{"title":"Identification of sepsis-causing bacteria from whole blood without culture using primers with no cross-reactivity to human DNA","authors":"Yasuyuki Kawai , Akifumi Nakayama , Hidetada Fukushima","doi":"10.1016/j.mimet.2024.106982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sepsis is a major health concern globally, and identification of the causative organism usually takes several days. Furthermore, molecular amplification using whole blood from patients with sepsis remains challenging because of primer cross-reactivity with human DNA, which can delay appropriate clinical intervention. To address these concerns, we designed primers that could reduce cross-reactivity. By evaluating these primers against human DNA, we confirmed that the cross-reactivity observed with conventional primers was notably absent. In silico PCR further demonstrated the specificity and efficiency of the designed primers across 23 bacterial species that are often associated with sepsis. When tested using blood samples from sepsis patients, the designed primers showed moderate sensitivity and high specificity. Surprisingly, our method identified bacteria even in samples that were detected at other sites but tested negative using conventional blood culture methods. Although we identified some challenges, such as contamination with <em>Acetobacter aceti</em> due to the saponin pretreatment of samples, the developed method demonstrates remarkable potential for rapid identification of the causative organisms of sepsis and provides a new avenue for diagnosis in clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of microbiological methods","volume":"223 ","pages":"Article 106982"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167701224000940/pdfft?md5=068ae949409e9f6af94c40e37db689c3&pid=1-s2.0-S0167701224000940-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of microbiological methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167701224000940","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sepsis is a major health concern globally, and identification of the causative organism usually takes several days. Furthermore, molecular amplification using whole blood from patients with sepsis remains challenging because of primer cross-reactivity with human DNA, which can delay appropriate clinical intervention. To address these concerns, we designed primers that could reduce cross-reactivity. By evaluating these primers against human DNA, we confirmed that the cross-reactivity observed with conventional primers was notably absent. In silico PCR further demonstrated the specificity and efficiency of the designed primers across 23 bacterial species that are often associated with sepsis. When tested using blood samples from sepsis patients, the designed primers showed moderate sensitivity and high specificity. Surprisingly, our method identified bacteria even in samples that were detected at other sites but tested negative using conventional blood culture methods. Although we identified some challenges, such as contamination with Acetobacter aceti due to the saponin pretreatment of samples, the developed method demonstrates remarkable potential for rapid identification of the causative organisms of sepsis and provides a new avenue for diagnosis in clinical practice.
败血症是全球关注的主要健康问题,而致病菌的鉴定通常需要数天时间。此外,使用败血症患者的全血进行分子扩增仍具有挑战性,因为引物与人类 DNA 存在交叉反应,这会延误适当的临床干预。为了解决这些问题,我们设计了可以减少交叉反应的引物。通过评估这些引物与人类 DNA 的反应,我们证实传统引物明显不存在交叉反应。硅 PCR 进一步证明了所设计引物对 23 种经常与败血症相关的细菌的特异性和效率。使用败血症患者的血液样本进行测试时,设计的引物显示出中等灵敏度和高特异性。令人惊讶的是,即使在其他部位检测到的细菌样本中,我们的方法也能识别出细菌,但传统的血液培养方法检测结果却是阴性。虽然我们发现了一些挑战,如样本皂素预处理导致的醋酸纤维菌污染,但所开发的方法在快速鉴定败血症致病菌方面具有显著的潜力,为临床实践提供了一条新的诊断途径。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Microbiological Methods publishes scholarly and original articles, notes and review articles. These articles must include novel and/or state-of-the-art methods, or significant improvements to existing methods. Novel and innovative applications of current methods that are validated and useful will also be published. JMM strives for scholarship, innovation and excellence. This demands scientific rigour, the best available methods and technologies, correctly replicated experiments/tests, the inclusion of proper controls, calibrations, and the correct statistical analysis. The presentation of the data must support the interpretation of the method/approach.
All aspects of microbiology are covered, except virology. These include agricultural microbiology, applied and environmental microbiology, bioassays, bioinformatics, biotechnology, biochemical microbiology, clinical microbiology, diagnostics, food monitoring and quality control microbiology, microbial genetics and genomics, geomicrobiology, microbiome methods regardless of habitat, high through-put sequencing methods and analysis, microbial pathogenesis and host responses, metabolomics, metagenomics, metaproteomics, microbial ecology and diversity, microbial physiology, microbial ultra-structure, microscopic and imaging methods, molecular microbiology, mycology, novel mathematical microbiology and modelling, parasitology, plant-microbe interactions, protein markers/profiles, proteomics, pyrosequencing, public health microbiology, radioisotopes applied to microbiology, robotics applied to microbiological methods,rumen microbiology, microbiological methods for space missions and extreme environments, sampling methods and samplers, soil and sediment microbiology, transcriptomics, veterinary microbiology, sero-diagnostics and typing/identification.