Accuracy of immediately placed implants using surgical guides from different 3-dimensional printers: An in vitro study

IF 3.7 2区医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1111/cid.13354

Jeremy Pitman, Jan Cosyn, Véronique Christiaens, Faris Younes, Thomas de Bruyckere, Stijn Vervaeke, Maarten Glibert

{"title":"Accuracy of immediately placed implants using surgical guides from different 3-dimensional printers: An in vitro study","authors":"Jeremy Pitman, Jan Cosyn, Véronique Christiaens, Faris Younes, Thomas de Bruyckere, Stijn Vervaeke, Maarten Glibert","doi":"10.1111/cid.13354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of 3-dimensional (3D)-printed surgical guides for fully guided immediate implants from different manufacturers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Eighteen 3D printed fully guided surgical guides (split into 3 groups [<i>n</i> = 6] according to their manufacturer: Company, Desktop, or Lab), were used to place 72 implants (<i>n</i> = 24) in identical maxillary models. After placement, the mean global, angular, mesiodistal, buccopalatal, and vertical deviation at the platform and apex of the placed implants, relative to their preoperatively planned positions, was calculated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Significant differences in global apex deviation, angular deviation, mesiodistal apex deviation, and vertical platform and apex deviation were found between the Lab and Desktop groups (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.007). Significant differences in mesiodistal platform and apex deviation and buccopalatal apex deviation were also found between the Company and Desktop groups (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.005). Finally, significant differences in buccopalatal apex deviation, and vertical platform and apex deviation were found between the Company and Lab groups (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.003). Mean differences between guide groups across all parameters never exceeded 0.5 mm or 1°.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The choice of 3D printer has a significant effect on the accuracy of fully guided immediate implants. However, the clinical relevance of these differences may be considered limited.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"26 5","pages":"922-929"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.13354","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of 3-dimensional (3D)-printed surgical guides for fully guided immediate implants from different manufacturers.

Methods

Eighteen 3D printed fully guided surgical guides (split into 3 groups [n = 6] according to their manufacturer: Company, Desktop, or Lab), were used to place 72 implants (n = 24) in identical maxillary models. After placement, the mean global, angular, mesiodistal, buccopalatal, and vertical deviation at the platform and apex of the placed implants, relative to their preoperatively planned positions, was calculated.

Results

Significant differences in global apex deviation, angular deviation, mesiodistal apex deviation, and vertical platform and apex deviation were found between the Lab and Desktop groups (p ≤ 0.007). Significant differences in mesiodistal platform and apex deviation and buccopalatal apex deviation were also found between the Company and Desktop groups (p ≤ 0.005). Finally, significant differences in buccopalatal apex deviation, and vertical platform and apex deviation were found between the Company and Lab groups (p ≤ 0.003). Mean differences between guide groups across all parameters never exceeded 0.5 mm or 1°.

Conclusions

The choice of 3D printer has a significant effect on the accuracy of fully guided immediate implants. However, the clinical relevance of these differences may be considered limited.

查看原文本刊更多论文

使用来自不同三维打印机的手术导板即时植入种植体的准确性：体外研究

目的：本研究旨在评估不同制造商生产的用于全引导即刻种植体的三维（3D）打印手术导板的准确性：方法：18 个三维打印全引导手术导板（根据其制造商分为 3 组 [n = 6]：公司、桌面或实验室）：公司、桌面或实验室），在相同的上颌模型中植入 72 个种植体（n = 24）。植入后，计算植入种植体的平台和顶点相对于术前计划位置的平均整体偏差、角度偏差、中轴偏差、颊腭偏差和垂直偏差：结果：实验室组和桌面组之间在整体顶点偏差、角度偏差、中碘顶点偏差以及垂直平台和顶点偏差方面存在显著差异（P ≤ 0.007）。公司组和桌面组之间在齿间平台和顶偏差以及颊腭顶偏差方面也存在显著差异（p ≤ 0.005）。最后，公司组和实验室组在颊腭顶偏差、垂直平台和顶偏差方面存在明显差异（p ≤ 0.003）。导板组之间所有参数的平均差异从未超过 0.5 毫米或 1°：结论：三维打印机的选择对全引导即刻种植体的准确性有显著影响。结论：三维打印机的选择对全引导即刻种植体的精确度有显著影响，但这些差异的临床意义可能有限。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

6.00

自引率

13.90%

发文量

103

审稿时长

4-8 weeks

期刊介绍： The goal of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research is to advance the scientific and technical aspects relating to dental implants and related scientific subjects. Dissemination of new and evolving information related to dental implants and the related science is the primary goal of our journal. The range of topics covered by the journals will include but be not limited to: New scientific developments relating to bone Implant surfaces and their relationship to the surrounding tissues Computer aided implant designs Computer aided prosthetic designs Immediate implant loading Immediate implant placement Materials relating to bone induction and conduction New surgical methods relating to implant placement New materials and methods relating to implant restorations Methods for determining implant stability A primary focus of the journal is publication of evidenced based articles evaluating to new dental implants, techniques and multicenter studies evaluating these treatments. In addition basic science research relating to wound healing and osseointegration will be an important focus for the journal.