New management systems for northern root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne hapla Chitwood Tylenchida: Heteroderidae) in daylily (Hemerocallis spp.) ornamental plant production fields

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Amanda Howland, Emilie Cole , Luisa Parrado, Marisol Quintanilla
{"title":"New management systems for northern root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne hapla Chitwood Tylenchida: Heteroderidae) in daylily (Hemerocallis spp.) ornamental plant production fields","authors":"Amanda Howland,&nbsp;Emilie Cole ,&nbsp;Luisa Parrado,&nbsp;Marisol Quintanilla","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2024.106820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Michigan has the third largest floriculture industry in the United States, with the production of daylily (<em>Hemerocallis</em> spp.) a top commodity. Daylily is one of the most economically important ornamental plants, yet their production is plagued by plant-parasitic nematodes, especially the northern root-knot nematode, <em>Meloidogyne hapla</em>. Seven treatments in combination with a high-carbon, cow manure compost were selected for a three-year field trial at a commercial nursery in Zeeland, MI to discern the best <em>M. hapla</em> management strategies in daylily field production for its entire production cycle. Treatments included the compost manure by itself, Indemnify as a soil drench and as a pre-plant dip both together and separately, AzaGuard, TerraClean 5.0, and an untreated control. Additionally, a similar multi-year greenhouse trial was conducted and included a new treatment: Majestene 304. Results showed that the high-carbon, cow manure compost + Indemnify as a soil drench by itself and in combination as a pre-plant dip were the most effective treatments in reducing <em>M. hapla</em> population levels; in the greenhouse experiment, Indemnify reduced population levels by 83%. Majestene 304 provided the next best control of <em>M. hapla,</em> yet it had the highest gall ratings; the compost by itself was not effective, having higher <em>M. hapla</em> populations than the control in both experiments. Lastly, both trials emphasize the importance of applying these management strategies every year for the best <em>M. hapla</em> management. These results give the ornamental plant industry new, effective management systems to control <em>M. hapla</em> in ornamental plant field production.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219424002485","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Michigan has the third largest floriculture industry in the United States, with the production of daylily (Hemerocallis spp.) a top commodity. Daylily is one of the most economically important ornamental plants, yet their production is plagued by plant-parasitic nematodes, especially the northern root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne hapla. Seven treatments in combination with a high-carbon, cow manure compost were selected for a three-year field trial at a commercial nursery in Zeeland, MI to discern the best M. hapla management strategies in daylily field production for its entire production cycle. Treatments included the compost manure by itself, Indemnify as a soil drench and as a pre-plant dip both together and separately, AzaGuard, TerraClean 5.0, and an untreated control. Additionally, a similar multi-year greenhouse trial was conducted and included a new treatment: Majestene 304. Results showed that the high-carbon, cow manure compost + Indemnify as a soil drench by itself and in combination as a pre-plant dip were the most effective treatments in reducing M. hapla population levels; in the greenhouse experiment, Indemnify reduced population levels by 83%. Majestene 304 provided the next best control of M. hapla, yet it had the highest gall ratings; the compost by itself was not effective, having higher M. hapla populations than the control in both experiments. Lastly, both trials emphasize the importance of applying these management strategies every year for the best M. hapla management. These results give the ornamental plant industry new, effective management systems to control M. hapla in ornamental plant field production.

萱草(Hemerocallis spp.
密歇根州拥有美国第三大花卉种植业,其中萱草属植物的产量居首位。萱草是最具经济价值的观赏植物之一,但其生产却受到植物寄生线虫的困扰,尤其是北方根结线虫。密歇根州泽兰市的一家商业苗圃选择了七种与高碳牛粪堆肥相结合的处理方法进行为期三年的田间试验,以确定萱草田间生产整个生产周期的最佳管理策略。处理方法包括堆肥本身、Indemnify 作为土壤淋洗剂和播种前浸泡剂、AzaGuard、TerraClean 5.0 和未处理对照。此外,还进行了一项类似的多年温室试验,其中包括一种新的处理方法:Majestene 304。结果表明,高碳牛粪堆肥 + Indemnify 作为土壤淋洗剂本身,以及作为种植前浸泡剂的组合,是降低种群数量最有效的处理方法;在温室试验中,Indemnify 降低了 83% 的种群数量。Majestene 304 的防治效果次之,但虫瘿等级最高;堆肥本身效果不佳,两次试验中的虫瘿数量都高于对照组。最后,这两项试验都强调了每年应用这些管理策略以达到最佳管理效果的重要性。这些结果为观赏植物行业在观赏植物田间生产中提供了新的、有效的防治管理系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crop Protection
Crop Protection 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
200
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics: -Abiotic damage- Agronomic control methods- Assessment of pest and disease damage- Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases- Biological control- Biorational pesticides- Control of animal pests of world crops- Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms- Control of weeds and integrated management- Economic considerations- Effects of plant growth regulators- Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use- Environmental effects of pesticides- Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control- GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications- Importance and control of postharvest crop losses- Integrated control- Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies- Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection- Pesticide application methods- Pest management- Phytobiomes for pest and disease control- Resistance management- Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信