Reduction of metal artefacts from bilateral hip prostheses during lower extremity computed tomography angiography: an experimental phantom study

IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Omarah N. Abdalqader MSc, Mohammad Hjouj PhD, Mohammad Aljamal PhD, Fawaz Hjouj PhD, Mohamed Abuzaid PhD, Mahmoud Mousa MSc
{"title":"Reduction of metal artefacts from bilateral hip prostheses during lower extremity computed tomography angiography: an experimental phantom study","authors":"Omarah N. Abdalqader MSc,&nbsp;Mohammad Hjouj PhD,&nbsp;Mohammad Aljamal PhD,&nbsp;Fawaz Hjouj PhD,&nbsp;Mohamed Abuzaid PhD,&nbsp;Mahmoud Mousa MSc","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Image quality reduction due to metallic artefacts is a significant challenge during vascular computed tomography (CT) imaging of the lower extremities in patients with hip prostheses. This study aims to analyse various reconstruction algorithms' ability to reduce metal artefacts due to two types of hip prostheses during lower extremity CT angiography examinations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A pelvis phantom was fabricated with the insertion of a tube filled with contrast media to simulate the femoral artery, and the phantom was then CT scanned with and without hip prostheses. Multimodal images were acquired using different kilovoltage peak (kVp) settings and reconstructed with different algorithms, such as filtered back projection (FBP), iterative reconstruction (iDose<sup>4</sup>), iterative model-based reconstruction (IMR) and orthopaedic metal artefact reduction (O-MAR). Image quality was assessed based on image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and Hounsfield unit (HU) deviation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The IMR approach significantly improved image quality compared to iDose<sup>4</sup> and FBP. For the vascular region, O-MAR improves SNR by 5 ± 1, 23 ± 5 and 42 ± 9 for FBP, iDose<sup>4</sup> and IMR respectively, and improves HU precision towards the baseline values by 49% and 83% for FBP and IMR, respectively. The noise reduction was 71% and 89% for FBP and IMR, and 57% for iDose<sup>4</sup>. O-MAR greatly enhances SNR corrections among the most severe artefacts, with 29 ± 1 and 43 ± 4 for FBP and IMR, compared to iDose<sup>4</sup> by 37 ± 7.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>IMR combined with O-MAR could improve the CT angiography of the lower extremities of patients with a hip prosthesis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":"71 3","pages":"421-431"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmrs.797","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmrs.797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Image quality reduction due to metallic artefacts is a significant challenge during vascular computed tomography (CT) imaging of the lower extremities in patients with hip prostheses. This study aims to analyse various reconstruction algorithms' ability to reduce metal artefacts due to two types of hip prostheses during lower extremity CT angiography examinations.

Methods

A pelvis phantom was fabricated with the insertion of a tube filled with contrast media to simulate the femoral artery, and the phantom was then CT scanned with and without hip prostheses. Multimodal images were acquired using different kilovoltage peak (kVp) settings and reconstructed with different algorithms, such as filtered back projection (FBP), iterative reconstruction (iDose4), iterative model-based reconstruction (IMR) and orthopaedic metal artefact reduction (O-MAR). Image quality was assessed based on image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and Hounsfield unit (HU) deviation.

Results

The IMR approach significantly improved image quality compared to iDose4 and FBP. For the vascular region, O-MAR improves SNR by 5 ± 1, 23 ± 5 and 42 ± 9 for FBP, iDose4 and IMR respectively, and improves HU precision towards the baseline values by 49% and 83% for FBP and IMR, respectively. The noise reduction was 71% and 89% for FBP and IMR, and 57% for iDose4. O-MAR greatly enhances SNR corrections among the most severe artefacts, with 29 ± 1 and 43 ± 4 for FBP and IMR, compared to iDose4 by 37 ± 7.

Conclusion

IMR combined with O-MAR could improve the CT angiography of the lower extremities of patients with a hip prosthesis.

Abstract Image

减少双侧髋关节假体在下肢计算机断层扫描血管造影过程中产生的金属伪影:实验模型研究。
简介:金属伪影导致的图像质量下降是髋关节假体患者下肢血管计算机断层扫描(CT)成像过程中面临的一大挑战。本研究旨在分析各种重建算法在下肢 CT 血管造影检查中减少两种髋关节假体造成的金属伪影的能力:方法:制作一个骨盆模型,插入一根充满造影剂的管子来模拟股动脉,然后对装有和未装髋关节假体的模型进行 CT 扫描。使用不同的千伏峰值(kVp)设置采集多模态图像,并使用不同的算法进行重建,如滤波背投影(FBP)、迭代重建(iDose4)、基于模型的迭代重建(IMR)和矫形外科金属伪影消除(O-MAR)。图像质量根据图像噪声、信噪比(SNR)和Hounsfield单位(HU)偏差进行评估:结果:与 iDose4 和 FBP 相比,IMR 方法明显提高了图像质量。就血管区域而言,O-MAR 对 FBP、iDose4 和 IMR 的信噪比分别提高了 5±1、23±5 和 42±9,对 FBP 和 IMR 的 HU 精确度分别提高了基线值的 49% 和 83%。FBP 和 IMR 的降噪率分别为 71% 和 89%,iDose4 为 57%。在最严重的伪影中,O-MAR 大大提高了信噪比校正,FBP 和 IMR 分别为 29 ± 1 和 43 ± 4,而 iDose4 为 37 ± 7:结论:IMR 结合 O-MAR 可以改善髋关节假体患者下肢的 CT 血管造影。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
69
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (JMRS) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal that accepts manuscripts related to medical imaging / diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, medical ultrasound / sonography, and the complementary disciplines of medical physics, radiology, radiation oncology, nursing, psychology and sociology. Manuscripts may take the form of: original articles, review articles, commentary articles, technical evaluations, case series and case studies. JMRS promotes excellence in international medical radiation science by the publication of contemporary and advanced research that encourages the adoption of the best clinical, scientific and educational practices in international communities. JMRS is the official professional journal of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology (NZIMRT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信