Client and family experiences with telehealth-delivered early psychosis services

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Ana Carolina Florence, Ana Stefančić, Adrienne Sheitman, Kaleigh Fidaleo, Iruma Bello, Lisa Dixon, Robert Eldon Drake, Ilana Nossel, Leopoldo J. Cabassa, Elaina Montague, Shannon Pagdon, Jamaitreya Lyn, Sapana R. Patel
{"title":"Client and family experiences with telehealth-delivered early psychosis services","authors":"Ana Carolina Florence,&nbsp;Ana Stefančić,&nbsp;Adrienne Sheitman,&nbsp;Kaleigh Fidaleo,&nbsp;Iruma Bello,&nbsp;Lisa Dixon,&nbsp;Robert Eldon Drake,&nbsp;Ilana Nossel,&nbsp;Leopoldo J. Cabassa,&nbsp;Elaina Montague,&nbsp;Shannon Pagdon,&nbsp;Jamaitreya Lyn,&nbsp;Sapana R. Patel","doi":"10.1111/eip.13550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The COVID-19 pandemic prompted a significant shift to delivering early psychosis services using telehealth. Little is known about the experience of using telehealth in early psychosis services. This quality improvement qualitative project investigated the experiences of program participants and family members with telehealth services in OnTrackNY, an early intervention program for psychosis in New York State during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The project team conducted individual interviews and focus groups. Data analyses used a matrix approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Nineteen OnTrackNY program participants and nine family members participated in five focus groups and nine individual interviews. Data were organized into five themes (a) accessibility: most individuals had a device and internet access and challenges were related to connectivity, such as image freezing and sound breaking; (b) convenience/flexibility: benefits included the reduced commute and costs; (c) levels of comfort/privacy with telehealth: program participants felt less judged and less anxiety leading up to in-person appointments while also expressing privacy concerns; (d) sense of connectedness: in-person social connections were deemed important and not replaceable by telehealth; and (e) suggestions: program participants expressed a preference for in-person group activities and suggested hybrid options, highlighting the importance of in-person visits to establish rapport at the beginning of treatment before transitioning to telehealth.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Telehealth services were generally well accepted. Suggestions for future service delivery include offering a combination of telehealth and in-person services based on program participants' preferences and prioritizing in-person services during the early phase of treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11385,"journal":{"name":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","volume":"18 12","pages":"1032-1039"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11625533/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eip.13550","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The COVID-19 pandemic prompted a significant shift to delivering early psychosis services using telehealth. Little is known about the experience of using telehealth in early psychosis services. This quality improvement qualitative project investigated the experiences of program participants and family members with telehealth services in OnTrackNY, an early intervention program for psychosis in New York State during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

The project team conducted individual interviews and focus groups. Data analyses used a matrix approach.

Results

Nineteen OnTrackNY program participants and nine family members participated in five focus groups and nine individual interviews. Data were organized into five themes (a) accessibility: most individuals had a device and internet access and challenges were related to connectivity, such as image freezing and sound breaking; (b) convenience/flexibility: benefits included the reduced commute and costs; (c) levels of comfort/privacy with telehealth: program participants felt less judged and less anxiety leading up to in-person appointments while also expressing privacy concerns; (d) sense of connectedness: in-person social connections were deemed important and not replaceable by telehealth; and (e) suggestions: program participants expressed a preference for in-person group activities and suggested hybrid options, highlighting the importance of in-person visits to establish rapport at the beginning of treatment before transitioning to telehealth.

Conclusions

Telehealth services were generally well accepted. Suggestions for future service delivery include offering a combination of telehealth and in-person services based on program participants' preferences and prioritizing in-person services during the early phase of treatment.

Abstract Image

客户和家庭对远程医疗提供的早期精神病服务的体验。
目的:COVID-19 大流行促使人们大力转向使用远程医疗提供早期精神病服务。人们对在早期精神病服务中使用远程医疗的体验知之甚少。本质量改进定性项目调查了 COVID-19 大流行期间纽约州精神病早期干预项目 OnTrackNY 中项目参与者和家庭成员使用远程医疗服务的经验:项目小组进行了个人访谈和焦点小组讨论。数据分析采用矩阵法:19 名 OnTrackNY 项目参与者和 9 名家庭成员参加了 5 个焦点小组和 9 次个别访谈。数据被归纳为五个主题:(a)可及性:大多数人都有设备和互联网接入,挑战与连接有关,如图像冻结和声音中断;(b)便利性/灵活性:好处包括减少了通勤时间和费用;(c)远程医疗的舒适度/私密性:计划参与者在面对面预约时感到较少的评判和较少的焦虑,同时也表达了对隐私的担忧;(d)联系感:(e) 建议:项目参与者表示更喜欢面对面的小组活动,并提出了混合选项,强调了在过渡到远程医疗之前,面对面就诊在治疗初期建立融洽关系的重要性。结论:远程保健服务普遍被接受。对未来服务提供的建议包括:根据项目参与者的偏好提供远程医疗和面对面服务的组合,以及在治疗初期优先考虑面对面服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Early Intervention in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Early Intervention in Psychiatry publishes original research articles and reviews dealing with the early recognition, diagnosis and treatment across the full range of mental and substance use disorders, as well as the underlying epidemiological, biological, psychological and social mechanisms that influence the onset and early course of these disorders. The journal provides comprehensive coverage of early intervention for the full range of psychiatric disorders and mental health problems, including schizophrenia and other psychoses, mood and anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders and personality disorders. Papers in any of the following fields are considered: diagnostic issues, psychopathology, clinical epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatments and other forms of intervention, clinical trials, health services and economic research and mental health policy. Special features are also published, including hypotheses, controversies and snapshots of innovative service models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信