2024 RECOVER Guidelines: Monitoring. Evidence and knowledge gap analysis with treatment recommendations for small animal CPR

IF 1.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Benjamin M. Brainard VMD, DACVAA, DACVECC, Selena L. Lane DVM, DACVECC, Jamie M. Burkitt-Creedon DVM, DACVECC, Manuel Boller Dr. Med. Vet.MTR, DACVECC, Daniel J. Fletcher PhD, DVM, DACVECC, Molly Crews MLS, Erik D. Fausak MSLISRVT, the RECOVER Monitoring Domain Evidence Evaluators
{"title":"2024 RECOVER Guidelines: Monitoring. Evidence and knowledge gap analysis with treatment recommendations for small animal CPR","authors":"Benjamin M. Brainard VMD, DACVAA, DACVECC,&nbsp;Selena L. Lane DVM, DACVECC,&nbsp;Jamie M. Burkitt-Creedon DVM, DACVECC,&nbsp;Manuel Boller Dr. Med. Vet.MTR, DACVECC,&nbsp;Daniel J. Fletcher PhD, DVM, DACVECC,&nbsp;Molly Crews MLS,&nbsp;Erik D. Fausak MSLISRVT,&nbsp;the RECOVER Monitoring Domain Evidence Evaluators","doi":"10.1111/vec.13390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To systematically review evidence on and devise treatment recommendations for patient monitoring before, during, and following CPR in dogs and cats, and to identify critical knowledge gaps.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Standardized, systematic evaluation of literature pertinent to peri-CPR monitoring following Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Prioritized questions were each reviewed by Evidence Evaluators, and findings were reconciled by Monitoring Domain Chairs and Reassessment Campaign on Veterinary Resuscitation (RECOVER) Co-Chairs to arrive at treatment recommendations commensurate to quality of evidence, risk:benefit relationship, and clinical feasibility. This process was implemented using an Evidence Profile Worksheet for each question that included an introduction, consensus on science, treatment recommendations, justification for these recommendations, and important knowledge gaps. A draft of these worksheets was distributed to veterinary professionals for comment for 4 weeks prior to finalization.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Transdisciplinary, international collaboration in university, specialty, and emergency practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirteen questions pertaining to hemodynamic, respiratory, and metabolic monitoring practices for identification of cardiopulmonary arrest, quality of CPR, and postcardiac arrest care were examined, and 24 treatment recommendations were formulated. Of these, 5 recommendations pertained to aspects of end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub> (ET<span>co</span><sub>2</sub>) measurement. The recommendations were founded predominantly on very low quality of evidence, with some based on expert opinion.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The Monitoring Domain authors continue to support initiation of chest compressions without pulse palpation. We recommend multimodal monitoring of patients at risk of cardiopulmonary arrest, at risk of re-arrest, or under general anesthesia. This report highlights the utility of ET<span>co</span><sub>2</sub> monitoring to verify correct intubation, identify return of spontaneous circulation, evaluate quality of CPR, and guide basic life support measures. Treatment recommendations further suggest intra-arrest evaluation of electrolytes (ie, potassium and calcium), as these may inform outcome-relevant interventions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","volume":"34 S1","pages":"76-103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/vec.13390","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/vec.13390","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To systematically review evidence on and devise treatment recommendations for patient monitoring before, during, and following CPR in dogs and cats, and to identify critical knowledge gaps.

Design

Standardized, systematic evaluation of literature pertinent to peri-CPR monitoring following Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Prioritized questions were each reviewed by Evidence Evaluators, and findings were reconciled by Monitoring Domain Chairs and Reassessment Campaign on Veterinary Resuscitation (RECOVER) Co-Chairs to arrive at treatment recommendations commensurate to quality of evidence, risk:benefit relationship, and clinical feasibility. This process was implemented using an Evidence Profile Worksheet for each question that included an introduction, consensus on science, treatment recommendations, justification for these recommendations, and important knowledge gaps. A draft of these worksheets was distributed to veterinary professionals for comment for 4 weeks prior to finalization.

Setting

Transdisciplinary, international collaboration in university, specialty, and emergency practice.

Results

Thirteen questions pertaining to hemodynamic, respiratory, and metabolic monitoring practices for identification of cardiopulmonary arrest, quality of CPR, and postcardiac arrest care were examined, and 24 treatment recommendations were formulated. Of these, 5 recommendations pertained to aspects of end-tidal CO2 (ETco2) measurement. The recommendations were founded predominantly on very low quality of evidence, with some based on expert opinion.

Conclusions

The Monitoring Domain authors continue to support initiation of chest compressions without pulse palpation. We recommend multimodal monitoring of patients at risk of cardiopulmonary arrest, at risk of re-arrest, or under general anesthesia. This report highlights the utility of ETco2 monitoring to verify correct intubation, identify return of spontaneous circulation, evaluate quality of CPR, and guide basic life support measures. Treatment recommendations further suggest intra-arrest evaluation of electrolytes (ie, potassium and calcium), as these may inform outcome-relevant interventions.

2024 RECOVER 准则:监测。小动物心肺复苏的证据和知识差距分析及治疗建议。
目的系统回顾猫狗心肺复苏术前、术中和术后患者监护的相关证据并提出治疗建议,同时找出关键的知识缺口:设计:按照建议、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)方法,对心肺复苏术前监测的相关文献进行标准化、系统化评估。优先考虑的问题分别由证据评估员进行审查,审查结果由监测领域主席和兽医复苏再评估运动(RECOVER)联合主席进行协调,以得出与证据质量、风险与收益关系以及临床可行性相称的治疗建议。在实施这一过程中,每个问题都使用了证据概况工作表,其中包括引言、科学共识、治疗建议、提出这些建议的理由以及重要的知识差距。这些工作表的草稿在定稿前分发给兽医专业人员征求意见,为期 4 周:环境:大学、专科和急救实践中的跨学科国际合作:研究了 13 个与识别心肺骤停的血液动力学、呼吸和代谢监测方法、心肺复苏术质量和心肺骤停后护理有关的问题,并制定了 24 项治疗建议。其中,5 项建议与潮气末二氧化碳 (ETco2) 测量有关。这些建议主要建立在极低质量的证据基础上,其中一些是基于专家意见:监测领域的作者继续支持在没有脉搏触诊的情况下开始胸外按压。我们建议对有心肺骤停风险、有再次骤停风险或全身麻醉的患者进行多模式监护。本报告强调了 ETco2 监测在验证插管是否正确、确定自发循环是否恢复、评估心肺复苏质量和指导基本生命支持措施方面的作用。治疗建议进一步建议在心跳停止时对电解质(即钾和钙)进行评估,因为电解质可为与结果相关的干预措施提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
121
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care’s primary aim is to advance the international clinical standard of care for emergency/critical care patients of all species. The journal’s content is relevant to specialist and non-specialist veterinarians practicing emergency/critical care medicine. The journal achieves it aims by publishing descriptions of unique presentation or management; retrospective and prospective evaluations of prognosis, novel diagnosis, or therapy; translational basic science studies with clinical relevance; in depth reviews of pertinent topics; topical news and letters; and regular themed issues. The journal is the official publication of the Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, the American College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care, the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, and the European College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. It is a bimonthly publication with international impact and adheres to currently accepted ethical standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信