Systematic review of MRI safety literature in relation to radiofrequency thermal injury prevention

IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Cassandra Baker BAppSc(MedRadTech), MSc MRI, Barbara Nugent BSc (Hons), PgC (MRI), DCR(R), MRSO (MRSC™), MIPEM, David Grainger MSc MIPEM, Johnathan Hewis MSc Med Imag, PgCert LTHE, PgCert BE, BSc Hons DiRad, FHEA, Christina Malamateniou PhD, MA Clin. Education BSc (Hons) SFHEA DIC MAcaMEd
{"title":"Systematic review of MRI safety literature in relation to radiofrequency thermal injury prevention","authors":"Cassandra Baker BAppSc(MedRadTech), MSc MRI,&nbsp;Barbara Nugent BSc (Hons), PgC (MRI), DCR(R), MRSO (MRSC™), MIPEM,&nbsp;David Grainger MSc MIPEM,&nbsp;Johnathan Hewis MSc Med Imag, PgCert LTHE, PgCert BE, BSc Hons DiRad, FHEA,&nbsp;Christina Malamateniou PhD, MA Clin. Education BSc (Hons) SFHEA DIC MAcaMEd","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a rapidly evolving modality, generally considered safe due to lack of ionising radiation. While MRI technology and techniques are improving, many of the safety concerns remain the same as when first established. Patient thermal injuries are the most frequently reported adverse event, accounting for 59% of MRI incidents to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Surveys indicate many incidents remain unreported. Patient thermal injuries are preventable and various methods for their mitigation have been published. However, recommendations can be variable, fragmented and confusing.</p>\n \n <p>The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise the evidence on MRI safety and associated skin injuries and offer comprehensive recommendations for radiographers to prevent skin thermal injuries.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Four journal databases were searched for sources published January 2010–May 2023, presenting information on MRI safety and thermal injuries.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <div>Of 26,801 articles returned, after careful screening and based on the eligibility criteria, only 79 articles and an additional 19 grey literature sources were included (<i>n</i> = 98). Included studies were examined using thematic analysis to determine if holistic recommendations can be provided to assist in preventing skin burns. This resulted in three simplified recommendations:\n\n <ul>\n \n <li>Remove any electrically conductive items</li>\n \n <li>Insulate the patient to prevent any conductive loops or contact with objects</li>\n \n <li>Communicate regularly</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>By implementing the above recommendations, it is estimated that 97% of skin burns could be prevented. With thermal injuries continuing to impact MRI safety, strategies to prevent skin burns and heating are essential. Assessing individual risks, rather than blanket policies, will help prevent skin thermal injuries occurring, improving patient care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":"71 3","pages":"445-460"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmrs.800","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmrs.800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a rapidly evolving modality, generally considered safe due to lack of ionising radiation. While MRI technology and techniques are improving, many of the safety concerns remain the same as when first established. Patient thermal injuries are the most frequently reported adverse event, accounting for 59% of MRI incidents to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Surveys indicate many incidents remain unreported. Patient thermal injuries are preventable and various methods for their mitigation have been published. However, recommendations can be variable, fragmented and confusing.

The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise the evidence on MRI safety and associated skin injuries and offer comprehensive recommendations for radiographers to prevent skin thermal injuries.

Methods

Four journal databases were searched for sources published January 2010–May 2023, presenting information on MRI safety and thermal injuries.

Results

Of 26,801 articles returned, after careful screening and based on the eligibility criteria, only 79 articles and an additional 19 grey literature sources were included (n = 98). Included studies were examined using thematic analysis to determine if holistic recommendations can be provided to assist in preventing skin burns. This resulted in three simplified recommendations:
  • Remove any electrically conductive items
  • Insulate the patient to prevent any conductive loops or contact with objects
  • Communicate regularly

Conclusion

By implementing the above recommendations, it is estimated that 97% of skin burns could be prevented. With thermal injuries continuing to impact MRI safety, strategies to prevent skin burns and heating are essential. Assessing individual risks, rather than blanket policies, will help prevent skin thermal injuries occurring, improving patient care.

Abstract Image

与射频热损伤预防相关的磁共振成像安全文献的系统性回顾。
简介磁共振成像(MRI)是一种快速发展的成像方式,由于不含电离辐射,通常被认为是安全的。虽然核磁共振成像技术和工艺在不断改进,但许多安全问题仍与最初建立时一样。患者热损伤是最常报告的不良事件,占食品药品管理局(FDA)收到的 MRI 事件的 59%。调查显示,许多事件仍未报告。患者热损伤是可以预防的,目前已公布了各种缓解方法。然而,这些建议可能各不相同、支离破碎且令人困惑。本系统性综述旨在综合核磁共振成像安全和相关皮肤损伤的证据,为放射技师提供预防皮肤热损伤的全面建议:方法:在四个期刊数据库中搜索了 2010 年 1 月至 2023 年 5 月间发表的有关核磁共振成像安全性和热损伤的资料:在检索到的 26,801 篇文章中,经过仔细筛选并根据资格标准,只纳入了 79 篇文章和另外 19 篇灰色文献资料(n = 98)。采用主题分析法对所纳入的研究进行了审查,以确定是否可以提供有助于预防皮肤烧伤的整体建议。最终提出了三项简化建议:移除任何导电物品 隔离患者,防止任何导电回路或与物体接触 定期沟通 结论:通过实施上述建议,估计可以预防 97% 的皮肤烧伤。由于热损伤持续影响核磁共振成像的安全性,预防皮肤烧伤和加热的策略至关重要。评估个体风险而非一刀切的政策将有助于防止皮肤热损伤的发生,从而改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
69
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (JMRS) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal that accepts manuscripts related to medical imaging / diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, medical ultrasound / sonography, and the complementary disciplines of medical physics, radiology, radiation oncology, nursing, psychology and sociology. Manuscripts may take the form of: original articles, review articles, commentary articles, technical evaluations, case series and case studies. JMRS promotes excellence in international medical radiation science by the publication of contemporary and advanced research that encourages the adoption of the best clinical, scientific and educational practices in international communities. JMRS is the official professional journal of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology (NZIMRT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信