Life-course pathways to exceptional longevity: Evidence from the Lothian Birth Cohort of 1921

Janie Corley, Alison Pattie, G David Batty, Simon R Cox, Ian J Deary
{"title":"Life-course pathways to exceptional longevity: Evidence from the Lothian Birth Cohort of 1921","authors":"Janie Corley, Alison Pattie, G David Batty, Simon R Cox, Ian J Deary","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glae166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Longevity, a hallmark of successful ageing, is a multifactorial trait with influences from birth onwards. However, limited evidence exists on the pathways linking diverse life-course exposures to longevity, especially within a single cohort. Methods We investigated associations between life-course factors and longevity among community-dwelling adults aged 79 (N=547) from the Lothian Birth Cohort 1921 with a mortality follow-up of 24 years. Cox proportional hazards and structural equation (path) models were used to explore how factors from early-life (social class, childhood IQ, education), mid-life (social class), later-life (health, lifestyle, psychosocial well-being), as well as sex, personality and APOE e4 status, influence survival time in days. Results During follow-up (1999-2023), 538 participants (98%) died (mean age of death=89.3 years) and 9 survived (mean age=101.6 years). Factors associated with lower mortality risk in the multivariable Cox model were higher cognitive function (HR=0.72; 95% CI:0.59-0.88), better physical function (HR=0.61; 95% CI:0.44-0.85), and greater physical activity (HR=0.81; 95% CI 0.71-0.92), while history of cancer was associated with higher mortality risk (HR=1.84; 95% CI:1.22-2.77). The life-course path model identified the same direct predictors, with additional contributions from female sex and non-smoking status, to greater longevity. Early- and mid-life factors (IQ, education, social class), and emotional stability, conscientiousness, and female sex, were indirectly and positively associated with survival trajectories via multiple dimensions of adult health. Conclusions In understanding why people live to very old ages it is necessary to consider factors from throughout the life course, and to include demographic, psychosocial, and health variables.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glae166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Longevity, a hallmark of successful ageing, is a multifactorial trait with influences from birth onwards. However, limited evidence exists on the pathways linking diverse life-course exposures to longevity, especially within a single cohort. Methods We investigated associations between life-course factors and longevity among community-dwelling adults aged 79 (N=547) from the Lothian Birth Cohort 1921 with a mortality follow-up of 24 years. Cox proportional hazards and structural equation (path) models were used to explore how factors from early-life (social class, childhood IQ, education), mid-life (social class), later-life (health, lifestyle, psychosocial well-being), as well as sex, personality and APOE e4 status, influence survival time in days. Results During follow-up (1999-2023), 538 participants (98%) died (mean age of death=89.3 years) and 9 survived (mean age=101.6 years). Factors associated with lower mortality risk in the multivariable Cox model were higher cognitive function (HR=0.72; 95% CI:0.59-0.88), better physical function (HR=0.61; 95% CI:0.44-0.85), and greater physical activity (HR=0.81; 95% CI 0.71-0.92), while history of cancer was associated with higher mortality risk (HR=1.84; 95% CI:1.22-2.77). The life-course path model identified the same direct predictors, with additional contributions from female sex and non-smoking status, to greater longevity. Early- and mid-life factors (IQ, education, social class), and emotional stability, conscientiousness, and female sex, were indirectly and positively associated with survival trajectories via multiple dimensions of adult health. Conclusions In understanding why people live to very old ages it is necessary to consider factors from throughout the life course, and to include demographic, psychosocial, and health variables.
超常寿命的生命历程途径:来自 1921 年洛锡安出生队列的证据
背景长寿是成功老龄化的标志,是一种多因素特征,从出生开始就受到影响。然而,关于不同生活过程暴露与长寿之间的联系途径,尤其是在单个队列中的联系途径,现有的证据非常有限。方法 我们调查了来自 1921 年洛锡安出生队列的 79 岁社区居住成年人(N=547)的生命过程因素与长寿之间的关系,死亡率随访期为 24 年。研究采用 Cox 比例危险模型和结构方程(路径)模型来探讨早期生活(社会阶层、儿童智商、教育)、中期生活(社会阶层)、晚期生活(健康、生活方式、社会心理健康)以及性别、性格和 APOE e4 状态等因素如何影响以天为单位的存活时间。结果 在随访期间(1999-2023 年),538 名参与者(98%)死亡(平均死亡年龄=89.3 岁),9 人存活(平均年龄=101.6 岁)。在多变量考克斯模型中,与较低死亡风险相关的因素是较高的认知功能(HR=0.72;95% CI:0.59-0.88)、较好的身体功能(HR=0.61;95% CI:0.44-0.85)和较多的体力活动(HR=0.81;95% CI:0.71-0.92),而癌症病史与较高的死亡风险相关(HR=1.84;95% CI:1.22-2.77)。生命历程路径模型确定了相同的直接预测因素,女性性别和不吸烟状况也是长寿的额外因素。早期和中期生活因素(智商、教育、社会阶层)以及情绪稳定性、自觉性和女性性别通过成人健康的多个维度与生存轨迹间接正相关。结论 在理解人们为何长寿时,有必要考虑整个生命过程中的各种因素,并将人口、社会心理和健康变量包括在内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信