Thomas Wooten , Kayla S. Sansevere , Sara Siqueira , Thomas McWilliams , Sidney Peach , Erika K. Hussey , Tad Brunyé , Nathan Ward
{"title":"Evaluating the efficacy of cranial electrotherapy stimulation in mitigating anxiety-induced cognitive deficits","authors":"Thomas Wooten , Kayla S. Sansevere , Sara Siqueira , Thomas McWilliams , Sidney Peach , Erika K. Hussey , Tad Brunyé , Nathan Ward","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2024.112388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) that has demonstrated potential to modulate neural activity in a manner that may be conducive to improved cognitive performance. While other forms of NIBS, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have received attention in the field as potential acute cognitive enhancers, CES remains relatively unexplored. The current study aimed to assess the efficacy of CES in improving acute cognitive performance under normal experimental conditions, as well as during sessions of induced situational anxiety (threat of shock or ToS). To study this question, participants completed a cognitive battery assessing processing speed and distinct aspects of executive functioning (working memory, inhibition, and task switching) in two separate sessions in which they received active and sham CES. Participants were randomly assigned to between subject groups of either situational anxiety (ToS) or control condition (no ToS). We predicted that active CES would improve performance on assessments of executive functioning (working memory, inhibition, and task switching) relative to sham CES under ToS. We did not find any significant effects of ToS, CES, or an interaction between ToS and CES for any measures of executive functioning or processing speed. These findings suggest that a single dose of CES does not enhance executive functioning or processing speed under normal conditions or during ToS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54945,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 112388"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876024000928","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) that has demonstrated potential to modulate neural activity in a manner that may be conducive to improved cognitive performance. While other forms of NIBS, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have received attention in the field as potential acute cognitive enhancers, CES remains relatively unexplored. The current study aimed to assess the efficacy of CES in improving acute cognitive performance under normal experimental conditions, as well as during sessions of induced situational anxiety (threat of shock or ToS). To study this question, participants completed a cognitive battery assessing processing speed and distinct aspects of executive functioning (working memory, inhibition, and task switching) in two separate sessions in which they received active and sham CES. Participants were randomly assigned to between subject groups of either situational anxiety (ToS) or control condition (no ToS). We predicted that active CES would improve performance on assessments of executive functioning (working memory, inhibition, and task switching) relative to sham CES under ToS. We did not find any significant effects of ToS, CES, or an interaction between ToS and CES for any measures of executive functioning or processing speed. These findings suggest that a single dose of CES does not enhance executive functioning or processing speed under normal conditions or during ToS.
颅内电疗刺激(CES)是一种非侵入性脑部刺激(NIBS),已被证实具有调节神经活动的潜力,可能有助于提高认知能力。虽然经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)等其他形式的非侵入性脑刺激作为潜在的急性认知增强剂已受到该领域的关注,但 CES 仍相对缺乏研究。本研究旨在评估 CES 在正常实验条件下以及在诱发情景焦虑(休克威胁或 ToS)过程中改善急性认知能力的功效。为了研究这个问题,受试者在接受主动和非主动 CES 治疗的两个独立疗程中分别完成了认知测试,评估处理速度和执行功能的不同方面(工作记忆、抑制和任务转换)。参与者被随机分配到情境焦虑(ToS)或对照条件(无 ToS)两组。我们预测,在 ToS 条件下,相对于假 CES,主动 CES 将改善执行功能(工作记忆、抑制和任务转换)评估的表现。我们没有发现 ToS、CES 或 ToS 与 CES 之间的交互作用对任何执行功能或处理速度的评估有明显影响。这些研究结果表明,在正常情况下或在 ToS 期间,单剂量的 CES 不会增强执行功能或处理速度。
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Psychophysiology is the official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, and provides a respected forum for the publication of high quality original contributions on all aspects of psychophysiology. The journal is interdisciplinary and aims to integrate the neurosciences and behavioral sciences. Empirical, theoretical, and review articles are encouraged in the following areas:
• Cerebral psychophysiology: including functional brain mapping and neuroimaging with Event-Related Potentials (ERPs), Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Electroencephalographic studies.
• Autonomic functions: including bilateral electrodermal activity, pupillometry and blood volume changes.
• Cardiovascular Psychophysiology:including studies of blood pressure, cardiac functioning and respiration.
• Somatic psychophysiology: including muscle activity, eye movements and eye blinks.