Innovative approach for estimating evapotranspiration and gross primary productivity by integrating land data assimilation, machine learning, and multi-source observations

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Xinlei He , Shaomin Liu , Sayed M. Bateni , Tongren Xu , Changhyun Jun , Dongkyun Kim , Xin Li , Lisheng Song , Long Zhao , Ziwei Xu , Jiaxing Wei
{"title":"Innovative approach for estimating evapotranspiration and gross primary productivity by integrating land data assimilation, machine learning, and multi-source observations","authors":"Xinlei He ,&nbsp;Shaomin Liu ,&nbsp;Sayed M. Bateni ,&nbsp;Tongren Xu ,&nbsp;Changhyun Jun ,&nbsp;Dongkyun Kim ,&nbsp;Xin Li ,&nbsp;Lisheng Song ,&nbsp;Long Zhao ,&nbsp;Ziwei Xu ,&nbsp;Jiaxing Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The integration of data assimilation (DA) and machine learning (ML) methods helps to incorporate multi-source observations into physical models, enabling more accurate estimation of evapotranspiration (ET) and gross primary productivity (GPP). Therefore, in this study, the ML-based soil moisture (SM) bias-correction model and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) observation operator are incorporated into the land data assimilation system (LDAS). Thereafter, remotely sensed leaf area index (LAI), SM, land surface temperature (LST), and SIF data are assimilated to improve the performance of the Noah-MP model. The LDAS-ML framework is developed and evaluated in the Heihe River Basin of China. Analytical results suggest that the LDAS-ML system can fully exploit information from remotely sensed LAI, LST, and SIF data, along with multi-source SM observations, to enhance the accuracy of ET and GPP estimations. The root mean square errors (RMSEs) of daily ET (GPP) estimates from LDAS-ML at the Arou, Daman, and Sidaoqiao sites are 27.27 % (59.35 %), 51.71 % (56.28 %), and 61.07 % (53.73 %) lower than those of Noah-MP, respectively. Comparisons of the daily ET and GPP retrievals from the LDAS-ML method with three ET (GLEAM, ET-Monitor, and HiTLL) and GPP (GLASS, GOSIF-GPP, and VPM) products indicate that the LDAS-ML method outperforms the remote sensing products, yielding estimates with higher accuracy and lower relative uncertainty. Additionally, in arid and sparsely vegetated areas, the improvements in land surface models are more pronounced from integrating multi-source SM observations than vegetation information. This study suggests that ML methods can effectively exploit multi-source observations to improve the performance of LDAS and provide more accurate estimates of land surface variables.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"355 ","pages":"Article 110136"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016819232400251X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of data assimilation (DA) and machine learning (ML) methods helps to incorporate multi-source observations into physical models, enabling more accurate estimation of evapotranspiration (ET) and gross primary productivity (GPP). Therefore, in this study, the ML-based soil moisture (SM) bias-correction model and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) observation operator are incorporated into the land data assimilation system (LDAS). Thereafter, remotely sensed leaf area index (LAI), SM, land surface temperature (LST), and SIF data are assimilated to improve the performance of the Noah-MP model. The LDAS-ML framework is developed and evaluated in the Heihe River Basin of China. Analytical results suggest that the LDAS-ML system can fully exploit information from remotely sensed LAI, LST, and SIF data, along with multi-source SM observations, to enhance the accuracy of ET and GPP estimations. The root mean square errors (RMSEs) of daily ET (GPP) estimates from LDAS-ML at the Arou, Daman, and Sidaoqiao sites are 27.27 % (59.35 %), 51.71 % (56.28 %), and 61.07 % (53.73 %) lower than those of Noah-MP, respectively. Comparisons of the daily ET and GPP retrievals from the LDAS-ML method with three ET (GLEAM, ET-Monitor, and HiTLL) and GPP (GLASS, GOSIF-GPP, and VPM) products indicate that the LDAS-ML method outperforms the remote sensing products, yielding estimates with higher accuracy and lower relative uncertainty. Additionally, in arid and sparsely vegetated areas, the improvements in land surface models are more pronounced from integrating multi-source SM observations than vegetation information. This study suggests that ML methods can effectively exploit multi-source observations to improve the performance of LDAS and provide more accurate estimates of land surface variables.

通过整合陆地数据同化、机器学习和多源观测,估算蒸散量和总初级生产力的创新方法
数据同化(DA)和机器学习(ML)方法的集成有助于将多源观测数据纳入物理模型,从而更准确地估算蒸散(ET)和总初级生产力(GPP)。因此,本研究将基于 ML 的土壤水分(SM)偏差校正模型和太阳诱导叶绿素荧光(SIF)观测算子纳入陆地数据同化系统(LDAS)。此后,遥感叶面积指数(LAI)、SM、地表温度(LST)和 SIF 数据被同化,以提高 Noah-MP 模型的性能。在中国黑河流域开发并评估了 LDAS-ML 框架。分析结果表明,LDAS-ML 系统可以充分利用遥感 LAI、LST 和 SIF 数据以及多源 SM 观测数据的信息,提高蒸散发和 GPP 估算的精度。LDAS-ML 在阿鲁、达曼和四道桥站点的日蒸散发(GPP)估算均方根误差(RMSE)分别比 Noah-MP 低 27.27 %(59.35 %)、51.71 %(56.28 %)和 61.07 %(53.73 %)。将 LDAS-ML 方法的每日蒸散发和 GPP 检索结果与三种蒸散发(GLEAM、ET-Monitor 和 HiTLL)和 GPP(GLASS、GOSIF-GPP 和 VPM)产品进行比较后发现,LDAS-ML 方法优于遥感产品,其估算结果具有更高的精度和更低的相对不确定性。此外,在干旱和植被稀疏地区,集成多源 SM 观测数据对地表模型的改进比植被信息更明显。这项研究表明,多重模式识别方法可以有效地利用多源观测数据来提高土地退化评估系统的性能,并提供更准确的地表变量估算值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
415
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published. Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信