Clinical machine learning predicting best stroke rehabilitation responders to exoskeletal robotic gait rehabilitation.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Seonmi Park, Jongeun Choi, Yonghoon Kim, Joshua Sung H You
{"title":"Clinical machine learning predicting best stroke rehabilitation responders to exoskeletal robotic gait rehabilitation.","authors":"Seonmi Park, Jongeun Choi, Yonghoon Kim, Joshua Sung H You","doi":"10.3233/NRE-240070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although clinical machine learning (ML) algorithms offer promising potential in forecasting optimal stroke rehabilitation outcomes, their specific capacity to ascertain favorable outcomes and identify responders to robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) in individuals with hemiparetic stroke undergoing such intervention remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to determine the best predictive model based on the international classification of functioning impairment domain features (Fugl- Meyer assessment (FMA), Modified Barthel index related-gait scale (MBI), Berg balance scale (BBS)) and reveal their responsiveness to robotic assisted gait training (RAGT) in patients with subacute stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 187 people with subacute stroke who underwent a 12-week Walkbot RAGT intervention were obtained and analyzed. Overall, 18 potential predictors encompassed demographic characteristics and the baseline score of functional and structural features. Five predictive ML models, including decision tree, random forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, light gradient boosting machine, and categorical boosting, were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial and final BBS, initial BBS, final Modified Ashworth scale, and initial MBI scores were important features, predicting functional improvements. eXtreme Gradient Boosting demonstrated superior performance compared to other models in predicting functional recovery after RAGT in patients with subacute stroke.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>eXtreme Gradient Boosting may be an invaluable prognostic tool, providing clinicians and caregivers with a robust framework to make precise clinical decisions regarding the identification of optimal responders and effectively pinpoint those who are most likely to derive maximum benefits from RAGT interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"54 4","pages":"619-628"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-240070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although clinical machine learning (ML) algorithms offer promising potential in forecasting optimal stroke rehabilitation outcomes, their specific capacity to ascertain favorable outcomes and identify responders to robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) in individuals with hemiparetic stroke undergoing such intervention remains unexplored.

Objective: We aimed to determine the best predictive model based on the international classification of functioning impairment domain features (Fugl- Meyer assessment (FMA), Modified Barthel index related-gait scale (MBI), Berg balance scale (BBS)) and reveal their responsiveness to robotic assisted gait training (RAGT) in patients with subacute stroke.

Methods: Data from 187 people with subacute stroke who underwent a 12-week Walkbot RAGT intervention were obtained and analyzed. Overall, 18 potential predictors encompassed demographic characteristics and the baseline score of functional and structural features. Five predictive ML models, including decision tree, random forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, light gradient boosting machine, and categorical boosting, were used.

Results: The initial and final BBS, initial BBS, final Modified Ashworth scale, and initial MBI scores were important features, predicting functional improvements. eXtreme Gradient Boosting demonstrated superior performance compared to other models in predicting functional recovery after RAGT in patients with subacute stroke.

Conclusion: eXtreme Gradient Boosting may be an invaluable prognostic tool, providing clinicians and caregivers with a robust framework to make precise clinical decisions regarding the identification of optimal responders and effectively pinpoint those who are most likely to derive maximum benefits from RAGT interventions.

临床机器学习预测外骨骼机器人步态康复的最佳中风康复响应者。
背景:尽管临床机器学习(ML)算法在预测最佳卒中康复结果方面具有广阔的前景,但它们在确定接受机器人辅助步态训练(RAGT)的偏瘫卒中患者的有利结果和识别响应者方面的具体能力仍有待探索:我们旨在根据国际功能障碍领域特征分类(Fugl- Meyer 评估 (FMA)、改良巴特尔指数相关步态量表 (MBI)、Berg 平衡量表 (BBS))确定最佳预测模型,并揭示亚急性卒中患者对机器人辅助步态训练 (RAGT) 的反应性:获得并分析了 187 名亚急性中风患者的数据,这些患者接受了为期 12 周的 Walkbot RAGT 干预。总体而言,18 个潜在的预测因素包括人口统计学特征以及功能和结构特征的基线得分。使用了五种预测性 ML 模型,包括决策树、随机森林、极梯度提升、轻梯度提升机和分类提升:eXtreme Gradient Boosting 在预测亚急性卒中患者 RAGT 后的功能恢复方面表现优于其他模型。结论:eXtreme 梯度提升可能是一种非常有价值的预后工具,它为临床医生和护理人员提供了一个强大的框架,使他们能就最佳反应者的识别做出精确的临床决策,并有效地确定那些最有可能从 RAGT 干预中获得最大益处的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NeuroRehabilitation
NeuroRehabilitation CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NeuroRehabilitation, an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, publishes manuscripts focused on scientifically based, practical information relevant to all aspects of neurologic rehabilitation. We publish unsolicited papers detailing original work/research that covers the full life span and range of neurological disabilities including stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular disease and other neurological disorders. We also publish thematically organized issues that focus on specific clinical disorders, types of therapy and age groups. Proposals for thematic issues and suggestions for issue editors are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信