Association between acute peripancreatic fluid collections and early readmission in acute pancreatitis: A propensity-matched analysis.

Hassam Ali, Faisal Inayat, Waqas Rasheed, Arslan Afzal, Ahtshamullah Chaudhry, Pratik Patel, Attiq Ur Rehman, Muhammad Sajeel Anwar, Gul Nawaz, Muhammad Sohaib Afzal, Amir H Sohail, Subanandhini Subramanium, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Deepa Budh, Babu P Mohan, Douglas G Adler
{"title":"Association between acute peripancreatic fluid collections and early readmission in acute pancreatitis: A propensity-matched analysis.","authors":"Hassam Ali, Faisal Inayat, Waqas Rasheed, Arslan Afzal, Ahtshamullah Chaudhry, Pratik Patel, Attiq Ur Rehman, Muhammad Sajeel Anwar, Gul Nawaz, Muhammad Sohaib Afzal, Amir H Sohail, Subanandhini Subramanium, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Deepa Budh, Babu P Mohan, Douglas G Adler","doi":"10.5493/wjem.v14.i2.92052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) frequently experience hospital readmissions, posing a significant burden to healthcare systems. Acute peripancreatic fluid collection (APFC) may negatively impact the clinical course of AP. It could worsen symptoms and potentially lead to additional complications. However, clinical evidence regarding the specific association between APFC and early readmission in AP remains scarce. Understanding the link between APFC and readmission may help improve clinical care for AP patients and reduce healthcare costs.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the association between APFC and 30-day readmission in patients with AP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study is based on the Nationwide Readmission Database for 2016-2019. Patients with a primary diagnosis of AP were identified. Participants were categorized into those with and without APFC. A 1:1 propensity score matching for age, gender, and Elixhauser comorbidities was performed. The primary outcome was early readmission rates. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of inpatient complications and healthcare utilization. Unadjusted analyses used Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> and <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> tests, while Cox regression models assessed 30-day readmission risks and reported them as adjusted hazard ratios (aHR). Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests verified readmission risks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 673059 patients with the principal diagnosis of AP were included. Of these, 5.1% had APFC on initial admission. After propensity score matching, each cohort consisted of 33914 patients. Those with APFC showed a higher incidence of inpatient complications, including septic shock (3.1% <i>vs</i> 1.3%, <i>P</i> < 0.001), portal venous thrombosis (4.4% <i>vs</i> 0.8%, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and mechanical ventilation (1.8% <i>vs</i> 0.9%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The length of stay (LOS) was longer for APFC patients [4 (3-7) <i>vs</i> 3 (2-5) days, <i>P</i> < 0.001], as were hospital charges ($29451 <i>vs</i> $24418, <i>P</i> < 0.001). For 30-day readmissions, APFC patients had a higher rate (15.7% <i>vs</i> 6.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and a longer median readmission LOS (4 <i>vs</i> 3 days, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The APFC group also had higher readmission charges ($28282 <i>vs</i> $22865, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The presence of APFC increased the risk of readmission twofold (aHR 2.52, 95% confidence interval: 2.40-2.65, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The independent risk factors for 30-day readmission included female gender, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index ≥ 3, chronic pulmonary diseases, chronic renal disease, protein-calorie malnutrition, substance use disorder, depression, portal and splenic venous thrombosis, and certain endoscopic procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Developing APFC during index hospitalization for AP is linked to higher readmission rates, more inpatient complications, longer LOS, and increased healthcare costs. Knowing predictors of readmission can help target high-risk patients, reducing healthcare burdens.</p>","PeriodicalId":75340,"journal":{"name":"World journal of experimental medicine","volume":"14 2","pages":"92052"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11212740/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of experimental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v14.i2.92052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) frequently experience hospital readmissions, posing a significant burden to healthcare systems. Acute peripancreatic fluid collection (APFC) may negatively impact the clinical course of AP. It could worsen symptoms and potentially lead to additional complications. However, clinical evidence regarding the specific association between APFC and early readmission in AP remains scarce. Understanding the link between APFC and readmission may help improve clinical care for AP patients and reduce healthcare costs.

Aim: To evaluate the association between APFC and 30-day readmission in patients with AP.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study is based on the Nationwide Readmission Database for 2016-2019. Patients with a primary diagnosis of AP were identified. Participants were categorized into those with and without APFC. A 1:1 propensity score matching for age, gender, and Elixhauser comorbidities was performed. The primary outcome was early readmission rates. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of inpatient complications and healthcare utilization. Unadjusted analyses used Mann-Whitney U and χ 2 tests, while Cox regression models assessed 30-day readmission risks and reported them as adjusted hazard ratios (aHR). Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests verified readmission risks.

Results: A total of 673059 patients with the principal diagnosis of AP were included. Of these, 5.1% had APFC on initial admission. After propensity score matching, each cohort consisted of 33914 patients. Those with APFC showed a higher incidence of inpatient complications, including septic shock (3.1% vs 1.3%, P < 0.001), portal venous thrombosis (4.4% vs 0.8%, P < 0.001), and mechanical ventilation (1.8% vs 0.9%, P < 0.001). The length of stay (LOS) was longer for APFC patients [4 (3-7) vs 3 (2-5) days, P < 0.001], as were hospital charges ($29451 vs $24418, P < 0.001). For 30-day readmissions, APFC patients had a higher rate (15.7% vs 6.5%, P < 0.001) and a longer median readmission LOS (4 vs 3 days, P < 0.001). The APFC group also had higher readmission charges ($28282 vs $22865, P < 0.001). The presence of APFC increased the risk of readmission twofold (aHR 2.52, 95% confidence interval: 2.40-2.65, P < 0.001). The independent risk factors for 30-day readmission included female gender, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index ≥ 3, chronic pulmonary diseases, chronic renal disease, protein-calorie malnutrition, substance use disorder, depression, portal and splenic venous thrombosis, and certain endoscopic procedures.

Conclusion: Developing APFC during index hospitalization for AP is linked to higher readmission rates, more inpatient complications, longer LOS, and increased healthcare costs. Knowing predictors of readmission can help target high-risk patients, reducing healthcare burdens.

急性胰腺炎患者急性胰周积液与早期再入院之间的关系:倾向匹配分析
背景:急性胰腺炎(AP)患者经常再次入院,给医疗保健系统带来沉重负担。急性胰周积液(APFC)可能会对急性胰腺炎的临床病程产生负面影响。它可能会加重症状,并可能导致更多并发症。然而,有关急性胰周积液与急性胰腺炎早期再入院之间具体关系的临床证据仍然很少。了解 APFC 与再入院之间的关系有助于改善 AP 患者的临床治疗并降低医疗成本。目的:评估 APFC 与 AP 患者 30 天再入院之间的关系:这项回顾性队列研究基于2016-2019年全国再入院数据库。研究确定了主要诊断为 AP 的患者。参与者被分为有 APFC 和无 APFC 两类。对年龄、性别和埃利克豪斯合并症进行1:1倾向得分匹配。主要结果是早期再入院率。次要结果包括住院并发症发生率和医疗保健使用率。未调整分析采用 Mann-Whitney U 和 χ 2 检验,而 Cox 回归模型评估了 30 天再入院风险,并以调整后的危险比(aHR)进行报告。卡普兰-梅耶曲线和对数秩检验验证了再入院风险:共纳入 673 059 名主要诊断为 AP 的患者。其中,5.1%的患者在初次入院时患有 APFC。经过倾向评分匹配后,每个队列由 33914 名患者组成。APFC患者的住院并发症发生率较高,包括脓毒性休克(3.1% vs 1.3%,P<0.001)、门静脉血栓(4.4% vs 0.8%,P<0.001)和机械通气(1.8% vs 0.9%,P<0.001)。APFC患者的住院时间(LOS)更长[4(3-7)天 vs 3(2-5)天,P < 0.001],住院费用(29451美元 vs 24418美元,P < 0.001)也更高。就 30 天再入院率而言,APFC 患者的再入院率更高(15.7% vs 6.5%,P < 0.001),再入院时间中位数更长(4 vs 3 天,P < 0.001)。APFC 组的再入院费用也更高(28282 美元 vs 22865 美元,P < 0.001)。APFC 的存在使再入院风险增加了两倍(aHR 2.52,95% 置信区间:2.40-2.65,P <0.001)。30天再入院的独立风险因素包括女性性别、Elixhauser合并症指数≥3、慢性肺部疾病、慢性肾病、蛋白质-热量营养不良、药物使用障碍、抑郁症、门静脉和脾静脉血栓以及某些内窥镜手术:结论:在因 AP 住院期间出现 APFC 与较高的再入院率、较多的住院并发症、较长的住院时间和较高的医疗费用有关。了解再入院的预测因素有助于锁定高风险患者,减轻医疗负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信