Impact of left ventricular assist devices on 30-day readmission and outcomes in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a nationwide analysis.

IF 1.7 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-18 DOI:10.5114/pg.2023.134394
Umer Farooq, Zahid Ijaz Tarar, Adnan Malik, Muhammad Kashif Amin, Mustafa Gandhi, Moosa Tarar, Faisal Kamal
{"title":"Impact of left ventricular assist devices on 30-day readmission and outcomes in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a nationwide analysis.","authors":"Umer Farooq, Zahid Ijaz Tarar, Adnan Malik, Muhammad Kashif Amin, Mustafa Gandhi, Moosa Tarar, Faisal Kamal","doi":"10.5114/pg.2023.134394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bleeding, especially non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB), remains the most common cause of readmission in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients. Any readmission after NVUGIB carries a worse prognosis.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare readmission outcomes in NVUGIB patients with and without LVAD.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We identified adult NVUGIB patients using the National Readmission Database 2018 employing International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. The patients were grouped based on LVAD history. Proportions were compared using the Fisher exact test, and multivariate Cox proportional regression analysis was used to compute adjusted <i>p</i>-values. We used Stata version 14.2 to perform analyses considering 2-sided <i>p</i> < 0.05 as statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 322,342 NVUGIB patients, 1403 had a history of LVAD (mean age 64.25 years). The 30-day all-cause readmission rate in NVUGIB with LVAD was higher (24.31% vs. 13.92%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Gastrointestinal bleeding as a readmission cause was more prevalent in the LVAD group. In patients with LVAD, NVUGIB readmissions required more complex endoscopic procedures, either requiring intervention during endoscopy or enteroscopy. There was no difference in mortality in NVUGIB readmissions (1.51% vs. 4.49%, <i>p</i> = 0.36); however, the length and cost of stay were higher in the LVAD group. Additionally, we identified novel independent predictors of readmission from NVUGIB in patients with LVADs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Readmissions in NVUGIB patients after LVAD require complex haemostatic intervention and are associated with greater resource utilization. To reduce readmissions and associated healthcare costs, it is essential to identify high-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20719,"journal":{"name":"Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny","volume":"19 2","pages":"175-185"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11200072/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pg.2023.134394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bleeding, especially non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB), remains the most common cause of readmission in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients. Any readmission after NVUGIB carries a worse prognosis.

Aim: To compare readmission outcomes in NVUGIB patients with and without LVAD.

Material and methods: We identified adult NVUGIB patients using the National Readmission Database 2018 employing International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. The patients were grouped based on LVAD history. Proportions were compared using the Fisher exact test, and multivariate Cox proportional regression analysis was used to compute adjusted p-values. We used Stata version 14.2 to perform analyses considering 2-sided p < 0.05 as statistically significant.

Results: The analysis included 322,342 NVUGIB patients, 1403 had a history of LVAD (mean age 64.25 years). The 30-day all-cause readmission rate in NVUGIB with LVAD was higher (24.31% vs. 13.92%, p < 0.001). Gastrointestinal bleeding as a readmission cause was more prevalent in the LVAD group. In patients with LVAD, NVUGIB readmissions required more complex endoscopic procedures, either requiring intervention during endoscopy or enteroscopy. There was no difference in mortality in NVUGIB readmissions (1.51% vs. 4.49%, p = 0.36); however, the length and cost of stay were higher in the LVAD group. Additionally, we identified novel independent predictors of readmission from NVUGIB in patients with LVADs.

Conclusions: Readmissions in NVUGIB patients after LVAD require complex haemostatic intervention and are associated with greater resource utilization. To reduce readmissions and associated healthcare costs, it is essential to identify high-risk patients.

左心室辅助装置对非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者 30 天再入院率和预后的影响:一项全国性分析。
导言:出血,尤其是非静脉曲张性上消化道出血(NVUGIB),仍然是左心室辅助装置(LVAD)患者再入院的最常见原因。目的:比较使用和未使用 LVAD 的 NVUGIB 患者的再入院结果:我们使用国际疾病分类第十次修订版(ICD-10)代码,通过2018年全国再入院数据库(National Readmission Database 2018)确定了成年NVUGIB患者。根据 LVAD 病史对患者进行分组。使用费舍尔精确检验比较比例,并使用多变量 Cox 比例回归分析计算调整后的 p 值。我们使用 Stata 14.2 版进行分析,将双侧 p < 0.05 视为具有统计学意义:分析对象包括 322,342 名 NVUGIB 患者,其中 1403 名患者有 LVAD 病史(平均年龄 64.25 岁)。使用 LVAD 的 NVUGIB 患者 30 天全因再入院率更高(24.31% 对 13.92%,P < 0.001)。胃肠道出血作为再入院原因在 LVAD 组中更为普遍。在使用 LVAD 的患者中,NVUGIB 再入院需要进行更复杂的内镜手术,要么需要在内镜检查期间进行干预,要么需要进行肠镜检查。NVUGIB 再入院患者的死亡率没有差异(1.51% vs. 4.49%,p = 0.36);但 LVAD 组患者的住院时间和费用更长。此外,我们还发现了LVAD患者NVUGIB再入院的新的独立预测因素:结论:LVAD术后NVUGIB患者的再入院治疗需要复杂的止血干预,并与更高的资源利用率相关。为了降低再入院率和相关医疗费用,必须识别高风险患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny
Przegla̜d Gastroenterologiczny GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology Review is a journal published each 2 months, aimed at gastroenterologists and general practitioners. Published under the patronage of Consultant in Gastroenterology and Polish Pancreatic Club.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信