2024 RECOVER Guidelines: Advanced Life Support. Evidence and knowledge gap analysis with treatment recommendations for small animal CPR

IF 1.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Jacob Wolf DVM, DACVECC, Gareth J. Buckley MA, VetMB, DACVECC, DECVECC, Elizabeth A. Rozanski DVM, DACVIM, DACVECC, Daniel J. Fletcher PhD, DVM, DACVECC, Manuel Boller Dr med vet, MTR, DACVECC, Jamie M. Burkitt-Creedon DVM, DACVECC, Kelly A. Weigand DVM, MLS, Molly Crews MLS, Erik D. Fausak MSLIS, RVT, and the RECOVER Advanced Life Support Domain Worksheet Authors
{"title":"2024 RECOVER Guidelines: Advanced Life Support. Evidence and knowledge gap analysis with treatment recommendations for small animal CPR","authors":"Jacob Wolf DVM, DACVECC,&nbsp;Gareth J. Buckley MA, VetMB, DACVECC, DECVECC,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Rozanski DVM, DACVIM, DACVECC,&nbsp;Daniel J. Fletcher PhD, DVM, DACVECC,&nbsp;Manuel Boller Dr med vet, MTR, DACVECC,&nbsp;Jamie M. Burkitt-Creedon DVM, DACVECC,&nbsp;Kelly A. Weigand DVM, MLS,&nbsp;Molly Crews MLS,&nbsp;Erik D. Fausak MSLIS, RVT,&nbsp;and the RECOVER Advanced Life Support Domain Worksheet Authors","doi":"10.1111/vec.13389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To systematically review the evidence and devise clinical recommendations on advanced life support (ALS) in dogs and cats and to identify critical knowledge gaps.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Standardized, systematic evaluation of literature pertinent to ALS following Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Prioritized questions were each reviewed by Evidence Evaluators, and findings were reconciled by ALS Domain Chairs and Reassessment Campaign on Veterinary Resuscitation (RECOVER) Co-Chairs to arrive at treatment recommendations commensurate to quality of evidence, risk:benefit relationship, and clinical feasibility. This process was implemented using an Evidence Profile Worksheet for each question that included an introduction, consensus on science, treatment recommendations, justification for these recommendations, and important knowledge gaps. A draft of these worksheets was distributed to veterinary professionals for comment for 4 weeks prior to finalization.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Transdisciplinary, international collaboration in university, specialty, and emergency practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seventeen questions pertaining to vascular access, vasopressors in shockable and nonshockable rhythms, anticholinergics, defibrillation, antiarrhythmics, and adjunct drug therapy as well as open-chest CPR were reviewed. Of the 33 treatment recommendations formulated, 6 recommendations addressed the management of patients with nonshockable arrest rhythms, 10 addressed shockable rhythms, and 6 provided guidance on open-chest CPR. We recommend against high-dose epinephrine even after prolonged CPR and suggest that atropine, when indicated, is used only once. In animals with a shockable rhythm in which initial defibrillation was unsuccessful, we recommend doubling the defibrillator dose once and suggest vasopressin (or epinephrine if vasopressin is not available), esmolol, lidocaine in dogs, and/or amiodarone in cats.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These updated RECOVER ALS guidelines clarify the approach to refractory shockable rhythms and prolonged CPR. Very low quality of evidence due to absence of clinical data in dogs and cats continues to compromise the certainty with which recommendations can be made.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","volume":"34 S1","pages":"44-75"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/vec.13389","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/vec.13389","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To systematically review the evidence and devise clinical recommendations on advanced life support (ALS) in dogs and cats and to identify critical knowledge gaps.

Design

Standardized, systematic evaluation of literature pertinent to ALS following Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Prioritized questions were each reviewed by Evidence Evaluators, and findings were reconciled by ALS Domain Chairs and Reassessment Campaign on Veterinary Resuscitation (RECOVER) Co-Chairs to arrive at treatment recommendations commensurate to quality of evidence, risk:benefit relationship, and clinical feasibility. This process was implemented using an Evidence Profile Worksheet for each question that included an introduction, consensus on science, treatment recommendations, justification for these recommendations, and important knowledge gaps. A draft of these worksheets was distributed to veterinary professionals for comment for 4 weeks prior to finalization.

Setting

Transdisciplinary, international collaboration in university, specialty, and emergency practice.

Results

Seventeen questions pertaining to vascular access, vasopressors in shockable and nonshockable rhythms, anticholinergics, defibrillation, antiarrhythmics, and adjunct drug therapy as well as open-chest CPR were reviewed. Of the 33 treatment recommendations formulated, 6 recommendations addressed the management of patients with nonshockable arrest rhythms, 10 addressed shockable rhythms, and 6 provided guidance on open-chest CPR. We recommend against high-dose epinephrine even after prolonged CPR and suggest that atropine, when indicated, is used only once. In animals with a shockable rhythm in which initial defibrillation was unsuccessful, we recommend doubling the defibrillator dose once and suggest vasopressin (or epinephrine if vasopressin is not available), esmolol, lidocaine in dogs, and/or amiodarone in cats.

Conclusions

These updated RECOVER ALS guidelines clarify the approach to refractory shockable rhythms and prolonged CPR. Very low quality of evidence due to absence of clinical data in dogs and cats continues to compromise the certainty with which recommendations can be made.

2024 年 RECOVER 指南:高级生命支持。小动物心肺复苏的证据和知识差距分析及治疗建议。
目的系统回顾证据,为犬和猫的高级生命支持(ALS)制定临床建议,并确定关键的知识缺口:设计:按照建议、评估、开发和评价分级(GRADE)方法,对有关 ALS 的文献进行标准化、系统化的评估。优先考虑的问题分别由证据评估员进行审核,审核结果由 ALS 领域主席和兽医复苏再评估运动(RECOVER)联合主席进行协调,以得出与证据质量、风险与收益关系以及临床可行性相称的治疗建议。在实施这一过程中,每个问题都使用了证据概况工作表,其中包括引言、科学共识、治疗建议、这些建议的理由以及重要的知识差距。这些工作表的草稿在定稿前分发给兽医专业人员征求意见,为期 4 周:环境:大学、专科和急救实践中的跨学科国际合作:审查了与血管通路、可电击和不可电击心律的血管加压剂、抗胆碱能药、除颤、抗心律失常药、辅助药物治疗以及开胸心肺复苏术有关的 17 个问题。在制定的 33 项治疗建议中,有 6 项建议涉及非电击性心搏停止节律患者的管理,10 项建议涉及电击性心搏停止节律,6 项建议提供了开胸心肺复苏的指导。我们建议即使在长时间心肺复苏后也不要使用大剂量肾上腺素,并建议在必要时只使用一次阿托品。对于有可电击心律但初次除颤不成功的动物,我们建议将除颤器剂量加倍一次,并建议使用血管加压素(如果没有血管加压素,则使用肾上腺素)、埃斯莫洛尔、利多卡因(犬)和/或胺碘酮(猫):这些更新的 RECOVER ALS 指南明确了处理难治性可电击心律和延长心肺复苏时间的方法。由于缺乏犬和猫的临床数据,证据质量很低,这继续影响了提出建议的确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
121
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care’s primary aim is to advance the international clinical standard of care for emergency/critical care patients of all species. The journal’s content is relevant to specialist and non-specialist veterinarians practicing emergency/critical care medicine. The journal achieves it aims by publishing descriptions of unique presentation or management; retrospective and prospective evaluations of prognosis, novel diagnosis, or therapy; translational basic science studies with clinical relevance; in depth reviews of pertinent topics; topical news and letters; and regular themed issues. The journal is the official publication of the Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, the American College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care, the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, and the European College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. It is a bimonthly publication with international impact and adheres to currently accepted ethical standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信