Impact of intermittent versus continuous infusions on central line-associated bloodstream infection risk in haemato-oncology patients: a quasi-experimental study

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
{"title":"Impact of intermittent versus continuous infusions on central line-associated bloodstream infection risk in haemato-oncology patients: a quasi-experimental study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.05.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Continuous fluid infusions delivered between therapies by piggy-back systems avoid disconnection and reconnection of central venous catheters (CVCs), thereby reducing opportunities for line contamination. However, the impact of continuous versus intermittent infusions on central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) is unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To investigate the effect of temporary infusion interruption and line disconnection, with or without use of a 70% isopropyl alcohol cap (IPA-C) on CLABSI rates in haematology patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Quasi-experimental study in two haemato-oncology units. At baseline (P1, September 2020 to August 2021), continuous intravenous piggy-back infusions were mandatory. In a first intervention phase (P2, September 2021 to August 2022), infusion disconnections were implemented with use of a 70% isopropyl alcohol cap (IPA-C) for passive decontamination. In a second intervention phase (P3, September 2022 to August 2023), infusion disconnections continued without the use of IPA-C. Rates of CLABSI were compared across the three intervention periods using segmented Poisson regression.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>A total of 11,039 catheter-days across 764 CVCs and 16,226 patient-days were included. Twenty-one CLABSIs were recorded across all intervention periods. Compared with P1, incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for CLABSI did not significantly change in P2 (IRR 0.76 (95% CI 0.27–2.15)) and P3 (IRR 0.79 (95% CI 0.28–2.22)). No CVCs were removed due to occlusion during the study period. Five of 21 CLABSIs were polymicrobial, and coagulase-negative staphylococci were isolated in 19/21 cases (90%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Interruption of continuous infusions in haemato-oncology patients with a CVC was not associated with a substantial change in CLABSI rates, whether or not an IPA-C was used.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670124002202/pdfft?md5=23b40269954ee21f12ab1554801543a7&pid=1-s2.0-S0195670124002202-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670124002202","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Continuous fluid infusions delivered between therapies by piggy-back systems avoid disconnection and reconnection of central venous catheters (CVCs), thereby reducing opportunities for line contamination. However, the impact of continuous versus intermittent infusions on central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) is unknown.

Aim

To investigate the effect of temporary infusion interruption and line disconnection, with or without use of a 70% isopropyl alcohol cap (IPA-C) on CLABSI rates in haematology patients.

Methods

Quasi-experimental study in two haemato-oncology units. At baseline (P1, September 2020 to August 2021), continuous intravenous piggy-back infusions were mandatory. In a first intervention phase (P2, September 2021 to August 2022), infusion disconnections were implemented with use of a 70% isopropyl alcohol cap (IPA-C) for passive decontamination. In a second intervention phase (P3, September 2022 to August 2023), infusion disconnections continued without the use of IPA-C. Rates of CLABSI were compared across the three intervention periods using segmented Poisson regression.

Findings

A total of 11,039 catheter-days across 764 CVCs and 16,226 patient-days were included. Twenty-one CLABSIs were recorded across all intervention periods. Compared with P1, incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for CLABSI did not significantly change in P2 (IRR 0.76 (95% CI 0.27–2.15)) and P3 (IRR 0.79 (95% CI 0.28–2.22)). No CVCs were removed due to occlusion during the study period. Five of 21 CLABSIs were polymicrobial, and coagulase-negative staphylococci were isolated in 19/21 cases (90%).

Conclusion

Interruption of continuous infusions in haemato-oncology patients with a CVC was not associated with a substantial change in CLABSI rates, whether or not an IPA-C was used.

间歇输液与持续输液对血液肿瘤患者中心静脉相关血流感染风险的影响:一项准实验研究。
背景:通过背负式系统在治疗间隙连续输液可避免中心静脉导管(CVC)的断开和重新连接,从而减少管路污染的机会。目的:研究临时输液中断和管路断开、使用或不使用 70% 异丙醇帽(IPA-C)对血液科患者 CLABSI 感染率的影响:在两个血液肿瘤科进行准实验研究。在基线阶段(P1,2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 8 月),必须进行连续静脉背负式输液。在第一干预阶段(P2,2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 8 月),使用 70% 异丙醇帽 (IPA-C) 进行被动净化,断开输液。在第二个干预阶段(P3,2022 年 9 月至 2023 年 8 月),继续断开输液,但不使用 IPA-C。采用分段泊松回归法比较了三个干预期的 CLABSI 感染率:共纳入 764 个 CVC 的 11,039 个导管日和 16,226 个患者日。所有干预期间共记录到 21 例 CLABSI。与P1相比,CLABSI的发生率比(IRR)在P2(IRR 0.76 [95% CI 0.27-2.15])和P3(IRR 0.79 [CI 95% 0.28-2.22])没有显著变化。在研究期间,没有 CVC 因闭塞而被移除。21 例 CLABSI 中有 5 例为多菌感染,19/21 例(90%)分离出凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌:结论:无论是否使用IPA-C,血液肿瘤科患者中断持续输液与CLABSI发生率的大幅变化无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hospital Infection
Journal of Hospital Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
271
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience. The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that: provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings; provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination; provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises; describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection; throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship; describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control; improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change; improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信