Fractional CO2 Laser for Burn Scars: A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Those With and Without Laser Treatment.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Cailin Abouzeid, Jonathan Friedstat, Richard Goldstein, Kaitlyn L Chacon, Anupama Mehta, Robert L Sheridan, John T Schulz, Lewis Kazis, Jeremy Goverman, Colleen M Ryan, Jeffrey C Schneider
{"title":"Fractional CO2 Laser for Burn Scars: A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Those With and Without Laser Treatment.","authors":"Cailin Abouzeid, Jonathan Friedstat, Richard Goldstein, Kaitlyn L Chacon, Anupama Mehta, Robert L Sheridan, John T Schulz, Lewis Kazis, Jeremy Goverman, Colleen M Ryan, Jeffrey C Schneider","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irae129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Burn reconstruction outcomes are an area of growing investigation. Although there is evidence of measured physical improvements in scar characteristics after laser treatment, there is little information on patient-reported outcomes. The purpose of this study is to compare patient-reported outcomes between burn survivors with and without laser treatment. The study included participants in the Burn Model System National Database at a single center; participants that received outpatient laser treatment for burn scars were compared to a matched group of burn survivors that did not receive laser. The following outcomes were examined: Satisfaction With Life Scale, Mental and Physical Component Summary of the Veterans Rand Survey, and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Scale. Regression analyses examined the associations between laser treatment and each outcome at 12 and 24 months. The study population included 287 adult burn survivors (65 laser group and 222 control group). The significant differences found between the 2 groups included: burn size (laser: 14.9, 13.5 SD, control: 8.9, 11.1 SD; P < .001), insurance type (P = .036), inhalation injury (laser: 17.2%, control: 2.7%; P < .001), and ventilator requirement (laser: 27.7%, control: 13.5%; P = .013). Laser treatment was not associated with any of the outcomes at both follow-up time points. Further research is needed to develop patient-reported outcome measures that are more sensitive to the clinical changes experienced by burn survivors receiving laser treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":"1505-1512"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11567781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae129","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Burn reconstruction outcomes are an area of growing investigation. Although there is evidence of measured physical improvements in scar characteristics after laser treatment, there is little information on patient-reported outcomes. The purpose of this study is to compare patient-reported outcomes between burn survivors with and without laser treatment. The study included participants in the Burn Model System National Database at a single center; participants that received outpatient laser treatment for burn scars were compared to a matched group of burn survivors that did not receive laser. The following outcomes were examined: Satisfaction With Life Scale, Mental and Physical Component Summary of the Veterans Rand Survey, and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity Scale. Regression analyses examined the associations between laser treatment and each outcome at 12 and 24 months. The study population included 287 adult burn survivors (65 laser group and 222 control group). The significant differences found between the 2 groups included: burn size (laser: 14.9, 13.5 SD, control: 8.9, 11.1 SD; P < .001), insurance type (P = .036), inhalation injury (laser: 17.2%, control: 2.7%; P < .001), and ventilator requirement (laser: 27.7%, control: 13.5%; P = .013). Laser treatment was not associated with any of the outcomes at both follow-up time points. Further research is needed to develop patient-reported outcome measures that are more sensitive to the clinical changes experienced by burn survivors receiving laser treatment.

二氧化碳点阵激光治疗烧伤疤痕:接受和未接受激光治疗的患者报告结果比较。
烧伤重建效果是一个需要不断研究的领域。虽然有证据表明激光治疗后疤痕特征得到了明显的物理改善,但有关患者报告结果的信息却很少。本研究旨在比较接受和未接受激光治疗的烧伤幸存者的患者报告结果。研究对象包括一个中心的烧伤模型系统国家数据库中的参与者;将接受门诊激光治疗烧伤疤痕的参与者与未接受激光治疗的匹配烧伤幸存者进行比较。研究结果如下生活满意度量表、退伍军人兰德调查(Veterans Rand Survey)的精神和身体部分摘要以及 PROMIS 疼痛强度量表。回归分析检验了激光治疗与 12 个月和 24 个月后各项结果之间的关联。研究对象包括 287 名成年烧伤幸存者(激光组 65 人,对照组 222 人)。两组之间的明显差异包括:烧伤面积(激光组:14.9,13.5 SD;对照组:8.9,11.1 SD;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信