{"title":"Spatial pattern and attribution of ecosystem drought recovery in China","authors":"Tingtao Wu , Lei Xu , Nengcheng Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Under the backdrop of global climate change, frequent drought events pose a severe and persistent threat to the normal functioning of ecosystems. Drought recovery time, the time it takes for an ecosystem to return to its pre-drought state, is a crucial metric for drought impact and ecosystem stability. However, most previous studies have focused on the drought recovery time of the region as a whole or a specific type of ecosystem. The differences in drought recovery time among different ecosystems and their driving factors are largely unknown. Therefore, this study utilizes multi-source fused Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) terrestrial water storage (TWS) data and Gross primary productivity (GPP) data to construct drought and ecosystem indicators. Subsequently, the drought recovery time under different climates and ecosystem types in China from 2002 to 2017 is analyzed. Finally, the factors influencing the differences in drought recovery time among ecosystems are discussed in detail. The results indicate that there is significant spatial heterogeneity in drought recovery time among ecosystems in China, with the forest ecosystems in the Northeast and Southwest regions having the longest recovery time. The recovery time of forest ecosystems (4.32 months) is longer than that of cropland (4.07 months) and grassland (3.79 months) ecosystems, but there are also significant differences in the recovery time for the same ecosystems under different climate types. The differences in drought recovery time among different ecosystem types are primarily influenced by temperature and precipitation during drought recovery, and the response of ecosystems to drought. These results provide scientific support for adopting differentiated management strategies for different ecosystem types to cope with future climate change.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169424009740","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Under the backdrop of global climate change, frequent drought events pose a severe and persistent threat to the normal functioning of ecosystems. Drought recovery time, the time it takes for an ecosystem to return to its pre-drought state, is a crucial metric for drought impact and ecosystem stability. However, most previous studies have focused on the drought recovery time of the region as a whole or a specific type of ecosystem. The differences in drought recovery time among different ecosystems and their driving factors are largely unknown. Therefore, this study utilizes multi-source fused Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) terrestrial water storage (TWS) data and Gross primary productivity (GPP) data to construct drought and ecosystem indicators. Subsequently, the drought recovery time under different climates and ecosystem types in China from 2002 to 2017 is analyzed. Finally, the factors influencing the differences in drought recovery time among ecosystems are discussed in detail. The results indicate that there is significant spatial heterogeneity in drought recovery time among ecosystems in China, with the forest ecosystems in the Northeast and Southwest regions having the longest recovery time. The recovery time of forest ecosystems (4.32 months) is longer than that of cropland (4.07 months) and grassland (3.79 months) ecosystems, but there are also significant differences in the recovery time for the same ecosystems under different climate types. The differences in drought recovery time among different ecosystem types are primarily influenced by temperature and precipitation during drought recovery, and the response of ecosystems to drought. These results provide scientific support for adopting differentiated management strategies for different ecosystem types to cope with future climate change.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.