Duration of triple antithrombotic therapy and clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in atrial fibrillation.

IF 1.8 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mark A Sammut, Dwayne Conway, Javaid Iqbal, Arvindra Krishnamurthy, Kenneth P Morgan, Paul D Morris, James D Richardson, Alexander M K Rothman, Julian P Gunn, Robert F Storey
{"title":"Duration of triple antithrombotic therapy and clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in atrial fibrillation.","authors":"Mark A Sammut, Dwayne Conway, Javaid Iqbal, Arvindra Krishnamurthy, Kenneth P Morgan, Paul D Morris, James D Richardson, Alexander M K Rothman, Julian P Gunn, Robert F Storey","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2024.2374366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) with aspirin, a P2Y<sub>12</sub> inhibitor, and oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) raises concerns about increased bleeding. Regimens incorporating more potent P2Y<sub>12</sub> inhibitors over clopidogrel have not been investigated adequately.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was performed on 387 patients with AF receiving TAT for 1 month (<i>n</i> = 236) or ≤1 week (<i>n</i> = 151) after PCI. Major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were assessed up to 30 days post-procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bleeding was less frequent with ≤1 week versus 1 month of TAT (3.3 vs 9.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.025) while MACCE were similar (4.6 vs 4.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.998). No differences in bleeding or MACCE were observed between ticagrelor/prasugrel and clopidogrel regimens. For patients receiving ≤1 week of TAT, no excess of MACCE was seen in the subgroup given no further aspirin post-PCI compared with those given aspirin for up to 1 week (3.6 vs 5.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TAT post-PCI for ≤1 week was associated with less bleeding despite greater use of ticagrelor/prasugrel but similar MACCE versus 1-month TAT. These findings support further studies on safety and efficacy of dual therapy with ticagrelor/prasugrel immediately after PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262428/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2024.2374366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) with aspirin, a P2Y12 inhibitor, and oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) raises concerns about increased bleeding. Regimens incorporating more potent P2Y12 inhibitors over clopidogrel have not been investigated adequately.

Research design and methods: A retrospective observational study was performed on 387 patients with AF receiving TAT for 1 month (n = 236) or ≤1 week (n = 151) after PCI. Major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were assessed up to 30 days post-procedure.

Results: Bleeding was less frequent with ≤1 week versus 1 month of TAT (3.3 vs 9.3%; p = 0.025) while MACCE were similar (4.6 vs 4.7%; p = 0.998). No differences in bleeding or MACCE were observed between ticagrelor/prasugrel and clopidogrel regimens. For patients receiving ≤1 week of TAT, no excess of MACCE was seen in the subgroup given no further aspirin post-PCI compared with those given aspirin for up to 1 week (3.6 vs 5.2%).

Conclusions: TAT post-PCI for ≤1 week was associated with less bleeding despite greater use of ticagrelor/prasugrel but similar MACCE versus 1-month TAT. These findings support further studies on safety and efficacy of dual therapy with ticagrelor/prasugrel immediately after PCI.

心房颤动经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的三联抗血栓治疗持续时间和临床疗效。
背景:接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的心房颤动(AF)患者使用阿司匹林、P2Y12 抑制剂和口服抗凝药进行三联抗血栓治疗(TAT)会引起出血增加的担忧。与氯吡格雷相比,更强效的 P2Y12 抑制剂的治疗方案尚未得到充分研究:对 387 名房颤患者进行了回顾性观察研究,这些患者在 PCI 后接受了 1 个月(236 人)或≤1 周(151 人)的 TAT 治疗。结果显示,PCI术后1个月(236人)或≤1周(151人)接受TAT治疗的房颤患者出血较少,而PCI术后≤1周接受TAT治疗的房颤患者出血较多:结果:TAT≤1周与1个月相比,出血发生率较低(3.3% vs 9.3%;p = 0.025),而MACCE相似(4.6% vs 4.7%;p = 0.998)。ticagrelor/prasugrel方案与氯吡格雷方案在出血或MACCE方面没有差异。在接受≤1周TAT治疗的患者中,PCI后不再服用阿司匹林的亚组与服用阿司匹林最多1周的亚组相比,未发现MACCE过多的情况(3.6% vs 5.2%):结论:尽管使用更多的替卡格雷/普拉格雷,但PCI后≤1周的TAT与更少的出血相关,但与1个月的TAT相比,MACCE相似。这些发现支持进一步研究PCI术后立即使用替卡格雷/普拉格雷双重疗法的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy (ISSN 1477-9072) provides expert reviews on the clinical applications of new medicines, therapeutic agents and diagnostics in cardiovascular disease. Coverage includes drug therapy, heart disease, vascular disorders, hypertension, cholesterol in cardiovascular disease, heart disease, stroke, heart failure and cardiovascular surgery. The Expert Review format is unique. Each review provides a complete overview of current thinking in a key area of research or clinical practice.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信