Developing a multi-modular assembled prime editing (mPE) system improved precise multi-base insertion efficiency in dicots.

Pengjun Lu, Erwei Zuo, Jianbin Yan
{"title":"Developing a multi-modular assembled prime editing (mPE) system improved precise multi-base insertion efficiency in dicots.","authors":"Pengjun Lu, Erwei Zuo, Jianbin Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.jare.2024.06.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Prime Editing (PE) system is a precise and versatile genome editing tool with great potential in plant breeding and plant synthetic biology. However, low PE efficiency severely restricts its application, especially in dicots. PE can introduce small tags to trace target protein or cis-element to regulate gene transcription which is an expertise superior to other gene editing tools. Owing to low efficiency, PE adaption in stably transformed Arabidopsis is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the issue of low PE efficiency in dicots and develop systematic solutions to improve it. Currently, PE in dicots is undetectable and inconsistent, and this study seeks to address it. Split PE into several parts showed better performance in some target sites in mammal cells. We plan to discover the optimal split PE combination in dicot.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted large-scale transformation experiments in dicot model plants Arabidopsis thaliana (At) and Nicotiana benthamiana (Nb) by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation with deep amplicon sequencing (0.2-0.5 million clean total reads).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The editing efficiency decreased upon using a fused reverse transcriptase (RT) or an extended pegRNA separately and further decreased dramatically when these were used together. With the help of the pol II strategy to express PE gRNA (pegRNA), we named the most effective split PE combination as a multi-modular assembled prime editing system (mPE). mPE exhibited improved precise editing efficiency on most gene sites with various editing types, ranging from 1.3-fold to 1288.5-fold and achieved PE on some sites that could not be edited by original PE2. Especially, mPE showed superiority for multi-base insertion with an average improvement of 197.9-fold.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The original PE architecture strongly inhibited the cleavage activity of Cas9. Split PE improved PE efficiency extensively and was in favor of introducing small insertions in dicot plants, indicating that different PE variants might have their own expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":94063,"journal":{"name":"Journal of advanced research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of advanced research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2024.06.021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Prime Editing (PE) system is a precise and versatile genome editing tool with great potential in plant breeding and plant synthetic biology. However, low PE efficiency severely restricts its application, especially in dicots. PE can introduce small tags to trace target protein or cis-element to regulate gene transcription which is an expertise superior to other gene editing tools. Owing to low efficiency, PE adaption in stably transformed Arabidopsis is lacking.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the issue of low PE efficiency in dicots and develop systematic solutions to improve it. Currently, PE in dicots is undetectable and inconsistent, and this study seeks to address it. Split PE into several parts showed better performance in some target sites in mammal cells. We plan to discover the optimal split PE combination in dicot.

Methods: We conducted large-scale transformation experiments in dicot model plants Arabidopsis thaliana (At) and Nicotiana benthamiana (Nb) by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation with deep amplicon sequencing (0.2-0.5 million clean total reads).

Results: The editing efficiency decreased upon using a fused reverse transcriptase (RT) or an extended pegRNA separately and further decreased dramatically when these were used together. With the help of the pol II strategy to express PE gRNA (pegRNA), we named the most effective split PE combination as a multi-modular assembled prime editing system (mPE). mPE exhibited improved precise editing efficiency on most gene sites with various editing types, ranging from 1.3-fold to 1288.5-fold and achieved PE on some sites that could not be edited by original PE2. Especially, mPE showed superiority for multi-base insertion with an average improvement of 197.9-fold.

Conclusion: The original PE architecture strongly inhibited the cleavage activity of Cas9. Split PE improved PE efficiency extensively and was in favor of introducing small insertions in dicot plants, indicating that different PE variants might have their own expertise.

Abstract Image

开发多模块组装素材编辑(mPE)系统提高了双子叶植物的精确多碱基插入效率。
简介Prime Editing(PE)系统是一种精确而多用途的基因组编辑工具,在植物育种和植物合成生物学中具有巨大潜力。然而,PE 的低效率严重限制了它的应用,尤其是在双子叶植物中。PE 可以引入小标签追踪目标蛋白或顺式元件,从而调控基因转录,其专业性优于其他基因编辑工具。由于效率较低,PE 在稳定转化的拟南芥中的适应性还很欠缺:本研究旨在调查双子叶植物 PE 效率低的问题,并制定系统的解决方案来改善这一问题。目前,双子叶植物中的 PE 无法检测且不一致,本研究旨在解决这一问题。在哺乳动物细胞中,将 PE 分成几个部分在某些靶位点的表现更好。我们计划在双子叶植物中发现最佳的 PE 分裂组合:方法:我们通过农杆菌介导的转化方法,在双子叶模式植物拟南芥(At)和烟草(Nb)中进行了大规模转化实验,并进行了深度扩增片段测序(20-50 万个纯文本总读数):结果:单独使用融合反转录酶(RT)或延长的pegRNA时,编辑效率会降低,而同时使用这两种酶或延长的pegRNA时,编辑效率会进一步大幅降低。借助 pol II 表达 PE gRNA(pegRNA)的策略,我们将最有效的拆分 PE 组合命名为多模块组装质粒编辑系统(mPE)。mPE 在不同编辑类型的大多数基因位点上显示出更高的精确编辑效率,从 1.3 倍到 1288.5 倍不等,并在一些原始 PE2 无法编辑的位点上实现了 PE。特别是,mPE 在多碱基插入方面表现出优势,平均提高了 197.9 倍:结论:原始 PE 结构强烈抑制了 Cas9 的切割活性。结论:原始 PE 结构强烈抑制了 Cas9 的切割活性,而分体 PE 则广泛提高了 PE 的效率,有利于在双子叶植物中引入小的插入片段,这表明不同的 PE 变体可能有各自的专长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信