Weaker number sense accounts for impaired numerosity perception in dyscalculia: Behavioral and computational evidence

IF 3.1 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Serena Dolfi, Gisella Decarli, Maristella Lunardon, Michele De Filippo De Grazia, Silvia Gerola, Silvia Lanfranchi, Giuseppe Cossu, Francesco Sella, Alberto Testolin, Marco Zorzi
{"title":"Weaker number sense accounts for impaired numerosity perception in dyscalculia: Behavioral and computational evidence","authors":"Serena Dolfi,&nbsp;Gisella Decarli,&nbsp;Maristella Lunardon,&nbsp;Michele De Filippo De Grazia,&nbsp;Silvia Gerola,&nbsp;Silvia Lanfranchi,&nbsp;Giuseppe Cossu,&nbsp;Francesco Sella,&nbsp;Alberto Testolin,&nbsp;Marco Zorzi","doi":"10.1111/desc.13538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Impaired numerosity perception in developmental dyscalculia (low “number acuity”) has been interpreted as evidence of reduced representational precision in the neurocognitive system supporting non-symbolic number sense. However, recent studies suggest that poor numerosity judgments might stem from stronger interference from non-numerical visual information, in line with alternative accounts that highlight impairments in executive functions and visuospatial abilities in the etiology of dyscalculia. To resolve this debate, we used a psychophysical method designed to disentangle the contribution of numerical and non-numerical features to explicit numerosity judgments in a dot comparison task and we assessed the relative saliency of numerosity in a spontaneous categorization task. Children with dyscalculia were compared to control children with average mathematical skills matched for age, IQ, and visuospatial memory. In the comparison task, the lower accuracy of dyscalculics compared to controls was linked to weaker encoding of numerosity, but not to the strength of non-numerical biases. Similarly, in the spontaneous categorization task, children with dyscalculia showed a weaker number-based categorization compared to the control group, with no evidence of a stronger influence of non-numerical information on category choice. Simulations with a neurocomputational model of numerosity perception showed that the reduction of representational resources affected the progressive refinement of number acuity, with little effect on non-numerical bias in numerosity judgments. Together, these results suggest that impaired numerosity perception in dyscalculia cannot be explained by increased interference from non-numerical visual cues, thereby supporting the hypothesis of a core number sense deficit.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>A strongly debated issue is whether impaired numerosity perception in dyscalculia stems from a deficit in number sense or from poor executive and visuospatial functions.</li>\n \n <li>Dyscalculic children show reduced precision in visual numerosity judgments and weaker number-based spontaneous categorization, but no increasing reliance on continuous visual properties.</li>\n \n <li>Simulations with deep neural networks demonstrate that reduced neural/computational resources affect the developmental trajectory of number acuity and account for impaired numerosity judgments.</li>\n \n <li>Our findings show that weaker number acuity in developmental dyscalculia is not necessarily related to increased interference from non-numerical visual cues.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/desc.13538","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.13538","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Impaired numerosity perception in developmental dyscalculia (low “number acuity”) has been interpreted as evidence of reduced representational precision in the neurocognitive system supporting non-symbolic number sense. However, recent studies suggest that poor numerosity judgments might stem from stronger interference from non-numerical visual information, in line with alternative accounts that highlight impairments in executive functions and visuospatial abilities in the etiology of dyscalculia. To resolve this debate, we used a psychophysical method designed to disentangle the contribution of numerical and non-numerical features to explicit numerosity judgments in a dot comparison task and we assessed the relative saliency of numerosity in a spontaneous categorization task. Children with dyscalculia were compared to control children with average mathematical skills matched for age, IQ, and visuospatial memory. In the comparison task, the lower accuracy of dyscalculics compared to controls was linked to weaker encoding of numerosity, but not to the strength of non-numerical biases. Similarly, in the spontaneous categorization task, children with dyscalculia showed a weaker number-based categorization compared to the control group, with no evidence of a stronger influence of non-numerical information on category choice. Simulations with a neurocomputational model of numerosity perception showed that the reduction of representational resources affected the progressive refinement of number acuity, with little effect on non-numerical bias in numerosity judgments. Together, these results suggest that impaired numerosity perception in dyscalculia cannot be explained by increased interference from non-numerical visual cues, thereby supporting the hypothesis of a core number sense deficit.

Research Highlights

  • A strongly debated issue is whether impaired numerosity perception in dyscalculia stems from a deficit in number sense or from poor executive and visuospatial functions.
  • Dyscalculic children show reduced precision in visual numerosity judgments and weaker number-based spontaneous categorization, but no increasing reliance on continuous visual properties.
  • Simulations with deep neural networks demonstrate that reduced neural/computational resources affect the developmental trajectory of number acuity and account for impaired numerosity judgments.
  • Our findings show that weaker number acuity in developmental dyscalculia is not necessarily related to increased interference from non-numerical visual cues.

Abstract Image

计算障碍中数字感知受损的原因:行为和计算证据。
发育性计算障碍中的数字感知能力受损("数字敏锐度 "低)一直被解释为支持非符号数字感的神经认知系统表征精确度降低的证据。然而,最近的研究表明,数字判断能力差可能源于非数字视觉信息的干扰较强,这与强调执行功能和视觉空间能力受损是计算障碍病因的另一种说法一致。为了解决这一争论,我们采用了一种心理物理方法,旨在区分数字特征和非数字特征在点比较任务中对显性数值判断的贡献,我们还评估了自发分类任务中数值的相对显著性。我们将患有计算障碍的儿童与年龄、智商和视觉空间记忆相匹配、数学能力一般的对照组儿童进行了比较。在比较任务中,与对照组相比,计算障碍儿童的准确率较低与数字编码能力较弱有关,但与非数字偏差的强度无关。同样,在自发分类任务中,与对照组相比,计算障碍儿童的数字分类能力较弱,但没有证据表明非数字信息对类别选择的影响更大。数字感知神经计算模型的模拟结果表明,表征资源的减少影响了数字敏锐度的逐步提高,但对数字判断中的非数字偏差影响甚微。总之,这些结果表明,无法用非数字视觉线索的干扰增加来解释计算障碍中的数字感知受损,从而支持了核心数字感缺失的假设。研究亮点:一个备受争议的问题是,计算障碍中的数字感知能力受损究竟是源于数感缺陷,还是源于执行和视觉空间功能低下。计算障碍儿童在视觉数字判断方面表现出精确度降低,基于数字的自发分类能力减弱,但对连续视觉特性的依赖程度并未增加。利用深度神经网络进行的模拟证明,神经/计算资源的减少会影响数字敏锐度的发展轨迹,并导致数字判断能力受损。我们的研究结果表明,发育性计算障碍中较弱的数字敏锐度并不一定与非数字视觉线索的干扰增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: Developmental Science publishes cutting-edge theory and up-to-the-minute research on scientific developmental psychology from leading thinkers in the field. It is currently the only journal that specifically focuses on human developmental cognitive neuroscience. Coverage includes: - Clinical, computational and comparative approaches to development - Key advances in cognitive and social development - Developmental cognitive neuroscience - Functional neuroimaging of the developing brain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信