Improving the diagnosis of urinary tract infections by the use of enriched media and a 48-hour incubation period.

Carla Benjumea, Ferran Navarro, Carles Alonso-Tarrés
{"title":"Improving the diagnosis of urinary tract infections by the use of enriched media and a 48-hour incubation period.","authors":"Carla Benjumea, Ferran Navarro, Carles Alonso-Tarrés","doi":"10.1099/jmm.0.001846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> The absence of a gold-standard methodology for the microbiological diagnosis of urinary tract infections (UTI) has led to insufficient standardization of criteria for the interpretation of results and processing methods, particularly incubation time and culture media.<b>Hypothesis.</b> 48-hour incubation time period and use of blood agar enhances the sensitivity of microorganisms isolated significantly.<b>Aim.</b> To determine the sensitivity of blood agar and Brilliance UTI chromogenic agar, incubating for different periods (24-48 hours), for the detection of positive urine cultures.<b>Methodoloy.</b> Comparisons were made between all possible combinations of media and incubation times. As the gold-standard reference, we used the routine methodology of our laboratory, which involves prior screening with available clinical data, flow cytometry, sediment analysis and/or Gram staining. Screened samples were then cultured on blood agar and chromogenic agar and incubated for 48 hours. Also, based on the results of Gram staining, additional media were added in selected cases.<b>Results.</b> The most significant difference was found between chromogenic agar incubated for 24 hours and blood agar incubated for 48 hours, with the latter method allowing the recovery of 10.14 % more microorganisms (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Furthermore, the value of performing Gram staining to guide processing was demonstrated, as it avoided the loss of at least 5.14 % of isolates.<b>Conclusions.</b> At least in urological and nephrological patients it is essential to include enriched culture media (blood agar) or to extend the incubation times due to the improvement of the diagnostic sensitivity of urine cultures. Gram staining also can help detect the presence of fastidious microorganisms or mixed infections, indicating whether rich and/or selective media should be included to enhance the diagnostic sensitivity of cultures. If this methodology is not followed, it should be noted that besides fastidious species, fastidious strains of <i>Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aerugniosa</i> and <i>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</i> will also be missed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94093,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical microbiology","volume":"73 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11261898/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The absence of a gold-standard methodology for the microbiological diagnosis of urinary tract infections (UTI) has led to insufficient standardization of criteria for the interpretation of results and processing methods, particularly incubation time and culture media.Hypothesis. 48-hour incubation time period and use of blood agar enhances the sensitivity of microorganisms isolated significantly.Aim. To determine the sensitivity of blood agar and Brilliance UTI chromogenic agar, incubating for different periods (24-48 hours), for the detection of positive urine cultures.Methodoloy. Comparisons were made between all possible combinations of media and incubation times. As the gold-standard reference, we used the routine methodology of our laboratory, which involves prior screening with available clinical data, flow cytometry, sediment analysis and/or Gram staining. Screened samples were then cultured on blood agar and chromogenic agar and incubated for 48 hours. Also, based on the results of Gram staining, additional media were added in selected cases.Results. The most significant difference was found between chromogenic agar incubated for 24 hours and blood agar incubated for 48 hours, with the latter method allowing the recovery of 10.14 % more microorganisms (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, the value of performing Gram staining to guide processing was demonstrated, as it avoided the loss of at least 5.14 % of isolates.Conclusions. At least in urological and nephrological patients it is essential to include enriched culture media (blood agar) or to extend the incubation times due to the improvement of the diagnostic sensitivity of urine cultures. Gram staining also can help detect the presence of fastidious microorganisms or mixed infections, indicating whether rich and/or selective media should be included to enhance the diagnostic sensitivity of cultures. If this methodology is not followed, it should be noted that besides fastidious species, fastidious strains of Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aerugniosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia will also be missed.

通过使用富集培养基和 48 小时潜伏期改进尿路感染的诊断。
导言。由于缺乏尿路感染(UTI)微生物诊断的金标准方法,导致结果解释和处理方法(尤其是培养时间和培养基)的标准不够统一。48小时培养时间和使用血琼脂可显著提高分离微生物的敏感性。确定不同培养时间(24-48 小时)的血琼脂和华晨UTI 显色琼脂对检测尿培养阳性菌的敏感性。对所有可能的培养基组合和培养时间进行比较。作为黄金标准参考,我们采用了本实验室的常规方法,包括事先利用现有临床数据、流式细胞术、沉淀物分析和/或革兰氏染色进行筛选。然后将筛选出的样本放在血琼脂和显色琼脂上培养 48 小时。此外,根据革兰氏染色的结果,在选定的情况下添加额外的培养基。培养 24 小时的显色琼脂和培养 48 小时的血液琼脂之间的差异最大,后者可多回收 10.14 % 的微生物(P < 0.0001)。此外,进行革兰氏染色以指导处理过程的价值也得到了证明,因为它至少避免了 5.14% 分离物的损失。至少在泌尿科和肾科患者中,由于尿培养诊断灵敏度的提高,必须加入富集培养基(血琼脂)或延长培养时间。革兰氏染色法也有助于检测快速微生物或混合感染的存在,说明是否应加入富集和/或选择性培养基以提高培养物的诊断灵敏度。需要注意的是,如果不采用这种方法,除了嗜快菌外,大肠杆菌、奇异变形杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌和嗜麦芽霉菌等嗜快菌株也会被漏检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信