Prophylactic Venous Supercharging in Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Surgery: A Retrospective Dual-Center Study.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Giuseppe A G Lombardo, Mario Cherubino, Paolo Marchica, Hillary Violini, Domenico Marrella, Francesco Ciancio, Isidoro Musmarra, Rosario Ranno, Dario Melita
{"title":"Prophylactic Venous Supercharging in Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Surgery: A Retrospective Dual-Center Study.","authors":"Giuseppe A G Lombardo, Mario Cherubino, Paolo Marchica, Hillary Violini, Domenico Marrella, Francesco Ciancio, Isidoro Musmarra, Rosario Ranno, Dario Melita","doi":"10.1055/a-2355-3875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is nowadays considered the gold standard in breast reconstruction. However, venous congestion is still a leading cause of free flap failure. Despite the conspicuous articles regarding the use of a secondary venous anastomosis, there is a lack in the literature regarding the prophylactic use of a secondary venous route to reduce the incidence of complications during breast reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A double-center retrospective study based on women undergoing DIEP breast reconstruction was conducted, dividing patients into case group (DIEP flaps with double venous anastomosis) and control group (DIEP flaps with single venous anastomosis). Demographic and surgical data and complications were compared and statistically analyzed, and a reconstructive algorithm was proposed to improve the flap insetting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> In total, 154 patients were included in the study, divided into case group (74 patients) and control group (80 patients). The median age at the time of surgery was 49.09 years (range: 29-68 years), slightly lower in group 1 when compared with group 2. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.52 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (range: 21.09-29.37 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), in particular 25.47 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (range: 23.44-28.63 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) in group 1 and 25.58 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (range: 21.09-29.37 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) in group 2. No statistical differences were found between groups in terms of BMI and smoking and comorbidities history. The average operative times were 272.16 minutes (range: 221-328 minutes) in group 1 and 272.34 minutes (range: 221-327 minutes) in group 2, with no significant difference between groups, as well as ischemia time (44.4 minutes in group 1 [range: 38-56 minutes] and 49.12 minutes in group 2 [range: 41-67 minutes]). Statistical analysis showed a reduction in short-term complications and a statistically significant reduction for take-backs in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> Our study suggests that venous supercharging of DIEP flap by performing dual venous anastomosis can be routinely and safely done prophylactically, and thus not only after intraoperative assessment of venous congestion, to avoid flap venous congestion and decrease the rates of re-exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2355-3875","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is nowadays considered the gold standard in breast reconstruction. However, venous congestion is still a leading cause of free flap failure. Despite the conspicuous articles regarding the use of a secondary venous anastomosis, there is a lack in the literature regarding the prophylactic use of a secondary venous route to reduce the incidence of complications during breast reconstruction.

Methods:  A double-center retrospective study based on women undergoing DIEP breast reconstruction was conducted, dividing patients into case group (DIEP flaps with double venous anastomosis) and control group (DIEP flaps with single venous anastomosis). Demographic and surgical data and complications were compared and statistically analyzed, and a reconstructive algorithm was proposed to improve the flap insetting.

Results:  In total, 154 patients were included in the study, divided into case group (74 patients) and control group (80 patients). The median age at the time of surgery was 49.09 years (range: 29-68 years), slightly lower in group 1 when compared with group 2. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.52 kg/m2 (range: 21.09-29.37 kg/m2), in particular 25.47 kg/m2 (range: 23.44-28.63 kg/m2) in group 1 and 25.58 kg/m2 (range: 21.09-29.37 kg/m2) in group 2. No statistical differences were found between groups in terms of BMI and smoking and comorbidities history. The average operative times were 272.16 minutes (range: 221-328 minutes) in group 1 and 272.34 minutes (range: 221-327 minutes) in group 2, with no significant difference between groups, as well as ischemia time (44.4 minutes in group 1 [range: 38-56 minutes] and 49.12 minutes in group 2 [range: 41-67 minutes]). Statistical analysis showed a reduction in short-term complications and a statistically significant reduction for take-backs in the two groups.

Conclusions:  Our study suggests that venous supercharging of DIEP flap by performing dual venous anastomosis can be routinely and safely done prophylactically, and thus not only after intraoperative assessment of venous congestion, to avoid flap venous congestion and decrease the rates of re-exploration.

DIEP 皮瓣手术中的预防性静脉充盈:一项回顾性双中心研究
背景:如今,DIEP 皮瓣被认为是乳房重建的金标准。然而,静脉充血仍是游离皮瓣失败的主要原因。尽管关于使用辅助静脉吻合术的文章屡见不鲜,但关于预防性使用辅助静脉途径以降低乳房重建过程中并发症发生率的文献却十分缺乏:方法:对接受DIEP乳房再造术的女性进行了一项双中心回顾性研究,将患者分为病例组(双静脉吻合的DIEP皮瓣)和对照组(单静脉吻合的DIEP皮瓣)。对两组患者的人口统计学、手术数据和并发症进行了比较和统计分析,并提出了改进皮瓣嵌入的重建算法:研究共纳入 154 例患者,分为病例组(74 例)和对照组(80 例)。手术时的中位年龄为 49.09 岁(29-68 岁不等),第一组略低于第二组。平均体重指数为 25.52 kg/m2(范围为 21.09-29.37 ),其中第一组为 25.47 kg/m2(范围为 23.44-28.63 ),第二组为 25.58 kg/m2(范围为 21.09-29.37 )。各组之间在体重指数、吸烟史和合并症方面没有统计学差异。第一组的平均手术时间为272.16分钟(范围221-328),第二组为272.34分钟(范围221-327),组间无显著差异;缺血时间第一组为44.4分钟(范围38-56),第二组为49.12分钟(范围41-67)。统计分析表明,两组相比,短期并发症减少,回输次数明显减少:我们的研究表明,通过双静脉吻合术对 DIEP 皮瓣进行静脉充盈可以常规、安全地进行预防性治疗,而不是仅在术中评估静脉充血后才进行,以避免皮瓣静脉充血和再次切除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信