First psychometric evaluation of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 in adolescents.

Personality disorders Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1037/per0000674
Julianne Wu, Madeleine Allman, Kennedy Balzen, Joost Hutsebaut, Carla Sharp
{"title":"First psychometric evaluation of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 in adolescents.","authors":"Julianne Wu, Madeleine Allman, Kennedy Balzen, Joost Hutsebaut, Carla Sharp","doi":"10.1037/per0000674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reflecting the recent consensus that challenges in personality functioning often onsets in adolescence, and the move toward dimensional models of personality pathology such as the level of personality functioning (LPF) of the alternative model for personality disorders, it is important to have validated measures that can assess LPF in young people. The Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF 2.0) is the briefest measure of LPF and may be particularly well suited for assessing LPF in youth; however, it has yet to be formally validated in youth. Therefore, the current investigation evaluated the psychometric properties of the LPFS-BF 2.0 in adolescents drawn from a community sample of ethnically diverse North American youth (<i>N</i> = 194, age 12-18; 58% female). Factor structure, gender invariance, reliability, convergent validity, incremental validity, and criterion validity were evaluated. Results demonstrated support for the LPFS-BF 2.0's unidimensional factor structure, as well as high internal consistency. Configural, metric, and scalar measurement invariance was supported across male and female genders, as well as convergent validity. Relative to the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 Brief Form and Levels of Personality Functioning Questionnaire 12-18, the LPFS-BF 2.0 demonstrated additional variance in predicting borderline personality features, and internalizing and externalizing problems. Study findings support the English version of the LPFS-BF 2.0 as a brief and psychometrically sound instrument for assessing LPF in youth and adolescents. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reflecting the recent consensus that challenges in personality functioning often onsets in adolescence, and the move toward dimensional models of personality pathology such as the level of personality functioning (LPF) of the alternative model for personality disorders, it is important to have validated measures that can assess LPF in young people. The Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF 2.0) is the briefest measure of LPF and may be particularly well suited for assessing LPF in youth; however, it has yet to be formally validated in youth. Therefore, the current investigation evaluated the psychometric properties of the LPFS-BF 2.0 in adolescents drawn from a community sample of ethnically diverse North American youth (N = 194, age 12-18; 58% female). Factor structure, gender invariance, reliability, convergent validity, incremental validity, and criterion validity were evaluated. Results demonstrated support for the LPFS-BF 2.0's unidimensional factor structure, as well as high internal consistency. Configural, metric, and scalar measurement invariance was supported across male and female genders, as well as convergent validity. Relative to the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 Brief Form and Levels of Personality Functioning Questionnaire 12-18, the LPFS-BF 2.0 demonstrated additional variance in predicting borderline personality features, and internalizing and externalizing problems. Study findings support the English version of the LPFS-BF 2.0 as a brief and psychometrically sound instrument for assessing LPF in youth and adolescents. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

首次对青少年人格功能水平量表-简表 2.0 进行心理测量学评估。
最近有一种共识认为,人格功能方面的挑战往往在青春期开始显现,而且人格病理学正朝着维度模型(如人格障碍替代模型中的人格功能水平(LPF))的方向发展,因此,拥有能够评估青少年人格功能水平的有效测量方法非常重要。人格功能水平量表-简表 2.0(LPFS-BF 2.0)是最简短的人格功能水平量表,可能特别适合评估青少年的人格功能水平;然而,该量表尚未在青少年中得到正式验证。因此,本次调查评估了LPFS-BF 2.0在青少年中的心理测量特性,调查对象来自北美不同种族的青少年社区样本(N = 194,年龄12-18岁;58%为女性)。对因子结构、性别不变性、信度、聚合效度、增量效度和标准效度进行了评估。结果表明,LPFS-BF 2.0 的单维因子结构以及较高的内部一致性均得到了支持。男性和女性的配置、度量和标度测量不变性以及收敛效度均得到了支持。与DSM-5人格量表简表和12-18级人格功能问卷相比,LPFS-BF 2.0在预测边缘型人格特征、内化和外化问题方面表现出更大的差异。研究结果表明,LPFS-BF 2.0 英文版是一种简明且心理测量学上可靠的工具,可用于评估青少年的边缘型人格。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信