a follow-up survey assessed symposium attendees, views on current IBS dietary practices.

Results: Out of 731 respondents, primarily registered dietitians (93%) and females (93%), 54% spent 10-50% of clinic time on IBS. Respondents noted that a GFD (34%), low lactose (32%), and traditional dietary advice (TDA) (18%) were the most frequently used dietary interventions that patients try before seeking professional advice. Delegates were asked to rank their dietary intervention preferences pre- and post-meeting (after the evidence base had been presented): TDA pre-meeting 75% versus post-meeting 87% (p=0.04), fibre modification 59% versus 6% (p<0.0001), low FODMAP 25% versus 10% (p=0.0001), low lactose 12% versus 62% (p<0.0001) and GFD 6% to 23% (p<0.0001).

Conclusions: TDA remains the choice of diet for dietitians. After our educational event, the use of low-lactose and gluten-free diet significantly increased. Factors influencing the decision-making process were based on patient acceptability, counselling time, supporting evidence base and dietary triggers.

肠易激综合征的饮食管理:关于饮食方法和决策因素的全国调查。
背景和目的:人们越来越重视肠易激综合征(IBS)的饮食疗法。此外,低发酵性低聚糖、双糖、单糖和多元醇(FODMAP)饮食、无麸质饮食(GFD)和无乳糖饮食的证据基础也在不断发展。本研究探讨了肠易激综合征干预所采用的饮食方法以及影响营养师决策的因素:在 2023 年第四届谢菲尔德全国营养学胃肠病学研讨会注册时,从不同的医疗机构招募了包括注册营养师和营养学家在内的参与者。一项包含 15 个问题的在线调查调查了营养师和营养学家在管理肠易激综合征患者方面的做法,调查内容包括饮食方法、决策因素和患者教育。调查还提供了不同饮食干预措施的证据基础,并通过后续调查评估了研讨会与会者对当前肠易激综合征饮食实践的看法:结果:在 731 位受访者中,主要是注册营养师(93%)和女性(93%),54% 的受访者将 10-50% 的门诊时间用于治疗肠易激综合征。受访者指出,GFD(34%)、低乳糖(32%)和传统饮食建议(TDA)(18%)是患者在寻求专业建议前最常尝试的饮食干预措施。与会代表被要求在会前和会后(在介绍了证据基础之后)对其饮食干预偏好进行排序:会前 75% 对会后 87%(P=0.04),纤维素调整 59% 对会后 6%(P结论:TDA 仍是营养师的首选饮食。在我们的教育活动之后,低乳糖和无麸质饮食的使用率明显提高。影响决策过程的因素包括患者的接受程度、咨询时间、支持证据基础和饮食诱因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信