Ecological momentary assessments of cognitive dysfunction and passive suicidal ideation among college students

IF 4.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Abby Adler Mandel , Olga Revzina , Sarah Hunt , Megan L. Rogers
{"title":"Ecological momentary assessments of cognitive dysfunction and passive suicidal ideation among college students","authors":"Abby Adler Mandel ,&nbsp;Olga Revzina ,&nbsp;Sarah Hunt ,&nbsp;Megan L. Rogers","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2024.104602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cognitive dysfunction (CD), inclusive of specific cognitive content (e.g., hopelessness, unbearability) or impaired cognitive processes (e.g., attentional fixation on suicide, rumination), is a key risk factor for suicidal ideation (SI). This study aimed to evaluate multiple forms of CD using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to determine the unique contributions of CD to concurrent and prospective SI. Fifty-five college students with a history of SI or non-suicidal self-injury completed EMA surveys measuring momentary CD and passive SI (“Wish to Die” [WTD], “Wish to Stay Alive” [WTL]) four times a day for 14 days (2149 total observations). Passive SI and CD variables showed notable within-person variability. Multiple CD variables were significant predictors of concurrent ideation when examined simultaneously in multilevel models with random intercepts and fixed slopes, and associations were stronger when participants were around others. Controlling for concurrent passive SI, between-person rumination was a significant predictor of prospective WTD, and both within-person unbearability and between-person hopelessness were each predictive of prospective WTL. These findings provide evidence for the roles of specific types of CD in conferring risk for passive SI and highlight potentially malleable factors that can be changed through targeted interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 104602"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796724001293","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive dysfunction (CD), inclusive of specific cognitive content (e.g., hopelessness, unbearability) or impaired cognitive processes (e.g., attentional fixation on suicide, rumination), is a key risk factor for suicidal ideation (SI). This study aimed to evaluate multiple forms of CD using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to determine the unique contributions of CD to concurrent and prospective SI. Fifty-five college students with a history of SI or non-suicidal self-injury completed EMA surveys measuring momentary CD and passive SI (“Wish to Die” [WTD], “Wish to Stay Alive” [WTL]) four times a day for 14 days (2149 total observations). Passive SI and CD variables showed notable within-person variability. Multiple CD variables were significant predictors of concurrent ideation when examined simultaneously in multilevel models with random intercepts and fixed slopes, and associations were stronger when participants were around others. Controlling for concurrent passive SI, between-person rumination was a significant predictor of prospective WTD, and both within-person unbearability and between-person hopelessness were each predictive of prospective WTL. These findings provide evidence for the roles of specific types of CD in conferring risk for passive SI and highlight potentially malleable factors that can be changed through targeted interventions.

大学生认知功能障碍和被动自杀意念的生态瞬间评估。
认知功能障碍(CD),包括特定的认知内容(如绝望、无法忍受)或受损的认知过程(如对自杀的注意力固着、反刍),是自杀意念(SI)的关键风险因素。本研究旨在使用生态瞬间评估(EMA)对多种形式的 CD 进行评估,以确定 CD 对并发和预期 SI 的独特作用。55 名有自杀意念或非自杀性自伤史的大学生完成了 EMA 调查,测量了瞬间自杀意念和被动自杀意念("想死"[WTD] 和 "想活"[WTL]),每天四次,持续 14 天(共 2149 次观察)。被动 SI 和 CD 变量显示出显著的人际变异性。在具有随机截距和固定斜率的多层次模型中同时考察多个 CD 变量时,它们对并发意念具有显著的预测作用,而且当参与者周围有其他人时,它们之间的关联性更强。在控制并发被动 SI 的情况下,人与人之间的反刍对预期 WTD 有显著的预测作用,人内的难以忍受和人与人之间的绝望对预期 WTL 都有预测作用。这些发现为特定类型的 CD 在导致被动 SI 风险方面的作用提供了证据,并强调了可通过有针对性的干预措施加以改变的潜在可塑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Behaviour Research and Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信