End-Stage Kidney Disease After Partial and Radical Nephrectomy Among Patients With Severe Chronic Kidney Disease.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000004124
Abhinav Khanna, Harrison C Gottlich, Maddy Dorr, Christine M Lohse, Andrew Zganjar, Vidit Sharma, Daniel Joyce, Aaron Potretzke, Cameron Britton, Andrew D Rule, Stephen A Boorjian, Bradley C Leibovich, R Houston Thompson
{"title":"End-Stage Kidney Disease After Partial and Radical Nephrectomy Among Patients With Severe Chronic Kidney Disease.","authors":"Abhinav Khanna, Harrison C Gottlich, Maddy Dorr, Christine M Lohse, Andrew Zganjar, Vidit Sharma, Daniel Joyce, Aaron Potretzke, Cameron Britton, Andrew D Rule, Stephen A Boorjian, Bradley C Leibovich, R Houston Thompson","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>AUA guidelines prioritize nephron sparing in patients with preexisting chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, few studies analyze long-term renal function in patients with preoperative severe CKD who undergo extirpative renal surgery. Herein, we compare the hazard of progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) following partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) among patients with preoperative severe CKD.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with stage 4 CKD who underwent PN or RN from 1970 to 2018 were identified. A multivariable Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model was employed to assess associations with progression to ESKD accounting for the competing risk of death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 186 patients with stage 4 CKD underwent PN (<i>n</i> = 71; 38%) or RN (<i>n</i> = 115; 62%) for renal neoplasms with median follow-up of 6.9 years (interquartile range 3.8-14.1). On multivariable analyses adjusting for competing risk of death, the subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) for older age at surgery (SHR for 5-year increase 0.81; 95% CI 0.73-0.91; <i>P</i> < .001) and higher preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (SHR for 5-unit increase 0.63; 95% CI 0.47-0.84; <i>P</i> = .002) was associated with lower hazard of progression to ESKD. There was no significant difference in hazard of ESKD between PN and RN (SHR 0.82; 95% CI 0.50-1.33; <i>P</i> = .4).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with preoperative severe CKD, higher preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate was associated with lower hazard of progression to ESKD after extirpative surgery for renal neoplasms. We did not observe a significant difference in overall hazard for developing ESKD between PN and RN.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: AUA guidelines prioritize nephron sparing in patients with preexisting chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, few studies analyze long-term renal function in patients with preoperative severe CKD who undergo extirpative renal surgery. Herein, we compare the hazard of progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) following partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) among patients with preoperative severe CKD.

Materials and methods: Patients with stage 4 CKD who underwent PN or RN from 1970 to 2018 were identified. A multivariable Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model was employed to assess associations with progression to ESKD accounting for the competing risk of death.

Results: A total of 186 patients with stage 4 CKD underwent PN (n = 71; 38%) or RN (n = 115; 62%) for renal neoplasms with median follow-up of 6.9 years (interquartile range 3.8-14.1). On multivariable analyses adjusting for competing risk of death, the subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) for older age at surgery (SHR for 5-year increase 0.81; 95% CI 0.73-0.91; P < .001) and higher preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (SHR for 5-unit increase 0.63; 95% CI 0.47-0.84; P = .002) was associated with lower hazard of progression to ESKD. There was no significant difference in hazard of ESKD between PN and RN (SHR 0.82; 95% CI 0.50-1.33; P = .4).

Conclusions: Among patients with preoperative severe CKD, higher preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate was associated with lower hazard of progression to ESKD after extirpative surgery for renal neoplasms. We did not observe a significant difference in overall hazard for developing ESKD between PN and RN.

严重慢性肾脏病患者部分和根治性肾切除术后的终末期肾病。
目的:美国肾脏病学会(AUA)指南优先考虑对已有慢性肾脏病(CKD)的患者进行肾脏切除手术。然而,很少有研究对接受肾切除手术的术前重度 CKD 患者的长期肾功能进行分析。在此,我们比较了术前患有严重 CKD 的患者在接受肾部分切除术(PN)和根治性肾切除术(RN)后进展为终末期肾病(ESKD)的危险性:对1970年至2018年期间接受肾部分切除术(PN)或根治性肾切除术(RN)的4期CKD患者进行鉴定。采用多变量Fine-Gray子分布危险模型评估与进展为ESKD的关联,并考虑死亡竞争风险:共有186名CKD 4期患者因肾脏肿瘤接受了PN(n = 71;38%)或RN(n = 115;62%)治疗,中位随访时间为6.9年(IQR 3.8-14.1)。在调整死亡竞争风险的多变量分析中,手术时年龄较大(5 年增加的子分布危险比为 0.81;95% CI 为 0.73-0.91;P < .001)和术前 eGFR 较高(5 个单位增加的子分布危险比为 0.63;95% CI 为 0.47-0.84;P = .002)与进展为 ESKD 的较低危险相关。PN和RN的ESKD风险无明显差异(SHR为0.82;95% CI为0.50-1.33;P = .4):结论:在术前患有严重 CKD 的患者中,术前 eGFR 越高,肾肿瘤根治术后进展为 ESKD 的风险越低。我们没有观察到 PN 和 RN 在发展为 ESKD 的总体风险方面存在明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Urology
Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
7.60%
发文量
3746
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the American Urological Association (AUA), and the most widely read and highly cited journal in the field, The Journal of Urology® brings solid coverage of the clinically relevant content needed to stay at the forefront of the dynamic field of urology. This premier journal presents investigative studies on critical areas of research and practice, survey articles providing short condensations of the best and most important urology literature worldwide, and practice-oriented reports on significant clinical observations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信