HYPERTENSION AND DIABETES MELLITUS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH DEEP VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM: A CASE CONTROL STUDY.

S P Ogundeji, F A Fasola, T R Kotila
{"title":"HYPERTENSION AND DIABETES MELLITUS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH DEEP VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM: A CASE CONTROL STUDY.","authors":"S P Ogundeji, F A Fasola, T R Kotila","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Identifying risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) is useful in deciding thromboprophylaxis for VTE. A retrospective study had shown an association between hypertension and diabetes mellitus with VTE in our population. The objective of this study was to confirm these findings and to determine if the complete blood count and coagulation tests can also be useful parameters in stratifying VTE patients for prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a gender and age matched prospective case-control study of 45 Doppler's confirmed DVT and 43 apparently healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Identified risk factors included history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, previous DVT, recent surgery, recent trauma, malignancy, sepsis, and immobility. The cases had a significantly lower mean haematocrit (33±7.4% vs 38±4.6%, p<0.001). Though no differences were observed in leucocyte and platelet counts between cases and controls but stratification as leucocytosis vs leucopaenia (P=0.003) and thrombocytosis vs thrombocytopaenia (P=0.045) differed between both groups. Also, the International normalized ratio (INR) was higher in cases (1.1±0.2 vs 1.0±0.1;P=0.001), hypercoagulable state (INR<0.9) and hypocoagulable state (INR>1.2) were observed in 4.4% and 28.9% of cases respectively but not in controls (P <0.001). Also, aPTT>40 seconds was seen in 4.4% vs 4.7% of cases and controls respectively and aPTT< 30 seconds in 22% of cases but not in controls (P =0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hypertension and diabetes mellitus are identified risk factors not traditionally associated with DVT. These in addition to a complete blood count and coagulation tests can be useful in stratifying patients for prophylaxis in our population and other similar communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":72221,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11205718/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Identifying risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) is useful in deciding thromboprophylaxis for VTE. A retrospective study had shown an association between hypertension and diabetes mellitus with VTE in our population. The objective of this study was to confirm these findings and to determine if the complete blood count and coagulation tests can also be useful parameters in stratifying VTE patients for prophylaxis.

Methods: This is a gender and age matched prospective case-control study of 45 Doppler's confirmed DVT and 43 apparently healthy controls.

Results: Identified risk factors included history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, previous DVT, recent surgery, recent trauma, malignancy, sepsis, and immobility. The cases had a significantly lower mean haematocrit (33±7.4% vs 38±4.6%, p<0.001). Though no differences were observed in leucocyte and platelet counts between cases and controls but stratification as leucocytosis vs leucopaenia (P=0.003) and thrombocytosis vs thrombocytopaenia (P=0.045) differed between both groups. Also, the International normalized ratio (INR) was higher in cases (1.1±0.2 vs 1.0±0.1;P=0.001), hypercoagulable state (INR<0.9) and hypocoagulable state (INR>1.2) were observed in 4.4% and 28.9% of cases respectively but not in controls (P <0.001). Also, aPTT>40 seconds was seen in 4.4% vs 4.7% of cases and controls respectively and aPTT< 30 seconds in 22% of cases but not in controls (P =0.004).

Conclusion: Hypertension and diabetes mellitus are identified risk factors not traditionally associated with DVT. These in addition to a complete blood count and coagulation tests can be useful in stratifying patients for prophylaxis in our population and other similar communities.

高血压和糖尿病与深静脉血栓栓塞有关:一项病例对照研究。
导言:确定静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的危险因素有助于决定 VTE 的血栓预防措施。一项回顾性研究显示,在我国人群中,高血压和糖尿病与 VTE 存在关联。本研究的目的是证实这些研究结果,并确定全血细胞计数和凝血试验是否也是对 VTE 患者进行分层预防的有用参数:这是一项性别和年龄匹配的前瞻性病例对照研究,研究对象为45名经多普勒确诊的深静脉血栓患者和43名表面健康的对照组患者:已确定的危险因素包括高血压、糖尿病、既往深静脉血栓、近期手术、近期创伤、恶性肿瘤、败血症和行动不便。病例的平均血细胞比容明显较低(33±7.4% vs 38±4.6%,P1.2),分别有 4.4% 和 28.9% 的病例出现这种情况,而对照组则没有(P 40 秒分别出现在 4.4% vs 4.7% 的病例和对照组中,PTT < 30 秒出现在 22% 的病例中,而对照组则没有(P =0.004):结论:高血压和糖尿病是传统上与深静脉血栓无关的风险因素。除了全血细胞计数和凝血测试外,这些因素还有助于对患者进行分层,以便在我们的人群和其他类似社区中采取预防措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信