Impact of Tumor Size and Differentiation Grade on Survival After Lobectomy and Segmentectomy for Patients with Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1245/s10434-024-15673-3
Yangwei Xiang, Ke Zhou, Cheng Fang, Weili Han
{"title":"Impact of Tumor Size and Differentiation Grade on Survival After Lobectomy and Segmentectomy for Patients with Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Yangwei Xiang, Ke Zhou, Cheng Fang, Weili Han","doi":"10.1245/s10434-024-15673-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of tumor size and differentiation grade on long term survival in patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) after lobectomy and segmentectomy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients with stage T1-2N0M0 LUAD who underwent lobectomy and segmentectomy were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Patients were stratified as grade I (well differentiated), grade II (moderately differentiated), and grade III/IV (poorly differentiated/undifferentiated) carcinomas. The effect of tumor size on overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) was evaluated using the multivariate Cox regression model, including the interaction between tumor size, type of surgery, and tumor differentiation grade. The inverse probability of treatment weighting method was used to adjust for bias between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19,857 patients were identified, including 18,759 (94.4%) who underwent lobectomy and 1098 (5.5%) who underwent segmentectomy. A three-way interaction among tumor size, differentiation grade, and type of surgery was observed in the overall cohort. After stratifying by differentiation grade, plots of interaction revealed that lobectomy was associated with improved survival compared with segmentectomy when the tumor size exceeded 23 mm for grade I LUAD and 14 mm for grade II LUAD. No interaction was observed between the studied factors in grade III/IV carcinomas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study interpreted the interaction between tumor size and type of surgery on long-term survival in patients with early stage LUAD and established a tumor size threshold beyond which lobectomy provided survival benefits compared with segmentectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"9289-9297"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-15673-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of tumor size and differentiation grade on long term survival in patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) after lobectomy and segmentectomy.

Patients and methods: Patients with stage T1-2N0M0 LUAD who underwent lobectomy and segmentectomy were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Patients were stratified as grade I (well differentiated), grade II (moderately differentiated), and grade III/IV (poorly differentiated/undifferentiated) carcinomas. The effect of tumor size on overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) was evaluated using the multivariate Cox regression model, including the interaction between tumor size, type of surgery, and tumor differentiation grade. The inverse probability of treatment weighting method was used to adjust for bias between the groups.

Results: A total of 19,857 patients were identified, including 18,759 (94.4%) who underwent lobectomy and 1098 (5.5%) who underwent segmentectomy. A three-way interaction among tumor size, differentiation grade, and type of surgery was observed in the overall cohort. After stratifying by differentiation grade, plots of interaction revealed that lobectomy was associated with improved survival compared with segmentectomy when the tumor size exceeded 23 mm for grade I LUAD and 14 mm for grade II LUAD. No interaction was observed between the studied factors in grade III/IV carcinomas.

Conclusions: This study interpreted the interaction between tumor size and type of surgery on long-term survival in patients with early stage LUAD and established a tumor size threshold beyond which lobectomy provided survival benefits compared with segmentectomy.

Abstract Image

肿瘤大小和分化等级对早期肺腺癌患者肺叶切除术和肺段切除术后生存期的影响
研究背景本研究旨在探讨肿瘤大小和分化等级对早期肺腺癌(LUAD)患者肺叶切除术和肺段切除术后长期生存的影响:从监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中筛选出接受肺叶切除术和肺段切除术的 T1-2N0M0 期 LUAD 患者。患者被分为I级(分化良好)、II级(中度分化)和III/IV级(分化不良/未分化)癌。采用多变量考克斯回归模型评估了肿瘤大小对总生存期(OS)和肺癌特异性生存期(LCSS)的影响,包括肿瘤大小、手术类型和肿瘤分化分级之间的交互作用。采用逆治疗概率加权法来调整组间偏差:共发现19857例患者,其中18759例(94.4%)接受了肺叶切除术,1098例(5.5%)接受了肺段切除术。在总体队列中观察到肿瘤大小、分化等级和手术类型之间存在三方交互作用。根据分化等级进行分层后,交互作用图显示,当肿瘤大小超过23毫米(I级LUAD)和14毫米(II级LUAD)时,与分段切除术相比,肺叶切除术的生存率更高。在III/IV级癌症中,未观察到研究因素之间的相互作用:本研究解释了肿瘤大小和手术类型对早期LUAD患者长期生存的交互作用,并确定了肿瘤大小的阈值,超过该阈值,肺叶切除术与分段切除术相比可提高生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信