Sense of agency in schizophrenia: A reconciliation of conflicting findings through a theory-driven literature review

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Ileana Rossetti , Marika Mariano , Angelo Maravita , Eraldo Paulesu , Laura Zapparoli
{"title":"Sense of agency in schizophrenia: A reconciliation of conflicting findings through a theory-driven literature review","authors":"Ileana Rossetti ,&nbsp;Marika Mariano ,&nbsp;Angelo Maravita ,&nbsp;Eraldo Paulesu ,&nbsp;Laura Zapparoli","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The sense of agency is the experience of being the author of self-generated actions and their outcomes. Both clinical manifestations and experimental evidence suggest that the agency experience and the mechanisms underlying agency attribution may be dysfunctional in schizophrenia. Yet, studies investigating the sense of agency in these patients show seemingly conflicting results: some indicated under-attribution of self-agency (coherently with certain positive symptoms), while others suggested over-attribution of self-agency. In this review, we assess whether recent theoretical frameworks can reconcile these <em>divergent</em> results. We examine whether the identification of agency abnormalities in schizophrenia might depend on the measure of self-agency considered (depending on the specific task requirements) and the available agency-related cues. We conclude that all these aspects are relevant to predict and characterize the type of agency misattribution that schizophrenia patients might show. We argue that one particular model, based on the predictive coding theory, can reconcile the interpretation of the multifarious phenomenology of agency manifestations in schizophrenia, paving the way for testing agency disorders in novel ways.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763424002501/pdfft?md5=ba407ab38b24131c54286f24035b92fb&pid=1-s2.0-S0149763424002501-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763424002501","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The sense of agency is the experience of being the author of self-generated actions and their outcomes. Both clinical manifestations and experimental evidence suggest that the agency experience and the mechanisms underlying agency attribution may be dysfunctional in schizophrenia. Yet, studies investigating the sense of agency in these patients show seemingly conflicting results: some indicated under-attribution of self-agency (coherently with certain positive symptoms), while others suggested over-attribution of self-agency. In this review, we assess whether recent theoretical frameworks can reconcile these divergent results. We examine whether the identification of agency abnormalities in schizophrenia might depend on the measure of self-agency considered (depending on the specific task requirements) and the available agency-related cues. We conclude that all these aspects are relevant to predict and characterize the type of agency misattribution that schizophrenia patients might show. We argue that one particular model, based on the predictive coding theory, can reconcile the interpretation of the multifarious phenomenology of agency manifestations in schizophrenia, paving the way for testing agency disorders in novel ways.

精神分裂症患者的代入感:通过理论驱动的文献综述调和相互矛盾的研究结果。
代理感是指作为自我行为及其结果的创造者的体验。临床表现和实验证据都表明,精神分裂症患者的代理体验和代理归因机制可能出现功能障碍。然而,对这些患者的代理感进行调查的研究却显示出了看似相互矛盾的结果:一些研究表明自我代理归因不足(与某些阳性症状一致),而另一些研究则表明自我代理归因过度。在这篇综述中,我们将评估近期的理论框架能否调和这些不同的结果。我们研究了精神分裂症患者代理异常的识别是否取决于所考虑的自我代理的测量方法(取决于具体的任务要求)和可用的代理相关线索。我们的结论是,所有这些方面都与预测和描述精神分裂症患者可能表现出的代理错误类型有关。我们认为,以预测编码理论为基础的一个特定模型可以协调对精神分裂症代理表现的多种现象的解释,为以新的方式测试代理障碍铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信