Low-Field (64 mT) Portable MRI for Rapid Point-of-Care Diagnosis of Dissemination in Space in Patients Presenting with Optic Neuritis.

Timothy Reynold Lim, Suradech Suthiphosuwan, Jonathan Micieli, Reza Vosoughi, Raphael Schneider, Amy W Lin, Yingming Amy Chen, Alexandra Muccilli, James J Marriott, Daniel Selchen, Shobhit Mathur, Jiwon Oh, Aditya Bharatha
{"title":"Low-Field (64 mT) Portable MRI for Rapid Point-of-Care Diagnosis of Dissemination in Space in Patients Presenting with Optic Neuritis.","authors":"Timothy Reynold Lim, Suradech Suthiphosuwan, Jonathan Micieli, Reza Vosoughi, Raphael Schneider, Amy W Lin, Yingming Amy Chen, Alexandra Muccilli, James J Marriott, Daniel Selchen, Shobhit Mathur, Jiwon Oh, Aditya Bharatha","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Low-field 64 mT portable brain MRI has recently shown diagnostic promise for MS. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of portable MRI (pMRI) in assessing dissemination in space (DIS) in patients presenting with optic neuritis and determine whether deploying pMRI in the MS clinic can shorten the time from symptom onset to MRI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Newly diagnosed patients with optic neuritis referred to a tertiary academic MS center from July 2022 to January 2024 underwent both point-of-care pMRI and subsequent 3T conventional MRI (cMRI). Images were evaluated for periventricular (PV), juxtacortical (JC), and infratentorial (IT) lesions. DIS was determined on brain MRI per 2017 McDonald criteria. Test characteristics were computed by using cMRI as the reference. Interrater and intermodality agreement between pMRI and cMRI were evaluated by using the Cohen κ. Time from symptom onset to pMRI and cMRI during the study period was compared with the preceding 1.5 years before pMRI implementation by using Kruskal-Wallis with post hoc Dunn tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty patients (median age: 32.5 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 28-40]; 80% women) were included, of whom 9 (45%) and 5 (25%) had DIS on cMRI and pMRI, respectively. Median time interval between pMRI and cMRI was 7 days (IQR, 3.5-12.5). Interrater agreement was very good for PV (95%, κ = 0.89), and good for JC and IT lesions (90%, κ = 0.69 for both). Intermodality agreement was good for PV (90%, κ = 0.80) and JC (85%, κ = 0.63), and moderate for IT lesions (75%, κ = 0.42) and DIS (80%, κ = 0.58). pMRI had a sensitivity of 56% and specificity of 100% for DIS. The median time from symptom onset to pMRI was significantly shorter (8.5 days [IQR 7-12]) compared with the interval to cMRI before pMRI deployment (21 days [IQR 8-49], <i>n</i> = 50) and after pMRI deployment (15 days [IQR 12-29], <i>n</i> = 30) (both <i>P</i> < .01). Time from symptom onset to cMRI in those periods was not significantly different (<i>P </i>= .29).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with optic neuritis, pMRI exhibited moderate concordance, moderate sensitivity, and high specificity for DIS compared with cMRI. Its integration into the MS clinic reduced the time from symptom onset to MRI. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the role of pMRI in expediting early MS diagnosis and as an imaging tool in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Low-field 64 mT portable brain MRI has recently shown diagnostic promise for MS. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of portable MRI (pMRI) in assessing dissemination in space (DIS) in patients presenting with optic neuritis and determine whether deploying pMRI in the MS clinic can shorten the time from symptom onset to MRI.

Materials and methods: Newly diagnosed patients with optic neuritis referred to a tertiary academic MS center from July 2022 to January 2024 underwent both point-of-care pMRI and subsequent 3T conventional MRI (cMRI). Images were evaluated for periventricular (PV), juxtacortical (JC), and infratentorial (IT) lesions. DIS was determined on brain MRI per 2017 McDonald criteria. Test characteristics were computed by using cMRI as the reference. Interrater and intermodality agreement between pMRI and cMRI were evaluated by using the Cohen κ. Time from symptom onset to pMRI and cMRI during the study period was compared with the preceding 1.5 years before pMRI implementation by using Kruskal-Wallis with post hoc Dunn tests.

Results: Twenty patients (median age: 32.5 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 28-40]; 80% women) were included, of whom 9 (45%) and 5 (25%) had DIS on cMRI and pMRI, respectively. Median time interval between pMRI and cMRI was 7 days (IQR, 3.5-12.5). Interrater agreement was very good for PV (95%, κ = 0.89), and good for JC and IT lesions (90%, κ = 0.69 for both). Intermodality agreement was good for PV (90%, κ = 0.80) and JC (85%, κ = 0.63), and moderate for IT lesions (75%, κ = 0.42) and DIS (80%, κ = 0.58). pMRI had a sensitivity of 56% and specificity of 100% for DIS. The median time from symptom onset to pMRI was significantly shorter (8.5 days [IQR 7-12]) compared with the interval to cMRI before pMRI deployment (21 days [IQR 8-49], n = 50) and after pMRI deployment (15 days [IQR 12-29], n = 30) (both P < .01). Time from symptom onset to cMRI in those periods was not significantly different (P = .29).

Conclusions: In patients with optic neuritis, pMRI exhibited moderate concordance, moderate sensitivity, and high specificity for DIS compared with cMRI. Its integration into the MS clinic reduced the time from symptom onset to MRI. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the role of pMRI in expediting early MS diagnosis and as an imaging tool in resource-limited settings.

低磁场(64mT)便携式磁共振成像用于视神经炎患者的 DIS 快速护理点诊断。
背景和目的:低场64mT便携式脑磁共振成像(pMRI)最近显示出对多发性硬化症的诊断前景。本研究旨在评估 pMRI 在评估视神经炎患者空间播散(DIS)方面的实用性,并确定在多发性硬化症临床中部署 pMRI 是否能缩短从症状发作到 MRI 的时间:2022年7月至2024年1月转诊至一家三级多发性硬化症学术中心的新诊断视神经炎患者接受了护理点pMRI和随后的常规3T MRI(cMRI)检查。对图像进行了评估,以确定是否存在脑室周围(PV)、皮质下(JC)和脑室下(IT)病变。根据 2017 McDonald 标准在脑部 MRI 上确定 DIS。测试特征以 cMRI 为参考进行计算。使用Cohen's kappa评估pMRI和cMRI之间的互测性和模式间一致性。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Dunn's 事后检验将研究期间从症状发作到 pMRI 和 cMRI 的时间与实施 pMRI 前 1.5 年的时间进行比较:共纳入 20 名患者(中位年龄:32.5 [IQR,28-40];80% 为女性),其中 9 人(45%)和 5 人(25%)分别在 cMRI 和 pMRI 中发现了 DIS。pMRI 和 cMRI 之间的中位时间间隔为 7 天(IQR,3.5-12.5)。PV的相互间一致性非常好(95%,κ=0.89),JC和IT病变的相互间一致性也很好(90%,κ=0.69)。PV(90%,κ=0.80)和JC(85%,κ=0.63)的模态间一致性良好,IT病变(75%,κ=0.42)和DIS(80%,κ=0.58)的模态间一致性中等。从症状发作到 pMRI 的中位时间(8.5 天 [IQR:7-12])明显短于 pMRI 部署前(21 天 [IQR:8-49],n=50)和 pMRI 部署后(15 天 [IQR:12-29],n=30)到 cMRI 的时间间隔(均 pConclusions:在视神经炎患者中,与 cMRI 相比,pMRI 对 DIS 具有中等程度的一致性、中等程度的敏感性和较高的特异性。将其纳入多发性硬化症临床可缩短从症状发作到 MRI 检查的时间。缩写:pMRI = 便携式 MRI;cMRI = 传统 MRI;pwMS = 多发性硬化症患者;PV = 室周;JC = 皮层下;IT = 室下;DIS = 空间播散。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信