The impact of individual clinical features in cold agglutinin disease: hemolytic versus non-hemolytic symptoms.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Expert Review of Hematology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1080/17474086.2024.2372333
Sigbjørn Berentsen, Josephine M I Vos, Agnieszka Malecka, Geir E Tjønnfjord, Shirley D'Sa
{"title":"The impact of individual clinical features in cold agglutinin disease: hemolytic versus non-hemolytic symptoms.","authors":"Sigbjørn Berentsen, Josephine M I Vos, Agnieszka Malecka, Geir E Tjønnfjord, Shirley D'Sa","doi":"10.1080/17474086.2024.2372333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>During the last decades, the pathogenesis of cold agglutinin disease (CAD) has been well elucidated and shown to be complex. Several documented or investigational therapies have been made available. This development has resulted in major therapeutic advances, but also in challenges in choice of therapy.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this review, we address each step in pathogenesis: bone marrow clonal lymphoproliferation, composition and effects of monoclonal cold agglutinin, non-complement mediated erythrocyte agglutination, complement-dependent hemolysis, and other effects of complement activation. We also discuss the heterogeneous clinical features and their relation to specific steps in pathogenesis, in particular with respect to the impact of complement involvement. CAD can be classified into three clinical phenotypes with consequences for established treatments as well as development of new therapies. Some promising future treatment approaches - beyond chemoimmunotherapy and complement inhibition - are reviewed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The patient's individual clinical profile regarding complement involvement and hemolytic versus non-hemolytic features is important for the choice of treatment. Further development of treatment approaches is encouraged, and some candidate drugs are promising irrespective of clinical phenotype. Patients with CAD requiring therapy should be considered for inclusion in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":12325,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"479-492"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2024.2372333","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: During the last decades, the pathogenesis of cold agglutinin disease (CAD) has been well elucidated and shown to be complex. Several documented or investigational therapies have been made available. This development has resulted in major therapeutic advances, but also in challenges in choice of therapy.

Areas covered: In this review, we address each step in pathogenesis: bone marrow clonal lymphoproliferation, composition and effects of monoclonal cold agglutinin, non-complement mediated erythrocyte agglutination, complement-dependent hemolysis, and other effects of complement activation. We also discuss the heterogeneous clinical features and their relation to specific steps in pathogenesis, in particular with respect to the impact of complement involvement. CAD can be classified into three clinical phenotypes with consequences for established treatments as well as development of new therapies. Some promising future treatment approaches - beyond chemoimmunotherapy and complement inhibition - are reviewed.

Expert opinion: The patient's individual clinical profile regarding complement involvement and hemolytic versus non-hemolytic features is important for the choice of treatment. Further development of treatment approaches is encouraged, and some candidate drugs are promising irrespective of clinical phenotype. Patients with CAD requiring therapy should be considered for inclusion in clinical trials.

冷凝集素病个体临床特征的影响:溶血症状与非溶血症状。
导言:在过去的几十年中,冷凝集素病(CAD)的发病机理已被充分阐明,并被证明是复杂的。目前已有多种有据可查或正在研究的疗法。这一发展带来了重大的治疗进步,但也给治疗方法的选择带来了挑战:在这篇综述中,我们讨论了发病机制的每一个步骤:骨髓克隆性淋巴细胞增殖、单克隆冷凝集素的组成和作用、非补体介导的红细胞凝集、补体依赖性溶血以及补体激活的其他作用。我们还讨论了不同的临床特征及其与特定发病步骤的关系,特别是补体参与的影响。CAD 可分为三种临床表型,这对已有的治疗方法和新疗法的开发都有影响。除化学免疫疗法和补体抑制外,本文还综述了一些前景看好的未来治疗方法:专家意见:患者在补体受累、溶血与非溶血特征方面的个体临床特征对于治疗方法的选择非常重要。我们鼓励进一步开发治疗方法,无论临床表型如何,一些候选药物都很有前景。应考虑将需要治疗的 CAD 患者纳入临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advanced molecular research techniques have transformed hematology in recent years. With improved understanding of hematologic diseases, we now have the opportunity to research and evaluate new biological therapies, new drugs and drug combinations, new treatment schedules and novel approaches including stem cell transplantation. We can also expect proteomics, molecular genetics and biomarker research to facilitate new diagnostic approaches and the identification of appropriate therapies. Further advances in our knowledge regarding the formation and function of blood cells and blood-forming tissues should ensue, and it will be a major challenge for hematologists to adopt these new paradigms and develop integrated strategies to define the best possible patient care. Expert Review of Hematology (1747-4086) puts these advances in context and explores how they will translate directly into clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信