Worldwide differences in surgeon intraoperative practices for cochlear implantation.

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1080/14670100.2024.2367309
Nicole T Jiam, Archana Podury, Alicia M Quesnel, Ophir Handzel
{"title":"Worldwide differences in surgeon intraoperative practices for cochlear implantation.","authors":"Nicole T Jiam, Archana Podury, Alicia M Quesnel, Ophir Handzel","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2024.2367309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize practice patterns of intraoperative imaging and/or functional confirmation of cochlear implant electrode location worldwide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of otolaryngologists performing cochlear implantation was conducted between March 1 and May 6, 2023. Participants were recruited worldwide using an international otologic society membership email list and at professional meetings. Ninety-seven of the 125 invited participants (78%) completed the survey. Participants were categorized by continent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>North American surgeons use intraoperative X-rays more frequently than surgeons in Europe and Asia (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Otolaryngologists in Europe and Asia more frequently use no intraoperative imaging (<i>p</i> = 0.02). There is no regional difference between the intraoperative use of electrophysiologic instruments. European and Asian surgeons implant MED-EL devices (<i>p</i> = 0.012) more frequently than North American surgeons, who more frequently use Cochlear Corporation devices (<i>p</i> = 0.003). MED-EL use is related to less frequent intraoperative X-ray use (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Advanced Bionics use is related to more frequent intraoperative CT use (<i>p</i> = 0.03). No significant association existed between years of practice, number of cochlear implantation surgeries performed yearly, volume of pediatric CI practice, and use of intraoperative tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intraoperative practice for radiologic and functional verification of cochlear implant electrode positioning varies worldwide. Practice guidelines may help establish a standard of care for cochlear implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"344-351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2024.2367309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To characterize practice patterns of intraoperative imaging and/or functional confirmation of cochlear implant electrode location worldwide.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey of otolaryngologists performing cochlear implantation was conducted between March 1 and May 6, 2023. Participants were recruited worldwide using an international otologic society membership email list and at professional meetings. Ninety-seven of the 125 invited participants (78%) completed the survey. Participants were categorized by continent.

Results: North American surgeons use intraoperative X-rays more frequently than surgeons in Europe and Asia (p < 0.001). Otolaryngologists in Europe and Asia more frequently use no intraoperative imaging (p = 0.02). There is no regional difference between the intraoperative use of electrophysiologic instruments. European and Asian surgeons implant MED-EL devices (p = 0.012) more frequently than North American surgeons, who more frequently use Cochlear Corporation devices (p = 0.003). MED-EL use is related to less frequent intraoperative X-ray use (p = 0.02). Advanced Bionics use is related to more frequent intraoperative CT use (p = 0.03). No significant association existed between years of practice, number of cochlear implantation surgeries performed yearly, volume of pediatric CI practice, and use of intraoperative tools.

Conclusion: Intraoperative practice for radiologic and functional verification of cochlear implant electrode positioning varies worldwide. Practice guidelines may help establish a standard of care for cochlear implantation.

人工耳蜗植入手术中外科医生术中操作的全球差异。
目的描述全球人工耳蜗电极位置术中成像和/或功能确认的实践模式:方法:在 2023 年 3 月 1 日至 5 月 6 日期间,对耳鼻喉科医生进行了一次人工耳蜗植入术横断面调查。参与者是通过国际耳科协会会员电子邮件列表和专业会议在全球范围内招募的。125 名受邀参与者中有 97 人(78%)完成了调查。参与者按洲分类:结果:北美的外科医生比欧洲和亚洲的外科医生更经常使用术中 X 光(P = 0.02)。术中使用电生理仪器的情况没有地区差异。欧洲和亚洲的外科医生比北美的外科医生更频繁地植入 MED-EL 设备(p = 0.012),而北美的外科医生更频繁地使用科利耳公司的设备(p = 0.003)。MED-EL 的使用与术中较少使用 X 光有关(p = 0.02)。使用 Advanced Bionics 与术中更频繁使用 CT 有关(p = 0.03)。执业年限、每年进行的人工耳蜗植入手术数量、儿科 CI 业务量和术中工具的使用之间不存在明显关联:结论:全球范围内人工耳蜗电极定位的放射和功能验证的术中实践各不相同。实践指南有助于建立人工耳蜗植入的护理标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Cochlear Implants International was founded as an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal in response to the growing number of publications in the field of cochlear implants. It was designed to meet a need to include scientific contributions from all the disciplines that are represented in cochlear implant teams: audiology, medicine and surgery, speech therapy and speech pathology, psychology, hearing therapy, radiology, pathology, engineering and acoustics, teaching, and communication. The aim was to found a truly interdisciplinary journal, representing the full breadth of the field of cochlear implantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信